I've got a huge smile on my face right now!
You've done a great job on this total source weighs in at about 8kb +
jQuery, which is great as iUtil.js is resuable for other functions as well.
Excellent work Stefan! Really great!
Now Dojo has one less cool thing that jQuery hasn't! ;)
Stefan Pet
Hi,
> I'm attempting to get the href element for the first link it finds and then
> set that as the url for the entire row's on-click event.
Do you mean something like this?
$.fn.tableHover = function(hoverClass) {
$("tr",this).click(function() {
window.location.href = $(
Great work Stefan!
On 9/29/06, Stefan Petre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for starting a separate thread but the archive is broken. I wanted
> to introduce my try of a fisheye menu. Maybe will get a nice plugin out
> of this
>
> http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/fisheye.html
>
> _
Christof Donat wrote:
>
>
> $.fn.tableHover = function(hoverClass) {
> $("tr",this).click(function() {
> window.location.href = $(this).find('a')[0].href;
> }).hover(function() {
> $(this).addClass(hoverClass);
> }, function() {
> $(t
On Sep 29, 2006, at 17:50, Mika Tuupola wrote:
>> I have a suggestion for improvement. How about sizing the text inputs
>> so they are the same size as the content you are editing? i.e.
>> basically it would just add a border around the text (to indicate you
>> are editing it)
>
> Good idea. They
On Sep 29, 2006, at 18:06, George Adamson wrote:
> You just need to tweak the JQuery syntax a little to refer to
> 'this' instead
> of e.target:
That made syntax more clear but did not help with the problem:
http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/jquery/slideupdown/slideupdown.html
With this exa
This seemed like an interesting problem so I've attempted to solve it. Be kind.BlairOn 9/30/06,
Matt Stith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the closest i've found:http://bradfitz.com/hacks/gestures/
On 9/29/06, Brian Litzinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone done any work with mouse gestu
> Anyway, why a clone() affects the object. Cloning should only create a
> copy object, not affect the state of the original one.
>
I think it is because you may want to chain methods on the cloned object.
If clone() does not substitute the cloned object with the original one,
you could not ca
I looked closely at the og2list module when I made QForge. I think that it would be perfect in this situation given the need for organization around plugins or any other topic.Here's how the site could break down. This is what I did with QForge.
I configured the Drupal Organic Groups module to or
Hello,
reading some tutorials and trying to use them I have a problem with
one of them :
I've a list of dl, dt, dd like this :
Foo
My foo text
Some more foo text
I use this function in my header :
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#foo').find('dd').hide().end().find('dt').click(fun
Use this code instead:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#foo').find('dd').hide().end().find('dt').click(function() {
$(this).find('dd').each(function() {
if ($(this).is(':visible')) {
$(this).slideUp();
Even if your not using the interface plugin you need down load the iUtil
plugin and start using it. I even think that iUtil should go core.
Thanks Stefan Petre
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/iUtil-use-it-tf2362236.html#a6580883
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive
Ok, I won't argue anymore about the clone(), though I think it's not the behaviour that anyone expects (think on the cloneNode() function) and the documentation then is incorrect or very very confusing: "Create cloned copies of all matched DOM Elements. This does not create a cloned copy of this pa
A link would be terribly useful when promoting something this hard. :)
Corey
On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:39 AM, kenton.simpson wrote:
>
> Even if your not using the interface plugin you need down load the
> iUtil
> plugin and start using it. I even think that iUtil should go core.
>
> Thanks Stefan
I don't want to hot link the file, but you can find it here
http://interface.eyecon.ro/download
Corey Jewett-3 wrote:
>
> A link would be terribly useful when promoting something this hard. :)
>
> Corey
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:39 AM, kenton.simpson wrote:
>
>>
>> Even if your not using t
> > > Even if your not using the interface plugin you need down load
> > > the iUtil plugin and start using it. I even think that iUtil should
> > > go core.
> > A link would be terribly useful when promoting something
> > this hard. :)
> I don't want to hot link the file, but you can find it h
It is any of the downloads. Just download the uncompressed version at
the bottom of the page and iUtil is in there.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 9/30/06, Michael Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Even if your not using the interface plugin you need down load
> > > > the iUtil plugin and start using
On Sep 30, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Michael Geary wrote:
Even if your not using the interface plugin you need down load
the iUtil plugin and start using it. I even think that iUtil should
go core.
>
>>> A link would be terribly useful when promoting something
>>> this hard. :)
>
>> I don't
I was upgrading one of my older projects today (from jQuery rev 29 !), and noticed that event.contextMenu went away. It looks like it was dropped at 1.0 -- is there a reason it was dropped?Thanks,Andre
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jqu
Raziel Alvarez ha scritto:
> Ok, I won't argue anymore about the clone(), though I think it's not the
> behaviour that anyone expects (think on the cloneNode() function) and
> the documentation then is incorrect or very very confusing: /"Create
> cloned copies of all matched DOM Elements. This d
Iutil defines these function getPos, getPosition, getSize, getClient,
getScroll, getMargins, getPadding, getBorder, getPointer. There names go a
long way to describe there function. Most if not all the function return
objects with dimensional info about the passed element node. I recently used
it
Oh I finally got it! I'm such an amateur in jQuery. I know what you're saying, it's just that it never crossed my mind that the clone function affects the original object instead of returning a new one. Thanks for your time and sorry for the confusion.
thanks
On 9/30/06, Renato Formato <[EMAIL
http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
> http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
Woah that's out of hand! Great job Stefan!
--John
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 9/30/06, Stefan Petre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
whoa. that rocks.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Stefan Petre wrote:
>
> http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
>
superb!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/3D-Carousel-tf2362646.html#a6582364
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Op 30-sep-2006, om 21:19 heeft Stefan Petre het volgende geschreven:
> http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
Unfortunatly it doesn't work in Safari (2).. :-(
Steef
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discu
> This seemed like an interesting problem so I've attempted to solve it. Be
> kind.
That's really really cool :-) After the post went up I thought about
the problem too - and it seems like you could have just about any
gesture possible by having:
Down (D)
- Down Left to Right (DE)
- Down Right
Hi,
I've written a significant upgrade to my jQuery plugin that creates
similar functionality to the Digg spy (http://digg.com/spy).
Examples and documentation:
http://leftlogic.com/info/articles/jquery_spy2
Source:
http://leftlogic.com/jquery_spy/spy.js
I've addressed some of the feedback
Hi, I tried following :
$.ajax({
type: 'GET',
url: 'php/query/product.php?id=1',
success: function(response){
alert(response.id);
}
});
the php script throws {id:1} (JSON notation data)
The alert under IE is 'undefined';
If I alert (response) - 'object' is displayed.
I
Hello all.
I've just find an strange behaviour while selecting by `id` using `find`.
Take this HTML fragment:
I'm the heroe
This code will result in a one element collection:
$("#nowrap").find("#hero");
This seems to be result of performance optimization when we
Kenton -
A lot of what you're talking about is already, or is going to be,
added in to the Dimensions module in jQuery:
http://jquery.com/dev/svn/jquery/src/dimensions/dimensions.js
Paul has been working on it - and working with Stefan, to try and move
nearly all of the important iUtil parts over
Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven schrieb:
> Use this code instead:
>
> $(document).ready(function() {
> $('#foo').find('dd').hide().end().find('dt').click(function() {
> $(this).find('dd').each(function() {
> if ($(this).is(':visible')) {
>
Nice!On 10/1/06, Stefan Nagtegaal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Op 30-sep-2006, om 21:19 heeft Stefan Petre het volgende geschreven:> http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.htmlUnfortunatly it doesn't work in Safari (2).. :-(
Steef___jQuery ma
Wow.. im definatly going to be using this one! Thanks!On 9/30/06, Stefan Petre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/
__
response is the XMLRequest whatsit. This is so you can access response headers if you need to. So if the result is JSON:$.ajax({ type: 'GET', url: 'php/query/product.php?id=1', success: function(response){
var result = eval("("+response.responseText+")"); alert(result
.id); }
Hi folks,
the thread about showing and hiding DDs when clicking DTs gave me an
idea for a chainable if/else construct. I have implemented and tested it
and now I'd like to know if this is useful enough to be released as a
plugin or even adding to the core.
Basically I extended the current is(S
>From what I understand of the _expression_ handling code, this would require hard coding and not just a new selector. P could try using this instead (with some tweaking :) ):$(document).ready(function() {
$('#foo dt').click(function() {
var show=false; var
That would definitely make my solution simpler. If it doesn't add too much to the core size, then I'd say yes.On 10/1/06, Jörn Zaefferer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi folks,the thread about showing and hiding DDs when clicking DTs gave me an
idea for a chainable if/else construct. I have implemente
How does this differ from filter(':visible').each(function(){...})?
Corey
On Sep 30, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> the thread about showing and hiding DDs when clicking DTs gave me an
> idea for a chainable if/else construct. I have implemented and
> tested it
> and
Well done, Jörn!
It makes me remember the work of John Klinger:
http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-July/#7292
Franck.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
> Well done, Jörn!
>
> It makes me remember the work of John Klinger:
> http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-July/#7292
It reminded me of that too. I kind of like the simplicity of this
solution. Doing a chainable .else() like what John K did is
fundamentally "really hard".
--John
> I was upgrading one of my older projects today (from jQuery rev 29 !), and
> noticed that event.contextMenu went away. It looks like it was dropped at
> 1.0 -- is there a reason it was dropped?
I hadn't heard of anyone actually using it. Since removing it, you're
the second person who's noticed,
This is really good, and written better than what I could have done. In my
case I'm needing it to affect numerous elements on the page such as
li.sortableitem's. It doesn't seem to be allowing me to get the id of which
element is clicked on.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
Although, going back through his code - I really like what he did. He
made it such that you no longer had to use anonymous function wrappers
- which I really like. It'd be really cool to be able to do:
$("#foo")
.find("div")
.click()
.filter(".someclass")
.a
Good point. I've updated the plugin so that the gesture callback has access to the originating element as 'this'.BTW I can't for the life of me remember how to suppress text selection, if anyone can give me a hand I'd appreciate it.
BlairOn 10/1/06, Brian Litzinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This i
Hi folks,
I apologize in advance for the length of this post, but I have a
potential community project which could show off jQuery's chops, and
help some people out at the same time.
Here's the background: Through my blog I've ended up in contact with
someone who is working on helping to teach th
Stefan ,
Should use my 3d rotator for this ^_^
will
> http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
>
> ___
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
>
>
___
I just saw this discussion here.
http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6330927813/m/378000821831
Looks like the translated version of this should work:
document. () { return false; } // IE
document. () { return false; } // Others
-Kurt
From:
[EMAIL PROTECT
Has there been much testing with IE7 RC1? Some of the code I'm writing that uses a lot of slides, fades and cloning works fine simultaneously in FF1.5.0.7, Opera 9.0.2 and Safari 2.0.4 but breaks in IE7 RC1. I'm getting a "This command is not supported." in line 133. I'm not going to dump my sourc
Have you tried it in IE 6? If I remember correctly, IE has issues
changing input types from one type to another - someone can correct me
on that if I'm mistaken.
--John
On 9/30/06, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has there been much testing with IE7 RC1? Some of the code I'm writing that
> use
Hi folks!
I am a graphic designer who has taught myself web development over
the last few years. I have been using jQuery for the behaviour layer
of a site since maybe March this year and absolutely love it. From a
Mac-oriented, drag and drop,user-friendly perspective, jQuery makes
javascr
Glen Lipka schrieb:
> I am working on a page with some tabs.
> http://glenlipka.kokopop.com/jQuery/payroll/AssistedPayroll.htm
>
> I didn't use the tabs plugin because it seemed to have so much specific
> css attached to it and I wanted to keep it simple.
>
> The main bug I have is that when y
Will Jessup wrote:
> Stefan ,
>
> Should use my 3d rotator for this ^_^
>
> will
>
>> http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
>>
>> ___
>> jQuery mailing list
>> discuss@jquery.com
>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
I saw ant, and since I hadn't anted on this machine,,, I figured try
the old fashioned Makefile... it's missing a line @66 to create the
test/js directory out of the box it does all the make features
except test pretty good start!
@66
@@mkdir -p ${TEST_DIR}/js
Skip the ant if you
Thanks for the response Jake. You still give me far too much credit
though. I have no idea how to go about using "Makefile". What is it?
I assume its not an OS X application with a simple GUI. Do I use the
Terminal? If so, what do I type? A google search reveals more
baffling command-line d
Thanks Kurt, that did the trick. :)On 10/1/06, Kurt Mackey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just saw this discussion here.
http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6330927813/m/378000821831
Looks like the translated version of this should work:
document. () { return f
Sorry! I got make on my machine from installing xcode(from appple) or
cpan(cpan.perl.org) or somewhere along the way!
I've use it a all the time,,, cpan (the magic perl installer)
sometimes fails, so I have to resort to make.
make syntax is "way out there"... ant is cool and xml!
good luck antin
58 matches
Mail list logo
