AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: A different take on the ontological status of Math
Dear Friends,
I highly recommend Louis H. Kauffman's new blog. His latest post
speaks to the Becoming interpretation of mathematics that I advocate:
http://kauffman2013.wordpress.com/2014/01
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Paul King
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 6:48 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: A different take on the ontological status of Math
Dear Friends,
I highly recommend Louis H. Kauffman's new blog
On 11 Jan 2014, at 16:06, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com
wrote:
Dear Friends,
I highly recommend Louis H. Kauffman's new blog. His latest post
speaks to the Becoming interpretation of mathematics that I
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 11 Jan 2014, at 16:06, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Friends,
I highly recommend Louis H. Kauffman's new blog. His
Dear Friends,
I highly recommend Louis H. Kauffman's new blog. His latest post speaks
to the Becoming interpretation of mathematics that I advocate:
http://kauffman2013.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/is-mathematics-real/
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
--
You received this message
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Friends,
I highly recommend Louis H. Kauffman's new blog. His latest post speaks
to the Becoming interpretation of mathematics that I advocate:
By the way
2014/1/11, Platonist Guitar Cowboy multiplecit...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Friends,
I highly recommend Louis H. Kauffman's new blog. His latest post speaks
to the Becoming interpretation of
The mathematical entity GG wraps right around itself. Just so does our
language and apparent existence wrap around itself and give us the
possibility that we are ‘nothing more’ than our own description of our own
description, a kind of illusion that generates its own illusion.
Lovely! The sort
Note however that Kauffman does not go into axioms involved for set theory,
whichever version he is referencing I can't make out, and steps to the side
of that. The article would loose a bit of its metaphorical slickness if he
had, I'd guess... PGC
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:45 PM, LizR
9 matches
Mail list logo
