SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes)
I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I
have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user
which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign
the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt
It seems to me that all you need to do is add the new AD account to the
original mailbox and then remove the old corrupt account from the
permissions.
Maybe I am missing something, but that should do it.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Rob Hackney
Reply To: Exchange
I want to know who I can call to make sure I'm getting my proper kickbacks.
That's money I'm losing out on Deckler!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 1:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Hi Nate,
I have added the new AD account already and removed the 'SELF' rights
from mailbox permissions however when I try and delete the 'corrupt'ad
account, I cannot deselect the check box against 'mark this mailbox for
deletion'.
Perhaps this is a Small Business server restriction? Doesn't
It's okay to delete the mailbox if you have retention set on the Store. PSS
didn't give you exact directions. Check out
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enfamilyid=9e52bafc-5c33-46b9-af14-04e4d989ef6b
From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
If you are running exchange 2000 sp3, you have an updated ADUC. Click
on view and enable the advanced features. Right click on the corrupt
user and choose Exchange Tasks. Remove the exchange attributes. Go
into the ESM and right click on mailboxes and choose run cleanup
agent. After it
Isn't that permissions/account modification information going to be in the
logs for one of your DC's?
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 6:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Thanks to
Anyone out there using Mailbox Manager?
I am having a little trouble with mine, I have my manager set up on a test
box.
Currently it is set to audit only with these specifics:
Inbox: 3 Days
Sent Items: 3 Days
Deleted Items: 3 Days
Other Folders: 5 Days
The mailboxes on this server were imported
I think Exmerge changes the time stamp of messages. Not sure open and look
see.
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mailbox Manager
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:13:17 -0400
Anyone
I understand, but that's why I set the time to only be 3 days...
It also is not sending any log files to my Administrator mailbox
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:17 AM
To:
I was thinning maybe a permissions issue but you are probable using the
Exchange account to login and run. But since this is a 5.5 Exchange server,
maybe something to do with LegacyDN. Are you running AD yet.
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
We are running AD and I thought of permissions too I was just unsure where
to start looking, because I am using the Service account.
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:31 AM
To:
Thanks. This worked for me on the same issue, but I only had one user
affected.
__
D. DuBose Egleston Jr.
Director of Technology
Porter-Gaud School
Charleston, SC 29407
843.402.4677 wk
843.343.9774 cell
843.219.0336 pgr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.portergaud.edu
You can also simply stop the Exch55 services, move (keep) the log files to
another drive/server, and start the services. When you stop the services,
all data in the transaction logs SHOULD be committed to the databases.
I've seen KBs on MS' website implying it doesn't always happen ut it has
No way. Never do it manually, never.
Way to often people move or delete their log files and hose the whole
system. Next thing you know they are on the phone with PSS.
Use the tools provided by Exchange to do the job. In your case, the
optimizer.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Megginson
What? I don't thnik so.
From: Chris Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Manually relocate transaction log files
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:53:41 -0700
You can also simply stop the Exch55 services, move
And how do you tell Exchange where to look for transaction logs next
time it starts?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:54 AM
To:
You are kidding, right?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Manually relocate transaction log
Is there a way to rename Public Folders from the command line?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To
Setup;
Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no
issues.
Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice.
Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot
access Exchange System Manager, get error
Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No:
Hi Experts,
sorry for my little knowledge as new to Exchange. Got inherited with some
couple of Exchange servers. I want to know if its possible to create a new
mail box and hide it and if possible all the incoming mails can be received
or not..
Looking forward to hear from you.
Senty
maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it
looks like this to me
if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or
it guy, probably everyone would say doctor
ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get
paid
Yep, Advanced TAB can hide it from the GAL (also means you can not access
it from OWA).
-Original Message-
From: Senty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox
Hi Experts,
sorry for my little knowledge as new to
You could take the work IT out of these kinds of statements and put in
anything you want and it would come out exactly the same
-Original Message-
From: Joel Wampler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 6:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler
ADUC for 2003 Server is changed when you install Exchange 2003. I think you
may have missed a step. Was this all done in place and not tested in a lab.?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Permissions
Well, to look at your point about a Pfizer certification, don't mechanics
have different certifications based on what type of automobiles they work
on? I believe there's a Ford certification and something else... I'm not
real knowledgable on the subject.
Matt
-Original Message-
From:
I did find this artical earlier and all systems already have the correct
values. So I'm still getting the same issue.
Thanks. This worked for me on the same issue, but I only had one user
affected.
__
D. DuBose Egleston Jr.
Director of Technology
Porter-Gaud School
Hi all. Are there tools out there that would examine all the mailboxes
and count their unread messages, and if the number of unread messages in
a given mailbox is greater than a certain threshold send a warning to
the admins?
Thanks!
So who all is going to the Exchange Connections conference in Florida?
www.winconnections.com
-Tony
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Thanks, I did try it in a lab first of all, but was with an empty
system. What step was missed?
Exchange 2000 to 2003 - no issues. All admin tools working, no access
denied message.
Windows 2000 to Windows 2003, issue below. All AD steps were taken.
Any Ideas?
-Original Message-
Server - Exchange 5.5 SP4 + hotfixes on Win2k SP2
Workstation - WinXP SP1
I am trying to automagically clean out my admin mailbox from my workstation,
using the Exchange Admin Console. Due to brute force spamming, this mailbox
has over 171k NDR's in it that I don't need or want. They were
The Mailbox Manager began using the Last Modified Date with SP4. You can
add this field to your Outlook view to check it, or you can view the
properties of the message. Every time you modify message (move it, delete
it, etc.), the timer is reset.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Morgan,
It's the assertion that doctors are more professional /because/ they
don't take benefits from the manufacturers - which is false. Further,
if a particular piece of technology is complicated enough to require a
certification, then I'd sure prefer them to not only be certified on it,
but also to
Pardon my penny and a half's worth, but any site with connections to an
organization that has Social Responsibility in it, is nothing more
than a front for some wildly left leaning, anti-capitalist,
anti-business nest of hobgoblins.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta,
I have to be missing something and it's causing me to go bald very early in life.
Here is what I am doing:
Single Exchange 2k Server
domain1.com has always worked
Have added new users that will be using domain2.com. DNS records are changed and
pointing to the same server and are working
So to draw a parallel to the world of doctors, you want:
A state licensing board for an IT guy/gal to call themselves an
IT guy/gal.
A state licensing board for every subspecialty of IT
(programming, systems admin, network design, network operations, mail
(Netscape), mail
Hmmm. Oddly enough, I would have figured it to be the other way round; that
any person who attempts to keep me from being able to do my job freely with
no complications was a capitalist wage-slave owner, but's that's just my
particular set of thoughts...
Matt
-Original Message-
From:
Hello all,
I would like to set up certain groups here at the hospital (most namely
sci.med.* and Microsoft.public.*, but our ISP doesn't appear to have a
news provider that allows push/pull (supernews). If anyone knows of free
newsfeeds with push/pull, let me know!
TIA,
Mitchell D. Lawrence
The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is
that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet
then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion
that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a
medical
Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks
and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need
a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so
amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course).
That would automatically make him unethical then as well. He was one of
the consultants that helped migrate our mail system (not my choice to
bring in consultants). Walked in wearing a Novell jacket and a Novell
shirt.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
gasp And how many NetWare/Groupwise seats did he force you to buy?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman
Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are
Please describe the issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I don't know what your issue is, so I'm afraid I'd have to answer No
at the moment. :) Perhaps you could elaborate?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
However, if he walked in wearing a Lotus Notes shirt/jacket you COULD
question his intelligence. ;)
Joseph Smith
Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL
This one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: 15 September 2003 17:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Found word(s) list error in the Text body. -
Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
Setup;
Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no
issues.
Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice.
Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot
access Exchange System Manager, get error
Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No:
I don't think I explained that right;
Everything was ok when the system was Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003.
The issue came when I Upgraded the Windows 2000 to Windows 2003.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: 15 September
Why don't you re-run the Exchange 2003 installation? It looks like
Windows 2003 setup over-wrote some Exchange-related stuff.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I would a) re-apply the Windows 2003 adminpak.msi and b) reinstall
Exchange - specifically the admin tools.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 15, 2003
Thanks, I have tried that, the re-install of the Windows 2003 admin made
no difference, and the re-run of Exchange 2003 setup, now comes up with
Access Denied
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: 15 September 2003 22:19
And you'd pay all this money just so that state board
could aggressively ignore all violations of standards
as medical boards typically do.
Ed
--- John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to draw a parallel to the world of doctors, you
want:
A state licensing board for an IT guy/gal
You need domain2.com in a recipient policy.
Ed
--- Steck, Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to be missing something and it's causing me
to go bald very early in life. Here is what I am
doing:
Single Exchange 2k Server
domain1.com has always worked
Have added new users that will be
What I'd expect from an Atlanta plantation owner.
Ed
--- John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pardon my penny and a half's worth, but any site
with connections to an
organization that has Social Responsibility in it,
is nothing more
than a front for some wildly left leaning,
True for Exchange 5.5.
Ed
--- Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, Advanced TAB can hide it from the GAL (also
means you can not access
it from OWA).
-Original Message-
From: Senty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 10:25
To: Exchange Discussions
The question is, do you have anything to contribute to the ethics/book
discussion or are you just hijacking this topic?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Sorry, this change in topic requires a new subject. Don't post a new
question like this with an old subject line. The people who you might
interest will ignore it and the people in that other conversation will
be a tad annoyed at your interruption.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hello Guys,
I have a server that I want to move OWA 5.5 to but the dam thing won't
take the Exchange SP4 update :(
Here are the specifications on the box.
Windows Server 2000 SP3
1 gig of ram
Dual Xeon CPU's
Exchange 5.5 OWA installs fine to the box. It's when I go
I would, at this point, then call PSS. PSS= Microsoft Product Support
Services. They are paid to get your system back up and running.
Seems you've exhausted the quick ideas of the free support forum.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kinda sounds like a service is not shutting down properly. Try manually
shutting down all services for Exchange then try.
From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box
I completely agree with you.
I have progressed on the issue. I deleted the administrator local
profile, now the tools work.
However, I am getting a nasty message in the event log that suggests
there is a schema problem...
Maybe Ed can look at it ?
Source EXOLEDB
Event Id 111
Microsoft
Tony,
If you agree with Andy, then why not do something about it and CHANGE
THE SUBJECT?!
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 September 2003 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
I
I tried manually stopping the IIS services but, it didn't help. Outlook Web
Access is the only exchange app installed on this box :(
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5
[My apologies for the cross-post, but this has the potential to impact just
about everybody who uses the Internet...]
As of a little while ago (it is around 7:45 PM US Eastern on Mon 15 Sep
2003 as I write this), VeriSign added a wildcard A record to the .COM and
.NET TLD DNS zones. The IP
Not sure maybe shutdown any antivirus programs running
From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4 update to OWA box wont install :(
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:44:37 -0400
I tried
I need to create an automated bulletin board system using Exchange 2000
and Outlook 2000. It needs to be fairly automated with people being able
to subscribe and unsubscribe. ANY direction would be appreciated.
Thank you
Ron
PS: Users are in a W2K domain. No outside access.
Why not use Public Folders?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003
68 matches
Mail list logo
