--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Craig Rodrigues writes:
>Hi,
>
>I just did a cvsup and rebuilt my kernel, and now my kernel
>panics upon bootup. I don't have a serial console, so I wrote
>down the error messages that I saw:
>
>I saw this one in the middle of some GEOM debug statements:
>ar: FreeBS
walt wrote:
I built world+kernel about an hour ago ( Dec 17 about 23:00 UTC)
and the kernel hangs in the middle of printing phk's GEOM diagnostics:
I noticed some GEOM-related commits in today's cvsup, but unfortunately
they didn't solve this problem. The kernel still hangs before printing
a
On Wednesday, 18 December 2002 at 22:36:08 -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 19), Greg 'groggy' Lehey said:
>> I've been experiencing a lot of lockups (system completely dead, no
>> reaction at the keyboard, can't ping) on an Intel SMP machine running
>> CURRENT. Normally I do my
In the last episode (Dec 19), Greg 'groggy' Lehey said:
> I've been experiencing a lot of lockups (system completely dead, no
> reaction at the keyboard, can't ping) on an Intel SMP machine running
> CURRENT. Normally I do my kernel builds over NFS, but in the last
> few months I haven't been able
I've been experiencing a lot of lockups (system completely dead, no
reaction at the keyboard, can't ping) on an Intel SMP machine running
CURRENT. Normally I do my kernel builds over NFS, but in the last few
months I haven't been able to complete a 'make world'. Along with
-DNOCLEAN I can get a b
Hi,
I just did a cvsup and rebuilt my kernel, and now my kernel
panics upon bootup. I don't have a serial console, so I wrote
down the error messages that I saw:
I saw this one in the middle of some GEOM debug statements:
ar: FreeBSD check1 failed
Further along I saw:
Lock GEOM topology not ex
:
:On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:> Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
:> support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
:
:I still dislike it. It starts by adding style bugs to the Makefile
:(changing "=" to "+=" for the i
:Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
:I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
:than I do anyway. :-)
:
:The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
:would make sense to rip support for -s out of pstat/swapinfo (and
:integ
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 18-Dec-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
> > The pessimization that was being discussed right before that happened
> > was "harvesting entropy for /dev/random". I can provide mailing list
> > quotes about that bracketing those dates.
>
> No, the pessimization
Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
than I do anyway. :-)
The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
would make sense to rip support for -s out of pstat/swapinfo (and
integrate 'ps
> A teeny-weeny issue I would like to discuss, is that we make the pfil(9)
> hooks code default in 5.0, and remove the kernel option; this is because
> it creates problems when PFIL_HOOKS is not in the (e.g. GENERIC) kernel,
> and someone tries to load the ipfilter kernel module (ipl.ko). [1]
>
> I
Yah, there isn't a secure dist. I'm doing a full install now, to see if
it hits it. I don't understand why only installing base would work on
4.7 but not on 5.0.
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 17:57, Nate Lawson wrote:
> It sounds like you didn't install the secure dist. But I thought ssl had
> been moved
Hi all.
A teeny-weeny issue I would like to discuss, is that we make the pfil(9)
hooks code default in 5.0, and remove the kernel option; this is because
it creates problems when PFIL_HOOKS is not in the (e.g. GENERIC) kernel,
and someone tries to load the ipfilter kernel module (ipl.ko). [1]
I h
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
> support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
I still dislike it. It starts by adding style bugs to the Makefile
(changing "=" to "+=" for the initial ass
On 18 Dec 2002, Ryan Sommers wrote:
> I've been having difficulty installing 5.0 from the SP2 and RC1 images I
> created. I'm attempting to install in a virtual machine under vmware.
> For distributions I choose Custom and only choose to install the base, I
> would like to install/build&install my
I've been having difficulty installing 5.0 from the SP2 and RC1 images I
created. I'm attempting to install in a virtual machine under vmware.
For distributions I choose Custom and only choose to install the base, I
would like to install/build&install my own selection of packages later.
It gets t
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
-Matt
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/nc
:Added the enum instead of is_swap* commands and changed from kvm to
:sysctl to get the swap information.
:
:Eirik Nygaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:PGP Key: 83C55EDE
All right, I found a couple more bugs and fleshed it out a bit.
You got your LINKS and MLINKS reversed and forgot a +=,
you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 12/14/02 23:13:
> I have a patch here which makes the IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT tunable
> at module load time using a kernel environment variable. Looks to me
> that it would do what you want.
Should we think about kldload logic change ?
Loading modules giving th
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:58:59AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> You know, whoever you are, you must lead a very sad, paranoid,
> sit-in-the-corner-the-world-is-out-to-get-me life if you think you
> are actually accomplishing something here. You are probably the
> same idiot who p
live10girls
¼ºÇö¾Æ ´©µåÁý °ø°³
http://www.live10girls.com/index.asp?ID=5621228";
target=_blank>http://news.hot.co.kr/2002/12/09/200212092151172100_1.jpg";
border="0">
http://www.live10girls.com/index.asp?ID=5621228";
target=_blank>http://news.hot.co.kr/2002/12/09/20021209215117
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Please send me a `dumpfs /usr | head -50' output of the filesystem
> under the current system. Then clean it up with fsck and run the
> same command again. Finally, boot up under the old kernel and
> get the output both before and after fsck cleaning. Wha
I've run into similar problems dual-booting 4.x and 5.x. Is there
some utility one can use to synchronize this once and for all?
IMHO, when the UFS1 superblock was changed, it should have been named
something else like UFS1_1 to avoid confusion.
gtf
--
Geoffrey T. Falk, BSc, MA, SCJ2P, SCSSadm7,
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
I don't care who hacked what; get over it, grow up, and move on.
William Michael Grim
Student, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville
Unix System Administrator, SIUE, Computer Science dept.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matt Dillon wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:22:09 -0
> From: "Craig Reyenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I can't believe this thread is still polluting the email system. 386's are
> old, slow, and virtually useless. I think that the time wasted on supporting
> junk hardware would be better spent on utilising the features and
> capabilities of new hardware.
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:09:10 -0800 Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think anyone wants that to happen
> (though I wouldn't put it past
> some people to want to do that).
FWIW, all I've really been doing is defending the idea that some people want
the code to run on a 386, howeve
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:47:24 -0800 Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * De: Terry Lambert [ Data: 2002-12-17 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: 80386 out of GENERIC ]
> > Apparently, one of the primary markets for
> FreeBSD is embedded
> > devices.
>
> Are you implying that these people, who are
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:50:42AM -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> I have managed to panic my system on a hard reboot and now believe
> that I have found the problem on which you are faulting. I have
> checked in a fix to the head of the tree (sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c
> version 1.57). Let me know i
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:18:24AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :I have made a small patch, added l, s and h switches to show
> :information about the swap devices. And the U switch to swapctl only
> :to remove all activated swap devices.
> :If anything else is needed let me know and I will ad
I can't believe this thread is still polluting the email system. 386's are
old, slow, and virtually useless. I think that the time wasted on supporting
junk hardware would be better spent on utilising the features and
capabilities of new hardware. As someone mentioned, if you want to use crap
hardw
Marcus Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> found a pair of bad bugs in the
GBDE code which could result in corrupt data under some circumstances.
The two separate bug was in the mapping code which decides where
to put the encrypted sectors on the device.
One bug affected only certain multi lock configurati
I have managed to panic my system on a hard reboot and now believe
that I have found the problem on which you are faulting. I have
checked in a fix to the head of the tree (sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c
version 1.57). Let me know if it fixes your problem.
Kirk McKusick
To Unsubscribe: send m
:I have made a small patch, added l, s and h switches to show
:information about the swap devices. And the U switch to swapctl only
:to remove all activated swap devices.
:If anything else is needed let me know and I will add it.
:
:--=20
:
:Eirik Nygaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:PGP Key: 83C55EDE
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
You know, whoever you are, you must lead a very sad, paranoid,
sit-in-the-corner-the-world-is-out-to-get-me life if you think you
are actually accomplishing something here. You are probably the
same idiot who posts all that anonymous-coward BSD-Is-Dying junk
to Slashdot. I wou
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 02:47:51PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :
> :How about renaming swapon(8) into swapctl(8) after this function
> enhancemen=
> :t?
> :This name reflects it's purpose much better and would be consistent
> with the
> :other BSDs.
> :
> :- Christian
>
> I am not voluntee
Hello !
If you're like me, you've tried EVERYTHING to lose
weight. I know how you feel - the special diets,
miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped
me lose a pound either. It seemed like the harder I tried,
the bigger I got, until I heard about a product called
Power Diet Plus.
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2002-12-18 at 16:35:24 Julian Stacey wrote:
>
> JS> With 5.0-RC1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 is not installed by `cd
> JS> /usr/src;make install` the date stamp remains old.
>
> Yes it is, but it isn't modified if the freshly compiled file is
> exactly the same as the cur
> sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0
> sio0: type 16550A
> sio1 port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
> sio1: type 16550A
> sio2: configured irq 10 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
> sio2: port may not be enabled
> sio2 port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 10 on acpi0
> sio2: type 16550A
>
> I've tried setting hint.sio
Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 4:15 PM +0100 12/15/02, Petr Holub wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I tried to compile arla 0.35.11 on FreeBSD 5.0-RC1. First I got
>>following error:
[...]
>>Then configre and make proceeds until it stops on error shown
>>below my signature. Can anybody help?
>
>
> By hard shutdown I assume you mean hitting the reset button while
> the machine is busily running along? If so, my test machine passes
> that test. I'll keep plugging away at it though in the hopes of
> getting it to fail.
>
> Kirk McKusick
Yes, that's what I meant. My main box is a la
On 18-Dec-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>> This has nothing to do with /dev/random. Please stop with the constant
>> FUDing Terry.
>
>| Revision 1.296 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Jan 14
>| 10:11:10 2001 UTC (23 months ago) by jhb
>| Branch: MAIN
>| Chang
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2002-12-18 at 16:35:24 Julian Stacey wrote:
JS> With 5.0-RC1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 is not installed by `cd
JS> /usr/src;make install` the date stamp remains old.
Yes it is, but it isn't modified if the freshly compiled file is
exactly the same
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:00:19AM -0800, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> I corrected a botched patch last night. Make sure that you are running
> with version 1.56 2002/12/18 07:19:41 of ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c.
>
> Kirk McKusick
>
> =-=-=-=-=
>
nebula# ident /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c
/u
I corrected a botched patch last night. Make sure that you are running
with version 1.56 2002/12/18 07:19:41 of ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c.
Kirk McKusick
=-=-=-=-=
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:43:25 +0100
From: Aurelien Nephtali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMA
With 5.0-RC1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 is not installed by `cd
/usr/src;make install` the date stamp remains old.
(Most other stuff is installed, except kerberos & _p.a libs etc)
Presumably make world will update it (running now),
but it shouldn't need a `world' just an `install' IMO.
Julian Stac
÷ Wed, 18.12.2002, × 18:17, van den Berg, Courteney ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> Has anyone here seen slow down problems when running RC1 as a guest OS
> on Vmware (GSX or Workstation)? After about 2 minutes of normal running
> the VM slows to an absolute crawl. On the host the processor sits at
> 100% with almost
Hi,
Has anyone here seen slow down problems when running RC1 as a guest OS
on Vmware (GSX or Workstation)? After about 2 minutes of normal running
the VM slows to an absolute crawl. On the host the processor sits at
100% with almost 100% of it kernel time. The exact amount of time
required to slow
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Leif Neland wrote:
But still, would it be impossible to have both a GENERIC and a GENERIC386
kernel in the distribution?
Impossible, no... but would anyone use it? Seems to me that it would
just take up space. And it's one more thing for the build gurus to keep
a configuration for (though ma
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:56:19 -0800
Does anyone know why this person is trying to (poorly)
impersonate MD?
Unfortunately not. We do not yet know who this fake Dillon
is (the guy posting from that backplane.com address)
I've been working hard on the new ipfw[2] patch for 5.0,
the new patch is
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
> I introduced a bug to snapshots on 11/30/02 which did not get fixed
> until 12/15/02 which caused background fsck to (silently) fail to fix
> certain filesystem problems. If you ran background fsck on a system
> between 11/30 and 12/15 and then ran background fsck again on a system
> after that
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:33:42PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:05:40AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > > I suppose it would be a good idea to include an alternatvie i386
> > > kernel on the CD-ROM. There may be a sp
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have a problem getting CURRENT to find my ISA SMC Ultra ethernet
> > card. No matter what I do I can't stop the kernel finding a third
> > sio device on top of the memory and interrupt that the ed card
> > occupies. The ke
On 18-Dec-2002 (07:33:03/GMT) Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> But what about rar/unrar ports that overwrite one each other?
> I don't know what you mean here.
Try to install /usr/ports/archivers/{rar,unrar} in any order...
And then (or even better, before then) look at installed files:
# cd /usr/ports/
61 matches
Mail list logo
