> We've been implementing yarrow at zeroknowledge also. I just read
> through the freebsed-current archives searching for "yarrow", and I
> share some of the concerns raised by Kris Kennaway:
OK...
> I've been talking with John Kelsey (one of the Yarrow authors) about
> changing yarrow to suppo
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Is there a generic hash table implementation in the kernel somewhere?
Yes, see kern/kern_subr.c for hashinit() function.
--
Boris Popov
http://www.butya.kz/~bp/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current
(excuse complete ignorance as far as IDE RAID below)
For the buildbox here, I decided to go ahead with Soren's ATA-100 RAID
suggestion, and bought an Abit KT7-RAID motherboard, which has an onboard
Highpoint HPT-370 ATA-100 RAID. I'm using two 15G IBM 75GX drives on it.
So after a long day of ha
[I see my post made it]
To expand briefly on my comment about collision resistance
> - the hash function constructed from using Blowfish in CBC mode you --
> have to be careful how you use block ciphers to construct hash
> functions -- they have quite different properties. For example
>
[try again this foobared the first time -- apologies for duplicates]
[If this bounces because I am not a list member, could I trouble one
of you to forward it to the list? -- Thanks]
Hi all
We've been implementing yarrow at zeroknowledge also. I just read
through the freebsed-current archives
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Brian Dean wrote:
> If you have the time, I would very much appreciate any reviews on a
> couple of helper functions that I've put together for manipulating the
> i386 debug registers:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bsd/i386watch/
Just a note to reviewers, I've simpli
Is there a generic hash table implementation in the kernel somewhere?
If not, is there any interest in creating one?
-Archie
___
Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com
To Unsubscribe: s
> If i do a perlcc test.pl i get the folllowing , in CURRENT ?
> Must i define something beforehand, or is it broken ?
I'll take a look...
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> Is this an SMP box or a UP box in APIC mode or something strange?
As of right now all of the machines that I have tried it on are
SMP machines which prebviously worked just fine with them in. It
Under my 5.0-C setup here, the Linux netscape takes AGES to load (>5min) and
is so unresponsive, I have to kill it.
I experienced a similar problem with StarOffice 5.2, where performance was just
dog slow. Is the Linuxulator broken?
--
Cheers,
Sean
Sean-Paul Rees ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Web: http
hi.. i try to compile BitchX-1.0c16 on my FreeBSD-current 5.0. The same
version works on my old FreeBSD 4.1, but when i try to compile on 5.0...
../include/struct.h:743: `INPUT_BUFFER_SIZE' undeclared here (not in a function)
../include/struct.h:743: size of array `input_buffer' has non-integer t
$B%Y%k%H$N%P%C%/%k$K;E9~$s$@%l%s%:$+$iK\BN!J3s$J$I!K$K(B
$BEEGH$rHt$P$9J}<0$G$9!#=D(B1440$B!_2#(B960$B%T%/%;%k!##A#4MQ;f(B
$B=D$G>/$7:81&$KM>Gr$reH>?H!&2?H$NA*Br$r85$K$"$i$+$8$a%l%s(B
$B%:3QEY!"%:!<%`N($rD4@a8GDj!#$"$H$O%P%C%/%k$r?($k$h$&$K(B
$B%7%c%C%?!]J*$r#2!?#3$NHO0O(B
$B$K<}$a$k
Paul Richards wrote:
> Mark Ovens wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 02:33:44PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:59:29AM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
> > > > Is there any reason why this is unacceptable and could not be committed?
> > >
> > > Because it can be done with
Mark Ovens wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 02:33:44PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:59:29AM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
> > > Is there any reason why this is unacceptable and could not be committed?
> >
> > Because it can be done with an awk/sed script?
> >
>
> I'll f
If i do a perlcc test.pl i get the folllowing , in CURRENT ?
Must i define something beforehand, or is it broken ?
-Wl,-E -lperl -lm -L/usr/libdata/perl/5.6.0/mach/CORE -lperl -lm -lc -lcrypt
/usr/libdata/perl/5.6.0/mach/auto/IO/IO.so
/usr/libdata/perl/5.6.0/mach/auto/Fcntl/Fcntl.so
/tmp/ccJ9750
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:29:03 MST, Jos Backus wrote:
> In /etc/rc, rc.i386 is invoked before rc.devfs. This causes moused to fail to
> start for those people who use a link from /dev/ to /dev/mouse. The
> fix seems to be to switch the order of invocation:
Your problem raises another interestin
16 matches
Mail list logo
