:> >#define VM_METER VM_TOTAL
This change was part of a larger patch set. I have no particular
objection to adding the #define or renaming VM_TOTAL back to VM_METER,
but I *WILL* point out that even without a name change the VM cnt
structure has changed so often that for al
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Mark Murray wrote:
> [ Very large SNIP ]
>
> Scott Long wrote:
> > I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like to see
> > 5.0->5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read
> > my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happen
* De: David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-18 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: VM_METER no longer defined? ]
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > a line like
> >
> > #warning "VM_METER is deprecated and will be removed on k
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> a line like
>
> #warning "VM_METER is deprecated and will be removed on kluctember 43, 2861"
>
> would be nice to, of course. =-)
I wanted this, but I don't know who to implement it so that it only
prints out IIF VM_METER is used some
Mark Murray wrote:
[ Very large SNIP ]
Scott Long wrote:
>I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like
to see
>5.0->5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read
>my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened.
Fair enough.
>Also, it's
[ Very large SNIP ]
Scott Long wrote:
> I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like to see
> 5.0->5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read
> my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened.
Fair enough.
> Also, it's common practice to d
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:20, Scott Long wrote:
>Hiten Pandya wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words
>>in effect of:
>>
>>
>>>Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:23:30AM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
> VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks a few
> ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
I committed a work around -- vm_
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 04:02:00PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > Ok, I agree that the naming could cause confusion since there is a
> > vmmeter struct and a vmtotal struct. However, the Release Engineering
> > policy that was set out at the start of RELENG_5_0 is that public API
> > changes
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:20, Scott Long wrote:
> Hiten Pandya wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words
> > in effect of:
> >
> > >Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Of
Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words
in effect of:
>Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
>>>gratuitous and it brea
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words in effect of:
> Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
> >
> >>Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
> >>gratuitous and it breaks standard compatabili
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > Index: vm_param.h
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/vm/vm_param.h,v
> > retrieving revision 1.16
> > diff -u -r1.16 vm_param.h
> > --- vm_param.h 2003/01/
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
>Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
>gratuitous and it breaks standard compatability rules: deprecate
>for one major version and remove in the second. I haven't seen
>any reason w
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
> Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
> gratuitous and it breaks standard compatability rules: deprecate
> for one major version and remove in the second. I haven't seen
> any reason why this couldn't be ad
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:02:07PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> It looks like Matt did this to fix vm.vmtotal. From sys/vm/vm_param.h:
>
> Make 'sysctl vm.vmtotal' work properly using updated patch from Hiten.
> (the patch in the PR was stale).
>
> It looks to have been replaced by VM_TOTAL
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 12:42, Scott Long wrote:
> Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> > Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
> > VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks
> > a few
> > ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
> >
> I've g
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:42:27AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> I've got to admit that this one slipped in under my radar. Would the
> committer and submitter please give an explanation of why VM_METER
> was changed?
The commit which removed VM_METER is here:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks
a few
ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
I've got to admit that this one slipped in under my radar. Would the
committ
Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks a few
ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
--
Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - "In Unix veritas"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
20 matches
Mail list logo
