---------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:00:34 -0500 (EST)
> From: Paul Wouters
> To: Dan York
> Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org"
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS privacy and Team Cymru's report on 300, 000
>
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Dan York wrote:
>
> > I don't even see DNSSEC helping much here, either, given that the
> > attacker could just strip out the DNSSEC info (unless, perhaps, the
> > home computers were running full (vs stub) recursive resolvers that
> > also did DNSSEC-vali
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Dan York wrote:
Now, in this case the attackers compromised the local network devices and took
over control of the local recursive resolvers. In this
case of the attacker controlling the recursive resolver, I don't know that any
of the various solutions thrown around today
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:09:33PM +, Dan York wrote:
> this case of the attacker controlling the recursive resolver, I
> don't know that any of the various solutions thrown around today
> would do anything to help with this.
But this was exactly the question I (among others) was trying to
t for the first case you can do
nothing except waiting for immediate action of rescue team.
Hosnieh
From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dan York
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 12:10 AM
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: [DNSOP] DNS privacy and Team Cymru's report o
DNSOP members,
Given our session today talking about protecting DNS privacy, I found an
interesting bit of synchronicity upon going back to my room and seeing this
article in my feeds about a compromise of at least 300,000 small office / home
office (SOHO) home routers by a variety of attacks
