On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 02:41:59AM -0400, Thimble Smith wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:52:32PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> > Anyone like the idea of adding wide char support to our libc? Maybe
> > we could port it over from {Net,Open}BSD or BSDi. This would add the
> > header file , etc.
>
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:52:32PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> Anyone like the idea of adding wide char support to our libc? Maybe
> we could port it over from {Net,Open}BSD or BSDi. This would add the
> header file , etc.
There's a mailing list, freebsd-i18n, that seems to be very active
regar
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
>
> > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and
> > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it
> > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-)
> >
> > I'd go along with that. Wh
> >Unlike X (which rarely changes), I suspect the Motif stuff to change
> >alot.
>
> I'm unclear on what gyrations you are expecting from a mature API
> codified in an IEEE standard. As long as you're using the Motif
> standard interface in your code you should have nothing to worry about.
Ahh,
Anyone like the idea of adding wide char support to our libc? Maybe
we could port it over from {Net,Open}BSD or BSDi. This would add the
header file , etc.
- Donn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Nate Williams wrote:
>Unlike X (which rarely changes), I suspect the Motif stuff to change
>alot.
I'm unclear on what gyrations you are expecting from a mature API
codified in an IEEE standard. As long as you're using the Motif
standard interface in your code you should hav
On Tue, 16 May 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Bush Doctor wrote:
> >
> > > Out of da blue David Scheidt aka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > >
> > > > Not incidently, SCO have waived the $100 license application fee, which
> >
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the
> > crypto distribution as long as we have one.
>
> Is it? I thought the RSAref code being pluggable gave it some
> protection, or is merely "pluggability" also classifie
> No, I'm saying that OpenSource Motif *will* be going through lots of
> gyrations in the future, and these gyrations may cause instabilities in
> the JDK.
>
> But, if the JDK uses the Motif version it was compiled against, it will
> work 'consistently.
>
> Unlike X (which rarely changes), I su
> > > If this Open Motif can be distributed as a port or package for FreeBSD
> > > itself (and it seems to me that it can), then what hassle is that for
> > > JDK on FreeBSD?
> >
> >It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS
> >requires multiple packages to work.
>
> As l
At 9:35 AM -0600 5/16/00, Nate Williams wrote:
> > If this Open Motif can be distributed as a port or package for FreeBSD
> > itself (and it seems to me that it can), then what hassle is that for
> > JDK on FreeBSD?
>
>It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS
>requires m
> Which host are you pilling from? I am slurping things out of
^^^
I've seen this post now three times and I still can't remember what word
I wanted to use there. :-) It must be age I guess...
Nick
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:08:23 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
>
> > > Check it out at:
> > > http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
> >
> > Yes, that is great news! I tried compiling it, but I had trouble with
> > lib/Xm/Scale.c. It wanted to include ,
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:54:52PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the
> crypto distribution as long as we have one.
Even so, moving SSH into the bindist would be one less thing that has to
be merged into Internat all the time.
> > > I think that you no longer have to include Motif with the JDK.
> > > Just let the distribution of Motif come from freebsd.org , i.e.,
> > > a port or a package.
> >
> >Too much hassle IMO. I'd *much* rather distribute it as part of the
> >package, and I'm looking into how feasible it would
> > I think that you no longer have to include Motif with the JDK.
> > Just let the distribution of Motif come from freebsd.org , i.e.,
> > a port or a package.
>
>Too much hassle IMO. I'd *much* rather distribute it as part of the
>package, and I'm looking into how feasible it would be to distri
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Bush Doctor wrote:
>
> > Out of da blue David Scheidt aka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > >
> > > Not incidently, SCO have waived the $100 license application fee, which
> > > means that you can get your own official Ancient UNIX(TM
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> I've integrated NetBSD's langinfo and nl_types support into FreeBSD. I
> can send you patches if you haven't managed to work around this yet?
Great. Please send me the patches. BTW, by "integrated", do you mean
that you've integrated them into the b
On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:08:23 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> > Check it out at:
> > http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
>
> Yes, that is great news! I tried compiling it, but I had trouble with
> lib/Xm/Scale.c. It wanted to include , which FreeBSD
> doesn't have.
I've integrated NetBSD's langi
19 matches
Mail list logo
