Eugen Minciu wrote:
> Hi, here's another patch for entrance.
>
> OK, I've done this acccording to what raster told me, I hope I
> understood these things properly.
>
> 1) A shell should be run, so the users's profile is loaded. After
> thinking about it, this is a great idea indeed, this way if I
Hi, here's another patch for entrance.OK, I've done this acccording to what raster told me, I hopeĀ I understood these things properly.1) A shell should be run, so the users's profile is loaded. After thinking about it, this is a great idea indeed, this way if I have a ~/bin in my PATH my wm can ru
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:12:47 +0200 Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:55:19 +0200 Sebastian Dransfeld
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> >> Eugen Minciu wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:29:08 +0100
> >>> Ess
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:55:19 +0200 Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
>> Eugen Minciu wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:29:08 +0100
>>> Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well .. then maybe we shouldn't clearenv() in the
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:50:31 +0100 Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Justin Patrin wrote:
> > On 8/28/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:55:19 +0200 Sebastian Dransfeld
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >>
> >>
> >
It _should_ inherit DISPLAY (as it's passed through a parameter to the function. This thing does work on my machine, remember?Also Essien told me he is currently working on fixing up session detection through ecore_desktop, so this may just be a case of our code not playing nice together ;)
Could s
Justin Patrin wrote:
> On 8/28/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:55:19 +0200 Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> babbled:
>>
>>
>>> Eugen Minciu wrote:
>>>
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:29:08 +0100
Essien Ita Essien <[
On 8/28/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:55:19 +0200 Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > Eugen Minciu wrote:
> > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:29:08 +0100
> > > Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Well .. the
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:55:19 +0200 Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Eugen Minciu wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:29:08 +0100
> > Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well .. then maybe we shouldn't clearenv() in the first place? We may not
> > need to, since se
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:57:13 +0300 Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:29:08 +0100
> Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well .. then maybe we shouldn't clearenv() in the first place? We may not
> need to, since setenv(x,y,1) is called, which overwrites
Eugen Minciu wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:29:08 +0100
> Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well .. then maybe we shouldn't clearenv() in the first place? We may not
> need to, since setenv(x,y,1) is called, which overwrites the var's contents
> anyway. I didn't want to try it be
Eugen Minciu wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:01:54 +0300
> Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And here is another version that frees the memory it allocates in the correct
> place.
>
> Sorry about so many posts on what should have been a simple thingie. It's the
> first patch I'm sending
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:29:08 +0100
Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well .. then maybe we shouldn't clearenv() in the first place? We may not need
to, since setenv(x,y,1) is called, which overwrites the var's contents anyway.
I didn't want to try it before because I suspected clearen
Eugen Minciu wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:01:54 +0300
> Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And here is another version that frees the memory it allocates in the correct
> place.
>
> Sorry about so many posts on what should have been a simple thingie. It's the
> first patch I'm sending
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:01:54 +0300
Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And here is another version that frees the memory it allocates in the correct
place.
Sorry about so many posts on what should have been a simple thingie. It's the
first patch I'm sending you guys, I promise I'll try to s
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:04:10 +0100
Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ouch, sorry, lol :)
Here it is
> Eugen Minciu wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:22:38 +0300
> > Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And finally, I've got it.
> >
> > The problem was in entrance_auth_setup_envi
Eugen Minciu wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:22:38 +0300
> Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And finally, I've got it.
>
> The problem was in entrance_auth_setup_environment() which called clearenv().
>
> For some reasong calling getenv() there did not return the path either. So I
> added
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:22:38 +0300
Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And finally, I've got it.
The problem was in entrance_auth_setup_environment() which called clearenv().
For some reasong calling getenv() there did not return the path either. So I
added an extra parameter, const char *pa
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:49:40 +0100
Essien Ita Essien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed. But it seems that just passing the environ pointer to an execve() call
is not sufficient. What bash -l does is invoke /etc/profile ~/.bash_profile etc.
So I need a way to parse those files (at least from a co
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:36:31 +0300
Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've figured out what causes the problem, but I don't know how to fix it this
time.
This happens because once I replace the execl() call in
entrance_session_start_user_session, the environment variables for the user are
Eugen Minciu wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:30:58 +0300
> Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, it seems that if I use this I get some issues within e. If I try to
> start an application from the run command thingie, it will tell me that the
> application failed to start.
>
> I'll t
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:30:58 +0300
Eugen Minciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, it seems that if I use this I get some issues within e. If I try to
start an application from the run command thingie, it will tell me that the
application failed to start.
I'll try to see what causes this. If any
Here's a new patch for entranced and entrance.
This time I did what the comment suggested in both places. I used strtok and
parsed directly into a char ** which then gets run by execv/execvp.
If my code strikes you as ugly (I'm not sure if it should) be sure to tell me
what I did wrong and I'll
23 matches
Mail list logo