On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 09:47 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Yes, for system-xfree86 I guess we need to test to make sure that the
user has upgraded his or her externally installed version of things.
At some point there will also be issues related to fixing problems
created by Apple's insta
Yes, for system-xfree86 I guess we need to test to make sure that the
user has upgraded his or her externally installed version of things.
At some point there will also be issues related to fixing problems
created by Apple's install-name bug, I guess.
-- Dave
--
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 08:44 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
OK Dave, I'll try this. It certainly is a lot easier than the myriad
of
things I've been trying lately. What about people with system-xfree86?
We
don't want to overwrite those files do we?
We'll make a system-xfree86 4.3 then, I s
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> What I've just done with the major teTeX upgrade is to put a lot of
> "Replaces" and "Provides" lines but almost no "Conflicts" lines.
>
> What this does is enables the user to upgrade without dpkg complaining.
> Any file which exists in one
Jeff,
What I've just done with the major teTeX upgrade is to put a lot of
"Replaces" and "Provides" lines but almost no "Conflicts" lines.
What this does is enables the user to upgrade without dpkg complaining.
Any file which exists in one of the old packages and also exists in
the new package is
BTW, did you notice that Apple has released the sources of their X11,
and commited to the XFree CVS ?
This could end to some interesting stuff, right ? :-)
Pejvan
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Max Horn wrote:
At 5:52 Uhr -0700 01.02.2003, jeff whitaker wrote:
Ben: Thanks for the
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Max Horn wrote:
> At 5:52 Uhr -0700 01.02.2003, jeff whitaker wrote:
> >Ben: Thanks for the update. I'm somewhat at a loss of how to proceed
> >with a 4.3.0 package. Since it contains thread support, it should replace
> >both xfree86-base and xfree86-base-threaded. At the s
At 5:52 Uhr -0700 01.02.2003, jeff whitaker wrote:
Ben: Thanks for the update. I'm somewhat at a loss of how to proceed
with a 4.3.0 package. Since it contains thread support, it should replace
both xfree86-base and xfree86-base-threaded. At the same time, I'd like
to merge the -base and -root
Ben: Thanks for the update. I'm somewhat at a loss of how to proceed
with a 4.3.0 package. Since it contains thread support, it should replace
both xfree86-base and xfree86-base-threaded. At the same time, I'd like
to merge the -base and -rootless variants. So, the new package should
replace x
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 08:28 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
As of the last snapshots, things have worked pretty good as far as
backwards-compatibility with software built against xfree86 4.2, but
keep in mind that if you plan on testing this, and you build something
against it, it won't wor
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 06:46 PM, Torrey Lyons wrote:
The code freeze for XFree86 4.3.0 will be any day now. I believe the
Mac OS X/Darwin part of the code base is pretty much in final form.
Benjamin put together a package in fink unstable which builds
something very close to the top o
Isn't Ben's package still in experimental rather than unstable? That
limits the potential testers.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA 02139-42
The code freeze for XFree86 4.3.0 will be any day now. I believe the
Mac OS X/Darwin part of the code base is pretty much in final form.
Benjamin put together a package in fink unstable which builds
something very close to the top of the tree. I would encourage as
many people as possible to giv
13 matches
Mail list logo
