On Wednesday 16 July 2008 13:41:46 Edward Sutton wrote:
I have had a very hard time trying to debug which has hindered my work on
some projects. In particular I have had trouble properly grasping how to
work with debugging multi threaded applications, memory errors, and stack
corruption. I
I have had a very hard time trying to debug which has hindered my work on
some projects. In particular I have had trouble properly grasping how to work
with debugging multi threaded applications, memory errors, and stack
corruption. I know that it is not a five minute learning process to
HiFreebsd
We have C/C++ Applications Developer multiple openings in different locations.
Locations: Ashburn, VA (openings-4)
Location: Denver, CO(openings-3)
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO (openings-5)
Location: Colorado Springs, CO (openings-10)
Location: Clinton
hi,
have anybody obtained success in install C/C++ pack for Netbeans 5.5 on
freeBSD? because on netbeans's site there is no available pack for OS
independent distribution. could anyone tell me if there is any ports that do
it
thanks
--
Willy Tiengo
On Saturday 21 January 2006 15:33, John Levine wrote:
Other than 'grep'ing dmesg, is there a way to know the current cpu such as
a struct with the machine's cpu and cpu feature (kinda like a time_t
struct)?
$ sysctl hw.model
hw.model: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
If you want more
Nicolas,
I have commented assembler code for the intel family of CPU's. This code
goes back to the i386 and also takes into account the CPU string, and will
calculate the clock speed. I do call this as a library function from c/c++
programs.
Unfortunately this is written for Microsoft's
On Sunday 22 January 2006 19:53, Derek Ragona wrote:
Nicolas,
I have commented assembler code for the intel family of CPU's. This code
goes back to the i386 and also takes into account the CPU string, and will
calculate the clock speed. I do call this as a library function from c/c
Other than 'grep'ing dmesg, is there a way to know the current cpu such as a
struct with the machine's cpu and cpu feature (kinda like a time_t struct)?
Portability is not really an issue (though I would be nice if it could run on
BSD/linux systems).
For example, on one of my systems (from
Other than 'grep'ing dmesg, is there a way to know the current cpu such as a
struct with the machine's cpu and cpu feature (kinda like a time_t struct)?
$ sysctl hw.model
hw.model: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
If you want more details write a tiny assembler routine that does a
CPUID
On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:33 PM, John Levine wrote:
Other than 'grep'ing dmesg, is there a way to know the current cpu
such as a
struct with the machine's cpu and cpu feature (kinda like a time_t
struct)?
$ sysctl hw.model
hw.model: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
If you want more details
On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:33 PM, John Levine wrote:
Other than 'grep'ing dmesg, is there a way to know the current cpu
such as a
struct with the machine's cpu and cpu feature (kinda like a time_t
struct)?
$ sysctl hw.model
hw.model: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
If you want more details
Chuck Robey wrote:
JD Arnold wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based
On 2006-01-14 13:00, JD Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
At one point in my career (in school, lisp programming) I
learned/used emacs. I admit, it's got so much power, there
isn't even a close competitor. BUT at that time, I had a
genius girl programmer at my side, and
On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JD Arnold wrote:
That's why you should graduate to Emacs - with the makefile syntax
highlighting, you'll at least see the differences between tabs and
spaces before getting into trouble due to bad whitespacing!-)
you're certainly
--- Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JD Arnold wrote:
That's why you should graduate to Emacs -
with the makefile syntax
highlighting, you'll at least see the
differences between tabs and
spaces before getting into
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in
Le 08/01/2006 à 18:37:33+0100, Kiffin Gish a écrit
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:26 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
Yes please:
JD Arnold wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small
On 1/9/06, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has a great deal of truth to
it, but I guess what scares folks is the horrible, horrible emacs
learning curve,. At one point in my career (in school, lisp
programming) I learned/used emacs. I admit, it's
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated.
--
Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:43:49PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote:
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated.
Flame away
On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:26 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger.
--
Kiffin
Kiffin Gish wrote:
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated.
What would be the best IDE can I nor anybody else on this list tell you,
it's
*cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger.
vim, emacs + make + gcc is all you need.
___
--- Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks
and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE
available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly
appreciated.
This is obviously a trick question, because real
This is obviously a trick question, because real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are designed for, easy ways
to combine them to form more
On 08/01/06 Vladimir Tsvetkov said:
To me the ideal IDE is actually a toolkit:
I believe Unix's original name was PTB, the Programmer's ToolBox. Hence why
Unix usually _is_ my IDE.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
Hello!
Does anyone know C/C++ Editors/IDEs for X11 under FreeBSD with auto code
completion and for example information boxes about the parameters of functions
etc. (like NetBeans)?
I've read that eclipse with CDT should do that but it doesn't work here... :-(
Many Thanks in advance!!!
Lukas
On 10/26/05, Lukas Razik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know C/C++ Editors/IDEs for X11 under FreeBSD with auto code
completion and for example information boxes about the parameters of
functions etc.
Emacs can do autocompletion, and you can use etags for finding
functions etc. I
vittorio wrote:
Working usually under kde I'm looking for something similar to the llc-win32
program under ms-windows - that is a development environment where you can
edit your c++ program, compile it, debug it step by step, and finally run it
in a suitable window.
I tried the nice editor
,
then to the next error, etc.
- Interactively debug C, C++, Perl, Python, or LISP programs,
line by line -- working as a control program for GNU gdb
and that's only a minor subset of the features it has.
Well, as a matter of fact I'm obliged at wok to use windows but my pet OS
On 2005-10-23 12:52, vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my freebsd portable I have xemacs that is sensitive to many
environments (I use it for the statiscal program R and for pdflatex)
among which C++ . In fact the C++ program I edit triggers a C++
menu and many options among which there
On 10/23/05, Johnny Billquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
emacs can do anything. Put it might not be graphical enough for your taste
if you come from Windows...
I agree that Emacs rocks. I come from a Windows background and
appreciated the control, and just plain coolness of Emacs. Took a
little
vittorio wrote:
Working usually under kde I'm looking for something similar to the llc-win32
program under ms-windows - that is a development environment where you can
edit your c++ program, compile it, debug it step by step, and finally run it
in a suitable window.
I tried the nice editor
Working usually under kde I'm looking for something similar to the llc-win32
program under ms-windows - that is a development environment where you can
edit your c++ program, compile it, debug it step by step, and finally run it
in a suitable window.
I tried the nice editor kate which allows to
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, vittorio wrote:
Working usually under kde I'm looking for something similar to the llc-win32
program under ms-windows - that is a development environment where you can
edit your c++ program, compile it, debug it step by step, and finally run it
in a suitable window.
I
On Saturday 22 October 2005 03:07 pm, vittorio wrote:
Working usually under kde I'm looking for something similar to the
llc-win32 program under ms-windows - that is a development environment
where you can edit your c++ program, compile it, debug it step by step, and
finally run it in a
Hello Johnny,
Is there anything of the kind of llc-win32?
I would give a try to wscite, http://www.scintilla.org/. It's a nice
graphical editor, very configurable, supports almost any language
syntax hihglighting, supports multitabbed windows and runs on unixes
and windows. You can configure
On Sat, Sat, 22 Oct 2005 22:07:19 +0200 (GMT)
vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working usually under kde I'm looking for something similar to the
llc-win32 program under ms-windows - that is a development
environment where you can edit your c++ program, compile it, debug it
step by step, and
On 2005-10-22 22:07 vittorio wrote:
Working usually under kde I'm looking for something similar to the llc-win32
program under ms-windows - that is a development environment where you can
edit your c++ program, compile it, debug it step by step, and finally run it
in a suitable window.
I
do the following:
- Edit the source code (with syntax highlighting if need be)
- Compile (with the hit of a single key, once configured)
- Parse compiler output and move to the file/line of an error,
then to the next error, etc.
- Interactively debug C, C++, Perl
(SIGL)
for FreeBSD.
Ch can now be freely downloaded from
http://www.softintegration.com/download/
Best regards,
Xiaodong
Xiaodong Zhou, PhD
http://www.softintegration.com
Ch: a C/C++ interpreter for cross-platform scripting, shell programming,
2D/3D plotting, numerical computing
I'am interesing in becoming BSD tester or alfa tester, how I can get
information about job positions in BSD development.
FreeBSD is created and developed by volunteers rather than paid staff.
To get a job in BSD development, you would have to get a job in a
company that is using FreeBSD (or
I'am interesing in becoming BSD tester or alfa tester, how I can get information about
job positions in BSD development.
Thanks
Ricardo Balda
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Alex Kelly wrote:
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is
newer and more advanced than C, will it replace C? If so,
should I learn C++ and forget C?
Good advice:
Have a look at Bruce
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Alex Kelly wrote:
Good advice:
Have a look at Bruce Eckel's free, though excellent, electronic
books at
http://mindview.net/Books/
Thinking in C++
and get started. FreeBSD's built in gcc should do all you need
for the beginning.
There's no way, IMO, that you can learn
many different ways to re-use code. Even cutting and
pasting, which is essentially what the STL does. (correct me if
I am wrong)
If you are going to re-use code, at least be organized, make
a good interface, and don't re-invent the wheel unless you
have to. C, C++, whatever.
Using C++ implies
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:01:54 -0800
abowhill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I missing something here? When does C have OO capability?
Structs don't count. What about inheritance and polymorphism?
That's in the implementation AND application. Just because you CAN
access part of a lowly
I hate to seem like a jerk, but I get these messages through the list
already, and see no reason to get them in multiple boxes. Please feel
free to continue this discussion on list, but please take this email
out of the recipients list. I will join in when I am able. Granted
that doesn't
will join in when I am able. Granted
that doesn't guarantee I'll agree with everyone, but then it wouldn't
be much of a discussion, would it? :)
Please take it out of freebsd-questions altogether and move it to
freebsd-chat or personal email or a c/c++ list.
Thanks,
Viktor
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:00:33PM -0500, Lucas Holt wrote:
I'm also starting to learn objective C (the
competitor to C++) so that I can utilize my Macintosh as a development
platform. The reason apple used objective C was because Mac OS X is
really Nextstep which
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:06:51 -0500
Alex Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is newer
and more advanced than C, will it replace C?
Unlikely. Old languages die hard - it's a
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:06:51 -0500
Alex Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is newer
and more advanced than C, will it replace C?
Unlikely. Old languages die
I've been programming in C for over 20 years.
I've gotten up to speed on C++ for work.
I like the expression in C you can shoot yourself in the foot,
in C++ you can blow off your leg.
C++ does have advantages -- but I haven't seen most C++
programmers use them -- instead they often obscure
On Nov 12, 2003, at 8:37 PM, Marty Leisner wrote:
BTW -- I've been doing object oriented stuff in C for years --
its harder, but its doable. You have a much simpler language
to deal with.
First learn how to write good programs in C.
Then see if C++ buys you anything extra.
If it doesn't, you
On 11/12/03 09:36 PM, Lucas Holt sat at the `puter and typed:
On Nov 12, 2003, at 8:37 PM, Marty Leisner wrote:
BTW -- I've been doing object oriented stuff in C for years --
its harder, but its doable. You have a much simpler language to
deal with.
First learn how to write
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 02:24 pm, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 11/12/03 09:36 PM, Lucas Holt sat at the `puter and typed:
On Nov 12, 2003, at 8:37 PM, Marty Leisner wrote:
BTW -- I've been doing object oriented stuff in C for years --
its harder, but its doable. You have a much simpler language
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:36:15PM -0500, Lucas Holt wrote:
On Nov 12, 2003, at 8:37 PM, Marty Leisner wrote:
BTW -- I've been doing object oriented stuff in C for years --
its harder, but its doable. You have a much simpler language
to deal with.
First learn how to write good
My take on computer science (which is an oxymoron) is this:
Researchers look at successful programmers and try to figure out
what they're doing.
In the 70s, it was structured programming.
In the late 80s it was object oriented.
You can manipulate the data with a struct -- put in function
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is newer and more advanced
than C, will it replace C? If so, should I learn C++ and forget C?
Alex
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is newer and
more advanced than C, will it replace C? If so, should I learn C++ and
forget C?
You can't learn C++ without learning C first. So I'd suggest you become
On Nov 11, 2003, at 9:06 PM, Alex Kelly wrote:
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is newer
and more advanced than C, will it replace C? If so, should I learn C++
and forget C?
Alex
You can't learn C++ without learning C first. So I'd suggest you
become
intimiately familiar with C, and then move on to the advanced concepts
and
features that C++ provides once you want/need to use them.
--
Matt Emmerton
Thats not entirely accurate. Western Michigan University only teaches
Alex Kelly wrote:
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is newer and more advanced than C, will it replace C? If so, should I learn C++ and forget C?
Alex
Again, it depends on WHAT you'd like to program.
On 11/11/03 09:26 PM, Matthew Emmerton sat at the `puter and typed:
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is
newer and more advanced than C, will it replace C? If so, should I
learn C++ and forget C?
C
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:02:53 -0500, Lucas Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can't learn C++ without learning C first. So I'd suggest you
become intimiately familiar with C, and then move on to the advanced
concepts and features that C++ provides once you want/need to use them.
--
Whoever mentioned the holy war may have been on to something. ;-)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/11/03 10:15 PM, Alex Kelly sat at the `puter and typed:
Whoever mentioned the holy war may have been on to something. ;-)
Yup. Been there, done that, got scars to prove it :)
--
Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :)
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 02:15 pm, Alex Kelly wrote:
Whoever mentioned the holy war may have been on to something. ;-)
Except they are all violently agreeing with one another...
I'd involke Godwin's Law if it wasn't for Quirk's Exception
--
Dr Paul van den Bergen
Centre for Advanced Internet
Thanks for all of the great suggestions to my previous question!
Yet, the responses have led me to another question. If C++ is newer
and
Bahh. Just jump straight into C# and you will avoid all those doubts.
just kidding ;)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All!!!
Anybody know some C/C++ maillist???
I think that here freebsd question only Do you know maillist for
C or C++ programming...???
--
Best regards, Denis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hi All!!!
Do you happed to know where I can subscribe to C/C++ maillists?
--
Best regards, Denis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
FreeBSD can compile C/C++ programs, if you have gcc or gcc-c++ installed respectively.
And you can link those programs if you have an appropriate linker installed
(binutils). Of course an assembler is also needed (which is installed along with
binutils).
--- On Fri 09/05, Denis [EMAIL
Hi,
I am looking for some sort of software which would allow me
to generate C/C++ (and preferably other languages, like Python
or PHP) references for a given project.
You should have a look at doxygen (ports/devel/doxygen,
http://www.doxygen.org). It generates nice documentation for C, C
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 06:18, Michal Pasternak wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for some sort of software which would allow me
to generate C/C++ (and preferably other languages, like Python
or PHP) references for a given project. Suppose I am browsing
FreeBSD kernel, notice, that a function uses
Hello,
I am looking for some sort of software which would allow me
to generate C/C++ (and preferably other languages, like Python
or PHP) references for a given project. Suppose I am browsing
FreeBSD kernel, notice, that a function uses ,,struct somestruct''
as it's parameter. I want to see, what
cscope works well for C, don't know about the other ones.
Ken
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Michal Pasternak wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for some sort of software which would allow me
to generate C/C++ (and preferably other languages, like Python
or PHP) references for a given project. Suppose I am
Michal Pasternak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am looking for some sort of software which would allow me
to generate C/C++ (and preferably other languages, like Python
or PHP) references for a given project. Suppose I am browsing
FreeBSD kernel, notice, that a function uses ,,struct somestruct
, there is an error in c.html. The Master Index link should
reference master_index.html, not mindxbdy.html. So far, this is the only
place I have encounted the incorrect link.
Not entirely certain if it was worth it, but I now have the Kdevelop
C/C++ reference installed on my dev system. :)
Regards, and thanks
I recently started playing around with Kdevelop 2.x on my server, and
found it much improved over the older releases. Getting into it, I decided
to download and compile the C/C++ reference documentation, and ran into a
snag. I'm not sure if it is because the configure script is having
problems
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:57:24PM -0400 or thereabouts, J. Seth Henry seemed to write:
I recently started playing around with Kdevelop 2.x on my server, and
found it much improved over the older releases. Getting into it, I decided
to download and compile the C/C++ reference documentation
, and
found it much improved over the older releases. Getting into it, I decided
to download and compile the C/C++ reference documentation, and ran into a
snag. I'm not sure if it is because the configure script is having
problems running on a FreeBSD box or what, but here is what I get
Could someone point me to a good mailinglist on (learning) C/C++?
Thanks!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Martin Moeller thusly...
Could someone point me to a good mailinglist on (learning) C/C++?
i don't know of any mailing lists, but comp.lang.c++.* are quite
good for newsgroups these days. if you keep your posts confined to
the subject (C++ the language
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Matthias Trevarthan wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:30:41 -0400
From: Matthias Trevarthan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD C/C++ Development Environment
Howdy.
I'm a Windows C/C++ DirectX developer turned FreeBSD systems administrator
PROTECTED]
Howdy.
I'm a Windows C/C++ DirectX developer turned FreeBSD systems administrator.
What is the standard development environment on FreeBSD systems for C/C++?
Does everyone really just use a Makefile, and editor like VIM, and a
command-line compiler? Or is that just
88 matches
Mail list logo
