On 26 Apr 2008, at 22:49, Jack Howarth wrote:
> JF,
>Don't forget that I had to manually add the -lXm to the link
> flags in the original mesa-libglw patch. I would argue that the
> approach to leave the these symbols undefined and suppress
> the error is more convention. The fedora developer
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
> []
> >> Keeping a pre-pangocairo/stable tree alongside a pangocairo/unstable
> >> tree will not work, either. How could we then move packages from
> >> unstable to stable?
> >
> > Mixing stable and unstable
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
>> Keeping a pre-pangocairo/stable tree alongside a pangocairo/unstable
>> tree will not work, either. How could we then move packages from
>> unstable to stable?
>
> Mixing stable and unstable (i.e., using older "stable" packages once
> one has started using "unstable", o
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:16:25PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Martin Costabel wrote:
> []
> >cd /sw/fink/10.4
> >mv stable /dev/null
> >mv unstable stable
> >mv pangocairo-branch/unstable unstable
> >
> > I know it's a dream,
>
> After looking for a while at the state of pan
JF,
Don't forget that I had to manually add the -lXm to the link
flags in the original mesa-libglw patch. I would argue that the
approach to leave the these symbols undefined and suppress
the error is more convention. The fedora developers don't link
libGLw against a specific motif and their lib
On Apr 26, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 26.04.2008 um 19:55 schrieb Martin Costabel:
>
>> Max Horn wrote:
>>> Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn:
>>>
Hi,
using the 10.4 pangocairo branch:
Can't resolve dependency "libxml2-shlibs (>= 2.6.30-1)" for package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Horn wrote:
| Update: I just got a suspicion, and run "touch" on the .info file.
| Now fink recognized that it was new. Ouch. I thought "fink index"
| would force the index to be rebuilt, but obviously that is not the
| case. I will now manually t
On Apr 26, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
> On 26 Apr 2008, at 14:51, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>>
>>> We need to move packages much more quickly from the unstable to
>>> stable
>>> trees. The concept of waiting for adequate positive fee
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
>cd /sw/fink/10.4
>mv stable /dev/null
>mv unstable stable
>mv pangocairo-branch/unstable unstable
>
> I know it's a dream,
After looking for a while at the state of pangocairo-branch/stable, I am
now convinced that what I proposed is not a dream, it is
Am 26.04.2008 um 19:55 schrieb Martin Costabel:
> Max Horn wrote:
>> Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> using the 10.4 pangocairo branch:
>>>
>>> Can't resolve dependency "libxml2-shlibs (>= 2.6.30-1)" for package
>>> "gconf2-2.20.1-1" (no matching
>>> packages/versions f
Am 26.04.2008 um 20:21 schrieb Martin Costabel:
> Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
>> Yhellow,
>>
>> I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with
>> freetype
>> 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling
>> gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Costabel wrote:
| In both trees, the guile18-gtk package has the same version, 2.0-6.
| The result is that when doing the update-all to the pc-branch, this
| package is not rebuilt and continues to spread the wrong linking
| information.
|
| Sh
On 26 Apr 2008, at 14:51, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
>> We need to move packages much more quickly from the unstable to
>> stable
>> trees. The concept of waiting for adequate positive feedback does
>> not
>> work, IMHO, as people who are happ
On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> We need to move packages much more quickly from the unstable to stable
> trees. The concept of waiting for adequate positive feedback does not
> work, IMHO, as people who are happy with something usually keep
> quiet. If there is a major prob
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
>> Yhellow,
>>
>> I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype
>> 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling
>> gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a
>> missing /sw
On 26 Apr 2008, at 20:29, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> []
>> I see the following diff :
>>
>> ...
> Why should these symbols be picked up if -lXm is not on the linker
> line
> and Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup is present?
Sorry, had forgotten to diff the patch file t
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
[]
> I see the following diff :
>
> 7c7
> < Depends: x11, openmotif3-shlibs, %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
> ---
> > Depends: x11, %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
> 12c12
> < make OPT_FLAGS="-O3 -I%p/include" LIB_DIR=lib darwin
> ---
> > make OPT_FLAGS="-O3 -I%p/include" LIB_DIR=lib dar
Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
> Yhellow,
>
> I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype
> 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling
> gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a
> missing /sw/lib/libpango-1.0.la
This mus
On 26 Apr 2008, at 18:09, Jack Howarth wrote:
>In working up some test packaging for a new openmotif4
> package (to provide openmotif 2.3.0), I discovered that my
> current mesa-libglw package is explicitly linking libXm
> into libGLw.dylib. By comparision, the mesa-libglw package
> in fedora
Yhellow,
I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype
219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling
gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a
missing /sw/lib/libpango-1.0.la
I don't know how to solve that. I switched back
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:39:16PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> William Scott wrote:
> > gtk+2 seems to build and link to /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib when
> > present, but silently not do so in its absence.
> >
> > I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying
> > ri
Max Horn wrote:
> Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> using the 10.4 pangocairo branch:
>>
>> Can't resolve dependency "libxml2-shlibs (>= 2.6.30-1)" for package
>> "gconf2-2.20.1-1" (no matching
>> packages/versions found)
>
> Oh yeah, forgot this:
>
> Caladan-II:~/Desktop/W
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:28:52AM +1000, James Bunton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The mplayer package that I'm working on (tracker #1885675) depends on
> libx264-57-shlibs which depends on gdk-pixbuf, which depends on
> gnome-libs-dev.
>
> I'm not sure why libx264 has this dependency on gdk-pixbuf. It comp
Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn:
> Hi,
>
> using the 10.4 pangocairo branch:
>
> Can't resolve dependency "libxml2-shlibs (>= 2.6.30-1)" for package
> "gconf2-2.20.1-1" (no matching
> packages/versions found)
Oh yeah, forgot this:
Caladan-II:~/Desktop/WordPress$ fink list libxml2
Scanni
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:09:45PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>In working up some test packaging for a new openmotif4
> package (to provide openmotif 2.3.0), I discovered that my
> current mesa-libglw package is explicitly linking libXm
> into libGLw.dylib. By comparision, the mesa-libglw packa
Hi,
using the 10.4 pangocairo branch:
Can't resolve dependency "libxml2-shlibs (>= 2.6.30-1)" for package
"gconf2-2.20.1-1" (no matching
packages/versions found)
Cheers,
Max
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 J
Am 25.04.2008 um 17:25 schrieb Benjamin Reed:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Max Horn wrote:
>
> |fink scanpackages
> |sudo apt-get update
> |sudo apt-get install pango1-xft2-ft219-dev=1.18.4-2 pango1-xft2-
> | ft219=1.18.4-2
> | pango1-xft2-ft219-shlibs=1.18.4-
On 26-Apr-08, at 12:11 , Martin Costabel wrote:
> What I am dreaming of is that somone would have the courage to step up
> to the cvs server and do the equivalent of
>
> cd /sw/fink/10.4
> mv stable /dev/null
> mv unstable stable
> mv pangocairo-branch/unstable unstable
++
We need to mov
Daniel Macks wrote:
> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> "pangocairo" soon.
Please don't wait too long. Seriously maintaining 4 versions
10.4/{stable,unstable} and 10.4-pangocairo/{stable,unstable} in addition
to the 10.4/10.5 and ppc/intel alternatives is imp
In working up some test packaging for a new openmotif4
package (to provide openmotif 2.3.0), I discovered that my
current mesa-libglw package is explicitly linking libXm
into libGLw.dylib. By comparision, the mesa-libglw package
in fedora 8 linux doesn't do this (allowing the same
libglw to be u
William Scott wrote:
> gtk+2 seems to build and link to /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib when
> present, but silently not do so in its absence.
>
> I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying
> right in coot depending on build-order, and I am at least somewhat
> certain
gtk+2 seems to build and link to /sw/lib/librsvg-2.2.dylib when
present, but silently not do so in its absence.
I've had a number of people complain to me about icons not displaying
right in coot depending on build-order, and I am at least somewhat
certain this is where the problem lies.
Hi,
The mplayer package that I'm working on (tracker #1885675) depends on
libx264-57-shlibs which depends on gdk-pixbuf, which depends on
gnome-libs-dev.
I'm not sure why libx264 has this dependency on gdk-pixbuf. It compiles and
works for me well without it and this saves my poor old Powerbook f
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:03:15PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> OK, I'd like to add these updates to Fink on Saturday. People should
> object before then.
I've updated the tracker with a version that uses the new libdvdread.3 package.
---
James
pgpCbnLoaSn4K.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
34 matches
Mail list logo
