On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 18:29 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:56:04PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05:
> > > On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from
> > > > libr
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1:15 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:31:21PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > In the interest of keeping the Rust stack in Fedora in a good state, please
> > add "@rust-sig" group to all you Rust packages on src.fedoraproject.org,
> > unles
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:31:21PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> In the interest of keeping the Rust stack in Fedora in a good state, please
> add "@rust-sig" group to all you Rust packages on src.fedoraproject.org,
> unless
> there is a very good reason not to do so (and if that is the case for
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:55 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> A further quote from the same section of the FHS suggests the use of
> /usr/var, which is a location we are not currently using in the Fedora
> Project, but seems like it would fit the requirements for both CoreOS
> and traditional RPM F
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 9:20 AM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
> >
> >== Summary ==
> >Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
> >`/usr`. The move is alread
I have built an update of xen to the 4.16.0 release on rawhide in the
f36-build-side-49362 side tag. This changes most library
versions in the xen-libs package. I believe that the qemu and libvirt
packages will need to be rebuilt due to the version change.
Michael Young
I'm taking PyQt4
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-01-10/fesco.2022-01-10-19.04.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-01-10/fesco.2022-01-10-19.04.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-01-10/fesco.2022-01-10-19.04.log.html
Thank you Matthew.
Brad
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:12 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:42:10AM -0800, Brad Smith wrote:
> > I am a retired senior manager for a U.S federal agency (US Forest
> > Service). I have a background in software development over the past
> > several
I have changed the License field of dosbox-staging from GPLv2+ to
GPLv3+. That has been the correct license from start, but previously,
licenses of this package's many bundled dependencies were not
considered. Most of the licenses are permissive or public domain-like,
but one is GPLv3+, which b
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:42:10AM -0800, Brad Smith wrote:
> I am a retired senior manager for a U.S federal agency (US Forest
> Service). I have a background in software development over the past
> several decades contributing PRs for a number of open source projects
> but am not an active member
On 10. 01. 22 18:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 08. 01. 22 18:09, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On 1/8/22 04:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello packagers,
I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide...
-
Not yet rebuilt packages:
$ repoquery -q --repo=koji --whatrequires
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:07:33AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Just FTR, I don't think that as a sponsor, I can close the ticket and that
> is a bit discouraging.
There's no way to tell pagure.io "everyone in the fedora packager group
thats a manager is a admin here", so I have manually been ad
Greetings
Peter Hunt (aka haircommander) asked if I might be interested in
assisting with the maintenance of the kubernetes packages for Fedora.
I have the time and interest and some of the needed skills. I am
certainly willing to learn.
I am a retired senior manager for a U.S federal agency (US
On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 23:56 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05:
> > On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from
> > > libre2.so.0a to libre2.so.9.
> > >
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpm
> Am 10.01.2022 um 18:57 schrieb Alexander Sosedkin :
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:20 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>> Currently, the RPM databases
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022, at 11:19 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
>>
>>== Summary ==
>>Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
>>`/usr`. The move is already u
On 10/01/2022 18:50, Евгений Пивнев wrote:
I’m wrong? Or what happens?
sudo dnf install fedora-packager-kerberos
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
On 10. 01. 22 18:57, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:20 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
> >
> >== Summary ==
> >Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
> >`/usr`. The move is alread
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:30 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> David Cantrell writes:
>
> > Reading comments and talking to people, the long standing understanding of
> > /var is still "that's stuff you can rm -rf and the system will still work
> > fine". Technically you could remove the RPM datab
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ibus_table_cangjie_default_for_zh_hk
== Summary ==
Make ibus-table cangjie the default input method for zh_HK (Hongkong) locale.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Mfabian| Mike Fabian]]
* Email:
== Detailed Description ==
Currently, ibus-cangjie is the default i
Trying to push new package:
```
bash-5.1$ kinit tieug...@fedoraproject.org
kinit: Cannot find KDC for realm "FEDORAPROJECT.ORG" while getting initial
credentials
```
I’m wrong? Or what happens?
F35, updated an hour ago.
___
devel mailing list -- devel
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MalayalamDefaultFontsUpdate
== Summary ==
This change will update existing default Malayalam fonts and also
rename to new upstream source, which brings improved text shaping,
better glyphs for readability, Unicode 13 support, Appstream data
amongst other impr
On Mon, Jan 10 2022 at 11:19:40 AM -0500, David Cantrell
wrote:
I would like to see Fedora introduce a new top-level directory called:
/state
Huh, a new top-level directory is a pretty big hammer. Seems like it
would be a lot easier to just have two different locations for the
rpmdb if
Otto Urpelainen writes:
> Igor Raits kirjoitti 9.1.2022 klo 13.24:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm interested to hear if there are any users of the `starship'
>> application here in Fedora that consume it from the repositories.
>> Please speak up if you do!
>
> I use it, too.
Same here and very thankful fo
David Cantrell writes:
> Reading comments and talking to people, the long standing understanding of
> /var is still "that's stuff you can rm -rf and the system will still work
> fine". Technically you could remove the RPM database and the system still
> function [...]
Considering that many othe
Dne 10. 01. 22 v 18:07 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 10. 01. 22 15:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 01. 22 10:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 01. 22 v 18:09 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/libffi-3.4/package/ruby/
Segmentation fault
FAIL 1/1489 tes
On 08. 01. 22 18:09, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On 1/8/22 04:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello packagers,
I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide side tag
f36-build-side-49314 today.
Thank you for helping with the rebuilds!
The previous version remains available as
> Am 10.01.2022 um 17:19 schrieb David Cantrell :
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
>> `/usr`. The move is already
On 10. 01. 22 15:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 01. 22 10:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 01. 22 v 18:09 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/libffi-3.4/package/ruby/
Segmentation fault
FAIL 1/1489 tests failed
This failed in the same place in two diff
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:10:47AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 04. 01. 22 v 21:33 David Cantrell napsal(a):
I feel like I'm missing something, but rpminspect has been doing what
license-validate does for years now. It's ready for SPDX expressions.
Results show up for Fedora builds in Zuul
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 02:59:33AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 04. 01. 22 v 21:03 David Cantrell napsal(a):
One of the difficult things with the Fedora abbreviations is that
tokens can have spaces in them. For example, the Apache 2.0 license
in Fedora is called "ASL 2.0". This makes it re
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:41:35AM -0600, David Duncan wrote:
Peter Robinson writes:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
>
> == Summary ==
> Do not not include NetworkMana
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
== Summary ==
Currently, the RPM databases is located in `/var`. Let's move it to
`/usr`. The move is already under way in rpm-ostree-based
installations, and in (open)SUSE.
[snip]
Hey!
Will attend today too :)
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 1:22 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2022-01-10
> # Time: 16:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
>
> Greetings testers!
>
On 10. 01. 22 10:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 01. 22 v 18:09 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/libffi-3.4/package/ruby/
Segmentation fault
FAIL 1/1489 tests failed
This failed in the same place in two different builds in the test_ractor.rb
(Ruby
Il 10/01/22 14:48, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden ha scritto:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 12:03:25PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:25:31AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> is it a known problem that koji notifications arrive way too late? For
>> yes.
>>
>>> examp
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 12:03:25PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 10:25:31AM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hello,
is it a known problem that koji notifications arrive way too late? For
yes.
example, I got mame build notifications in the wee hours today (31.12)
wheras the
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-01-10 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be dis
I forgot to send out the summary last week, apologies.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-01-03/fesco.2022-01-03-19.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-01-03/fesco.2022-01-03-19.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/f
On 10. 01. 22 13:20, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 13:00 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On 1/9/22 03:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:56:04PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05:
On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The re2
On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 13:00 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 1/9/22 03:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:56:04PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05:
> > > > On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > > The re2 package was update
On 1/9/22 03:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:56:04PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05:
On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from
libre2.so.0a to libre2.so.9.
https://src.fed
On Monday, January 10, 2022 11:22:03 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> **So the plan is to move to RHEL + EPEL next Monday, 2022-01-17.** If
> everything works well at least.
Forgot to mention. This is already deployed to the devel instance. If you want
to give it a try, feel free:
https://cop
Hello maintainers.
Currently, we build all EPEL variants against CentOS "base" in Fedora
Copr, i.e. epel-* configs means CentOS+EPEL. By the end of January 2022
CentOS 8 mirrors will start disappearing, pushing us to change the configs
to avoid build failures.
We would like to start the migrati
Dne 08. 01. 22 v 0:23 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:43:15PM +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
I can give a couple of reasons why just using the packager-sponsors tracker
always would be better. This is from the point of view of somebody who had
to find a sponsor. I am not a spon
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220109.0):
ID: 1099166 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 9/01/2022 23:43, None Business wrote:
I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting
windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool
enough to use this clusterfu..k, it is simply unusable for me , so I am looking
for something that look
Dne 08. 01. 22 v 18:09 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a):
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/libffi-3.4/package/ruby/
Segmentation fault
FAIL 1/1489 tests failed
This failed in the same place in two different builds in the test_ractor.rb
(Ruby Ractor)
test case, and it crashes in 'ra
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220109.0):
ID: 1099037 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi, I'm using it too. I guess expected from the creator of the other thread you
are mentioning :D.
And I would definitely love to have it updated because new version support
right_format on fish, which would be great to have. Because of that I'm using
COPR now.
Jirka
On led 9 2022, at 5:31 pm,
I feel terrible, since I asked him if he could build the HEAD of re2 on
rawhide to have the cmake config files.
I'm really sorry! Let me know if I can help in any way.
El dom, 9 ene 2022 a las 3:30, Kevin Fenzi () escribió:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:56:04PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Mi
For the record, I also created an issue for NetworkManager project.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/issues/895
I think this would be a huge help for many of us migrating to the new syntax -
there are endless combinations of configurations and we need to support man
Hello,
I represent one of system integrators (Foreman configuration and provisioning
management open source project). Thanks for the info.
I would like to ask for taking into consideration shipping some kind of syntax
validation tool that could be executed to validate syntax of the new-style
c
56 matches
Mail list logo
