On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 20:50, w.schwarzenfeld wrote:
>
> see:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242053
Thank you. CCed myself.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mail
FWIW I still have this problem. Is this a known issue or should I be
properly debugging this?
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 23:56, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
> When compiling devel/binutils I get the following error. What am I
> missing or is it a known bug?
>
> [00:00:34] ld: error: u
/RELEASE_801/final 366581) (based on
LLVM 8.0.1)
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe,
sd.org
COMMENT= gem5 Simulator System
BUILD_DEPENDS= swig3.0:devel/swig30 \
[4813 02:40:59.449 eax@fasteagle .../svn/ports/emulators/gem5]∴svn ci
-F log -- Makefile
SendingMakefile
Transmitting file data .done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 481594.
@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > # MAINTAINER= cr...@freebsd.org
> > #
> >
> >+EDITOR=${EDITOR:-vi}
> > PORTSDIR=${PORTSDIR:-/usr/ports}
> > INDEX=${PORTSDIR}/`make -C ${PORTSDIR} -V INDEXFILE`
>
> Thanks both.
>
> Feel free to commit, but please use the absolute path to
ping?
On 3 June 2018 at 17:43, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 16 May 2018 at 22:28, Christopher Hall
> wrote:
>> Hello Eitan,
>>
>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 21:32:20 -0700, Eitan Adler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ping?
>>>
>>> On 12 May 2018 at 06:06
On 9 June 2018 at 11:47, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Java,
>
> I've prepared three ports for Linux Oracle Java 10.
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228848
>
> If nobody objects, I'll commit this.
On 16 May 2018 at 22:28, Christopher Hall wrote:
> Hello Eitan,
>
> On Wed, 16 May 2018 21:32:20 -0700, Eitan Adler
> wrote:
>
>> ping?
>>
>> On 12 May 2018 at 06:06, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> > Can anyone explain why pkg wants to both install and autoremo
> What change would be needed ? There's already a Sponsored by field ?
My point is that the custom patch pre-fills the field, which is why
submitters often see it filled when they don't expect it: the
committer doesn't do it by hand.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 18 May 2018 at 04:40, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> On 2018/05/18 00:43, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 17 May 2018 at 21:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to qualify
>>>> "Sponsored
atically append it to the default
template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ping?
On 12 May 2018 at 06:06, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Can anyone explain why pkg wants to both install and autoremove the
> same packages?
>
> [8212 11:56:42.045 eax@fasteagle ~]∴sudo pkg autoremove
> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
> Deinstallation has been requested
libepoxy-1.4.3...
[4/4] Extracting libepoxy-1.4.3: 100%
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 22 April 2018 at 13:20, Pete Wright wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2018 12:57 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
> On 25 November 2017 at 10:50, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got the port to a working state (
>> https://github.com/cheffo/FreeBSD-Por
On 25 November 2017 at 10:50, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got the port to a working state (
> https://github.com/cheffo/FreeBSD-Ports/tree/master/net-mgmt/chronograf)
What happened to this effort? I'd love to see a chronograf p
st on behalf of ports-secteam. Maintainers rarely verify the
hashes that makesum generates.
I wish we can go further and filter out non-HTTPS sites during makesum.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
consider
> updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are again
> supported.
FYI: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/tab-groups-panorama/
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.fre
On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit :
>> On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM
On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
wrote:
> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
>> wrote:
>>> So I have a couple of ports, science/cdf and graphics/opendx, which have
>>
d (listed
here: https://spdx.org/licenses/) we should add it to the main
database.
> An even tougher one is math/octave-forge-optim, where each individual
> file has its own license.
A "custom" license that merely states to check the distfiles should be
s
On 5 February 2016 at 15:33, jungle Boogie wrote:
> Any other ideas knowing I have a more recent version of ports tree now?
What is PORTSDIR set to? Where is your ports tree?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
;t working well.
Do you have a complete ports tree somewhere on your system? If so,
make sure to set PORTSDIR correctly. If not you'll want to check out
a copy from subversion.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.
submit it to the
> docs@ team and b) answer any questions I might stumble across in the
> process.
I am willing to do (a) and help with any aspect of (b) that I can.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebs
sd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-update-server/
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
also https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2761 for adding the list of
team members to the https://www.freebsd.org/administration.html page
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ged upstream ports provided they have an
active downstream maintainer. The only concern is patches: the ports
tree must not become a repo by which the upstream port is continued to
be developed. If you just want to make sure that the port remains
"available" this is perfectly fi
On 29 June 2014 19:37, Gea-Suan Lin wrote:
> Hello sir,
>
> I would like to drop all ports maintainship, please reset to ports@
> and perl@ (or other alias).
I will take of this. Thank you for all the effort you have put in to
helping our community.
--
hich there is only a
single upstream location. Larger ports with better upstream
infrastructure typically already have multiple MASTER_SITES.
It adds noise when looking for "ports with portlint issues".
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
I'm not a maintainer myself, but I guess that people won't be happy to have
> their maintainership reset if they actually did their job.
Agreed.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
anly. Preliminary testing ok. (also uses lmdb)
> www/phpbb3 - Changing PORTVERSION=3.0.11 to 3.0.12 and building is ok too.
portscout is supposed to take this role.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
e
> still interested.
>
> BR,
> Muhammad
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Koichiro IWAO wrote:
>>
>> I'm not a perl specialist but I'd like to help something I can do.
>>
>> It looks someone already works on auto assignment. I'll wai
equirements
are simple but someone that knows perl needs to volunteer to help :)
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
h a complete patch
> just to wait for some months and seeing that nothing happens. And even after
> offering help it is closed with "timeout" and the bug still exists.
Before we couldn't track this. Now we can. Lets hope w
On 3 June 2014 16:13, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 3 June 2014 10:11, John Marino wrote:
>>
>>> ... it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are
>>> about to make a meaningful report...
>>>
>>
>> Thi
t.
This isn't about spam but about the need to engage bug reporters.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
email from
accounts that don't exist (as opposed to creating them). We'll
consider this as time goes on.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
end-pr involves a
manual step).
===
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
fy in an email
> response to get it to a state people will look at it. That would eliminate
> the whole "oh no, one more account/password" hassle, but reduce spam and lack
> of working back channels.
See above:
===
To preempt the next question: why don't we allow users
killing anonymous means killing trivial bug reporting,
> but if that was the case: Oh well, I guess we have to focus on
> non-trivial bugs.
Trivial bugs are important too.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e supported for a
bit as we get used to bugzilla. It certainly on the cards to support
in the future.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
d that hurt for building ports?
> Or do I worry needlessly?
It only matters if you build ports that interact with "private system
internals". For example, anything that builds a kernel module and
lsof. Generally, you should be fine.
--
Eitan Adler
_
On 11 March 2014 08:22, John Marino wrote:
> On 3/11/2014 13:16, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 11 March 2014 07:05, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> To be able to migrate most of the zip files to use bsdtar when they case we
>>> have
>
ction of the format which it is
unzipping.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Distribution requires acceptance of license agreement
> +NO_PACKAGE=${NO_CDROM}
Works for me. Make sure /usr/ports/LEGAL says the same thing.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
; port?
The last adobe security report I see was issued on 2014-02-04:
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-04.html
I'll update flash to .336. Thanks for the email.
--
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugm
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:30:09PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>
>> I think train wreck applies more to sendmail than send-pr. Sendmail
>> dates back to long-ago pre-Internet days where computer users didn't
>> send email to other computer
ork. A lot of
this will have to be repeated once the bugs are re-imported, but at
least it should take a lot less time now that I've done it once.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
ould have died in a fire a long time ago.
Agreed. There is active work on moving to bugzilla instead of GNATS.
I can't give a definite timeline but it should be 'soon'.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Ping. After 2 weeks.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At the moment WITH_DEBUG is treated specially by the ports system. I
> propose to turn the old WITH_DEBUG into a port option 'DEBUG' which is
> understood by the port system as a wh
questions please feel to email ports@ and cc me.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
re worked fine.
>
> what to Do?
Please run the following as the *user* (not root) and paste the output
from them:
nspluginwrapper -a -v -i
nspluginwrapper -a -v -u
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
*:N-fno-strict*} ${DEBUG_FLAGS}
+CFLAGS+= ${DEBUG_CFLAGS}
+CXXFLAGS+= ${DEBUG_CXXFLAGS}
+CPPFLAGS+= ${DEBUG_CPPFLAGS}
.endif
+.endif
.if defined(WITH_SSP) || defined(WITH_SSP_PORTS)
.include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.ssp.mk"
--
Eitan Adler
___
freeb
one / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
> - x11-wm/icewm (marked as IGNORE)
> ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 1 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed
> ---> Session ended at: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:59:59 +0200 (consumed 00:00:03)
--
Eitan Adler
___
fre
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> # make DESTDIR=/root/tmpdest install
> ===> Creating some important subdirectories
Are you sure you don't mean "make PREFIX=/root/tmpdest/" ?
--
Eitan Adler
___
f
quot;
.endif # defined(TMPDIR)
+.if defined(WITH_DEBUG_PORTS) && ${WITH_DEBUG_PORTS:M${PKGORIGIN}}
+WITH_DEBUG=yes
+.endif
+
# Reset value from bsd.own.mk.
.if defined(WITH_DEBUG) && !defined(WITHOUT_DEBUG)
STRIP= #none
--
Eitan Adler
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Darren Pilgrim
wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 8:25 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> That's parseable using the regex or literal matching built into every
> scripting language, most programming languages, and your average human.
Sure, but it requires extra tooling t
. We should use an existing format. (I don't care
which one: YAML, JSON, ...) ?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
into to many places (pkg_desc seams
> a proper place to have such information), why have the Makefile double up
> as a database?
pkg_descr is free form. Makefiles are parsable (make -V).
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2013-11-14 14:53:29 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
>>
>>> run `nspluginwrapper -a -v -i` now.
>>>
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>
ld not validate the data.
In the past I've argued for option B as the amount of data we could
add is endless.
Since the primary consumer would be PC-BSD or other package management
tools which would you prefer?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freeb
w would be a
good time to fix it.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Please do not top post: it makes it impossible to follow a conversation.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Where is this documented? (I am making a port that needs do similar stuff
> but want to understand all the possible directives)
It is documented in
http://www.freebsd.
HTML preview) for the
> porters-handbook document to address this problem. Note that some of
> the contents have been already updated by Eitan Adler, this is just a
> continuation of the work.
>
> [1]
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pgj/patches/2013/10/29/porters-handbook.staging.di
a different one for ports that you
>> have portconf stuff for. I stopped investigating at that point :|
>
> Maybe my English is poor, I do not understand your message. Please
> clarify. Thx
Translation:
bmake and portconf are not compatible. On
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
>
> I'm interested by x11/tilda
> - regads
Done!
Note that this port needs some work done: in particular it needs
"STAGEDIR support"
See here for more details: https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/St
sending side, not sure) so I'll abandon trying to inline them. Future
> changes will probably be distributed as proper patches.
Thanks!
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
anyway, will it turn on? I'm happy to
>> (slowly) test it there.
>
> AFAIU, it's pointless to use stack protector on ppc because stack smashing
> attacks are just impossible here.
Could you explain why?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
res, as well as the use of unsupported features.
This is really good work. Thanks!
--
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
after it was changed.
IMHO it should be removed now.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
the ports/x11/xinit/Makefile (at line
> 7) seem to let it build:
>
> GNU_CONFIGURE=yes
> CONFIGURE_ARGS= --without-launchd
Any chance you could give us a copy of the 'config.log' file left in
the ports directory and a list of ports you have installed. It seems
odd that thi
t; look there.
fwiw, CHANGES does mention it, but this is a developer's file not a user's file.
I just modified the ports man page in HEAD and will MFC it shortly.
However, because the ports system is decoupled from base the man page
tends to
ke
.if ${OSVERSION} > ${WHEREEVERITBROKE}
BROKEN= Unit tests fail
.endif
to the port's Makefile.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
calls bash like that when it crashes, so that it can
> generate a crash report of some kind and possibly submit it somewhere.
Even so, it should be listed as a depends.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
different bug
system and this is where most of the focus lies now.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
0 or 50 configurable options, then
> they certainly can take the time to fully document them.
support for this file, called pkg-help, is on the way.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
f time and effort on
your part.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 30 April 2013 13:52, Chris Rees wrote:
> This proposes running each regex over each file in turn.
"or some variant thereof" - if that is really a big deal the regex
could be modified to do all of them at once.
We could even run the regex on just the first line.
--
On 30 April 2013 13:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:38:03PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 30 April 2013 13:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> > All of this will be damn slow operations, we want to keep this as fast as
>> > possible, even
is why I ended with "I guess it isn't too bad.", although I
guess it wasn't clear I meant needing lang_FILES.
I'd prefer shebangfix_FILES and have all the language fixes apply
without needing to specify which one.
--
Eitan Adler
___
l of USES=shebangfix:perl:python:php etc.
I'm also not sure about the lang_FILES=. Applying the sed (assuming
it can be made specific enough) to the entire tree would be nice, but
may take too long, especially on large work directories. I guess it
isn't too bad.
--
Eitan Adler
___
in this error: note that if refers to a command, not to
file's existence. You were missing [ -e $file ].
As others of had said, this is uneeded though.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On 25 March 2013 10:49, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Eitan Adler ha scritto:
>> This is insufficient to include, say, line 212:
>>
>> "raknet-*devel/raknetOriginal license is
>> Indy license, special authorization granted to provide RakNet un
On 25 March 2013 10:37, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Eitan Adler ha scritto:
>> The LEGAL file is for a broader set of things than just RESTRICTED.
>> It covers "no commercial use" which is NO_CDROM but not RESTRICTED
>
> Yup, LEGAL is both NO_CDROM and RESTRICTED, and REST
On 25 March 2013 10:08, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Eitan Adler ha scritto:
>> RESTRICTED does not cover "special permission granted to distribute"
>> and other not-a-restriction things.
>
> And why do we need them? RESTRICTED is for !distributable, exactly as
> the LEG
On 25 March 2013 09:36, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Eitan Adler ha scritto:
>> I have been trying to capture the differences between LEGAL and the ports
>> tree.
>> At this point I am convinced we need a new variable to capture in a
>> machine usable way issues such as &qu
CKAGE_BUILDING))
IGNORE=has to be built manually: ${MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD}
clean:
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I'm following up and will act as needed. Thanks for the heads up.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
use $CC
instead of 'cc' you will need to provide the Makefile as an attachment
so we can see what it is doing.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
mark all the failures, and
then flip the switch? This may have to be done recursively, but most
of the major blockers have already been marked.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
${BUILD_DEPENDS} without also setting
BUILD_DEPENDS, not using "RUN_DEPENDS:= ${BUILD_DEPENDS}" in general.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, s
rts should explicitly duplicate RUN_DEPENDS.
This also reduces the chance of making an error should BUILD_DEPENDS
change to be inconsistent with BUILD_DEPENDS.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
Can you please sanity check the following?
commit 687519c34ad3423752268a0a20d079fda9cea8b2
Author: Eitan Adler
Date: Fri Feb 22 18:43:30 2013 -0500
Using CONFIGURE_ENV for CPPFLAGS and
LDFLAGS is not needed since r282433.
PR: docs/174827
Submitted by: Dominique
On 6 February 2013 15:03, Armin Pirkovitsch wrote:
> On 02/06/13 14:26, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 6 February 2013 08:21, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:13:54AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>>> On 6 February 2013 07:41, Frederic Culot wrot
On 6 February 2013 08:21, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:13:54AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 6 February 2013 07:41, Frederic Culot wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> FEATURES. It is likely to be easy to grep (as opposed to USE).
>>
>> --
&g
On 6 February 2013 07:41, Frederic Culot wrote:
...
FEATURES. It is likely to be easy to grep (as opposed to USE).
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
)
>> >
>> > The very long term goal will be to switch as much code as possible
>> > to be turn into a feature (when it makes sens of course)
>> >
>> Are you saying that some USE_BLAH=yes will stick around or do I
>> misunderstand?
>>
>> Anoth
On 4 February 2013 13:26, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> # pkg delete -f kdemultimedia-4\* kdenetwork-4\* kde-workspace-4\*
> kde-runtime-4\*
> Package(s) not found!
>
>
>
> is there any wildcard support for the new pkg?
pkg help delete
use the -g flag for glob or -x or -X
than just stopping the dialog. It changes how
patch(1) behaves, it adds BATCH=yes to the environment, disables some
ports, etc.
Instead define NO_DIALOG in /etc/make.conf
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
; UPDATING document as well?
The issue was 'fixed' in the sense of the filename is now 3.1.13, so
manual interference is not required. It is not fully correct though
because PORTVERSION is still completely wrong.
--
Eitan Adler
___
free
ee the Porters' Handbook section 5.8.
>>
>>
>> I think you need :patch here, to get the patched version.
>
>
> Thanks. The target :patch was corect.
> Actually writing it in PATCH_DEPENDS went well.
Is xorg's source required to patch this port
1 - 100 of 447 matches
Mail list logo