ent was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090517/b6505ab8/attachment.pgp>
Colin Davis skrev:
> We could probe on the main fproxy page, in the same place we have the IE
> warning, IIRC.
> If they switch it off after that, it's their business; They turned it
> on, and they can turn it off.
I agree.
We could include a first-time dismissable infobox informing the user
t
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with command
> line options to use one profile, it may use another if a window is already
> open, there are things like that... Is opening a window with privacy mode
> enabled safe and reliable?
I haven't
Matthew Toseland skrev:
>> Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at
>> least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be
>> registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking already
>> for the individual browsers. We can also check the v
Colin Davis skrev:
> As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in
> FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is per-window.
>> Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with
>> command
>> line options to use one profile, it may use another if a window is
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> Well, we already have a Browse Freenet script on all three platforms.
> Currently it detects browsers that we know about. You don't have to use it if
> you don't want to. But we should extend it to use incognito mode if possible,
> and to favour browsers with such supp
ghoul at hushmail.com skrev:
> Using the current wininstaller (FreenetInstaller-1210), I installed
> into Windows 7 x64 Build 7100. Installed java as prompted (x32).
> Install went very well. The uninstaller leaves user 'Freenet' and I
> updated my open ticket(bug) with these results.
Your bug at
draketo.de
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090517/976af2ef/attachment.pgp>
Colin Davis skrev:
> We could probe on the main fproxy page, in the same place we have the IE
> warning, IIRC.
> If they switch it off after that, it's their business; They turned it
> on, and they can turn it off.
I agree.
We could include a first-time dismissable infobox informing the user
t
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with command
> line options to use one profile, it may use another if a window is already
> open, there are things like that... Is opening a window with privacy mode
> enabled safe and reliable?
I haven't
Matthew Toseland skrev:
>> Detecting the version of an installed application in the launcher (at
>> least in Windows) shouldn't be a problem. It will most likely be
>> registered in the registry next to the .exe path we are checking already
>> for the individual browsers. We can also check the v
Colin Davis skrev:
> As implemented currently, Private browsing is all-or-nothing in
> FF3.5beta4 and Safari, but Google Chrome is per-window.
>> Firefox has issues with coalescing windows, no? If I run firefox with
>> command
>> line options to use one profile, it may use another if a window is
Matthew Toseland skrev:
> Well, we already have a Browse Freenet script on all three platforms.
> Currently it detects browsers that we know about. You don't have to use it if
> you don't want to. But we should extend it to use incognito mode if possible,
> and to favour browsers with such supp
gh...@hushmail.com skrev:
> Using the current wininstaller (FreenetInstaller-1210), I installed
> into Windows 7 x64 Build 7100. Installed java as prompted (x32).
> Install went very well. The uninstaller leaves user 'Freenet' and I
> updated my open ticket(bug) with these results.
Your bug at htt
On Saturday, 16. May 2009 16:02:19 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Additionally, Gentoo is about choice, if there is a warning, the user can
> choose, with a forcing script, there is no choice, which is a bad idea for
> this philosophy, therefor i vote against such a script for linux.
But in Gentoo it woul
Hi,
It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for
communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the possibility
that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the
internet).
I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of por
16 matches
Mail list logo
