On Tuesday 05 July 2005 12:24 pm, John Larson wrote:
> When I upgrade to perl 5.8.6 from 5.00 I get DBI not
> found in @INC array. what is the best way to upgrade
> the perl dbi. I tried portupgrade p-5* still have same
> problem help please
you have to upgrade all of the p5-\*
When I upgrade to perl 5.8.6 from 5.00 I get DBI not
found in @INC array. what is the best way to upgrade
the perl dbi. I tried portupgrade p-5* still have same
problem help please
John Larson
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you
Jack Raats wrote:
> I've a little question. After upgrading perl to 5.8.7. I'm getting an error
> of Apache. It says
>
> Syntax error on line 239 of /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache/libperl.so into server: Shared object
> &quo
I've a little question. After upgrading perl to 5.8.7. I'm getting an error of
Apache. It says
Syntax error on line 239 of /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache/libperl.so into server: Shared object
"libperl.so" not found, required by &qu
On 6/28/05, John Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently upgraded to perl 5.8.5.. I then issued the
> use.perl port command. I then issued the portupgrade
> 'p5-*' command as root. DBI cannot be found in the
> @INC array. what am I missing.
> John Larson
>
in the man page:
man perl-after-upgrade
[snip]
Also, with this script and with most well-written perl scripts,
modules, libraries, etc., you can do
perldoc perl-after-upgrade
to read the perl "pod" commentary that is literally embedded inside
the perl code (making the docume
man page:
man perl-after-upgrade
SYNOPSIS
perl-after-upgrade
perl-after-upgrade -f
perl-after-upgrade -v
--
I don't care what you think. This is not a stylishly insouciant stroll
out of the jungle, here. It's more like we've fallen out of our tree
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 13:08 -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> On 06/28/05 12:10 PM, Joe Altman sat at the `puter and typed:
> > Is anyone else seeing errorors like this:
> >
> > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libperl.so" not found, required by
> > &quo
On 06/28/05 01:24 PM, Joe Altman sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:08:58PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> >
> > Did you remember to update the ports that have Perl as a dependency with
> > the perl-after-upgrade script? You can find it in lang/perl5.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:08:58PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> Did you remember to update the ports that have Perl as a dependency with
> the perl-after-upgrade script? You can find it in lang/perl5.8/work/
> after the build (it is kept in lang/perl/files/). Make sure you read
On 06/28/05 12:10 PM, Joe Altman sat at the `puter and typed:
> Is anyone else seeing errorors like this:
>
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libperl.so" not found, required by "exim"
>
> after upgrading Perl when prompted by portversion?
>
> I
I recently upgraded to perl 5.8.5.. I then issued the
use.perl port command. I then issued the portupgrade
'p5-*' command as root. DBI cannot be found in the
@INC array. what am I missing.
John Larson
South Lak
Is anyone else seeing errorors like this:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libperl.so" not found, required by "exim"
after upgrading Perl when prompted by portversion?
I notice that ld-elf.so.1 has two versions:
55 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 153244 Jun 3 14:05 ld-el
databases/postgresql80-server/pkg-message-server
> for some sample settings.
>
> > Near as I can tell, this tells me I have at least 60 semaphores
> > systemwide, 60 per id, 3 in use, none of which are being used by root
> > (which is who I am running the test as). Shouldn&#
TED]> wrote:
I'm having a little trouble with my perl upgrade from 5.8.6 to 5.8.7.
-- cut --
ok 5
ok 6
semget: No space left on device
you need to make disc-space, one idea is to run portsclean -C or to make
some more space in /usr/home
That would be the obvious cause, but not so:
[.
]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm having a little trouble with my perl upgrade from 5.8.6 to 5.8.7.
> >> -- cut --
> >>> ok 5
> >>> ok 6
> >>> semget: No space left on device
> >>
> >> you need to make disc-space, one
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 06/26/05 10:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:17:06 -0400
Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having a little trouble with my perl upgrade from 5.8.6 to 5.8.7.
-- cut --
ok 5
ok 6
On 06/26/05 10:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:17:06 -0400
> Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm having a little trouble with my perl upgrade from 5.8.6 to 5.8.7.
> -- cut --
> > ok 5
> >
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:17:06 -0400
Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having a little trouble with my perl upgrade from 5.8.6 to 5.8.7.
-- cut --
> ok 5
> ok 6
> semget: No space left on device
you need to make disc-space, one idea is to run portsclean -C or
I'm having a little trouble with my perl upgrade from 5.8.6 to 5.8.7.
The build goes ok, but when I run 'make test' I get two failures.
Both appear to be in the IPC code. When running the failed tests by
hand, I get the following:
# ./perl ../ext/IPC/SysV/t/sem.t
1..10
semg
On 26 Jun Dominique Goncalves wrote:
> > And, if I type "sh perl-after-upgrade -f" I get the EXACT same
> > output as above, leading me to believe it is ignoring the -f option.
> >
> Use /usr/local/bin/perl-after-upgrade
To OP: are you sure you did a "rehash
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On 25 Jun John Webster wrote:
>
>>Read /usr/ports/UPDATING:
>>
>>20050624:
>> AFFECTS: users of lang/perl5.8
>> AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> lang/perl5.8 has been updated to 5.8.7. You should update
>> everyt
I have a question about the directories under /usr/local/lib/perl5
[system: freebsd-4.11-stable]
I installed the latest perl 5.8.7 and did everything mentioned in
/usr/ports/UPDATING (so all's well ;-))
Great script :: (perl-after-upgrade) !!
But looking into /usr/local/lib/perl5 I see a l
On 25 Jun John Webster wrote:
> Read /usr/ports/UPDATING:
>
> 20050624:
> AFFECTS: users of lang/perl5.8
> AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> lang/perl5.8 has been updated to 5.8.7. You should update
> everything depending on perl. The easiest way to do that is
>
Read /usr/ports/UPDATING:
20050624:
AFFECTS: users of lang/perl5.8
AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lang/perl5.8 has been updated to 5.8.7. You should update
everything depending on perl. The easiest way to do that is
to use perl-after-upgrade script supplied with lang/perl5.8.
Please see
Hello,
Trying to update my perl port from 5.8.6 to 5.8.7. The updating of perl
itself went fine, but all the dependent ports on it like swatch, php, etc.
previously referenced modules that were included in 5.8.6, now they're not
working. What extra step do i do?
Thanks.
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade net-mgmt/net-snmp-5.2.1_1 to
net-mgmt/net-snmp-5.2.1_2
I'm running 5.4p2 on this machine, which started life as 5.2.1-RELEASE & has
been tracking 5.3-RELEASE & now 5.4-RELEASE.
My perl version is 5.8.6
I update my ports tree every night and update my
--On Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:45:36 -0700 John Larson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I installed perl 5.8.5 when I did initial install of
freebsd 4.11 on my machine. when I do perl -v I get
perl 5.006. when I switch to the perl 5.8.5 it cannot
find DBI in the PM when I switch back it can
On Jun 7, 2005, at 3:45 PM, John Larson wrote:
I installed perl 5.8.5 when I did initial install of
freebsd 4.11 on my machine. when I do perl -v I get
perl 5.006. when I switch to the perl 5.8.5 it cannot
find DBI in the PM when I switch back it can.
Once you run "use.perl port" to
I installed perl 5.8.5 when I did initial install of
freebsd 4.11 on my machine. when I do perl -v I get
perl 5.006. when I switch to the perl 5.8.5 it cannot
find DBI in the PM when I switch back it can.
John Larson
__
Discover Yahoo!
Use
On 06 May Jim Campbell wrote:
> I installed lang/perl5.8 from my ports (...)
> (...) what am I doing wrong?
As said somewhere else: run use.perl
But better still: make a habit of reading the *end_screen* after a port
install. Very often useful information is diplayed there.
--
dick -- http://na
Hello everybody
we are trying to use a linux perl program called Mascot on FreeBSD. It is
statistical-bioinformatic software.
We use this program on Linux RedHat 7.3 (glibc 2.3.2), perl 5.8.6.
We copied the program and the libraries.
We tried installing the ports linux_base (glibc 2.1.3
Sometime yesterday, perl dumped core on my server. I've been trying to work out
what actually went wrong. I have two things that I know are running in perl:
1) ddclient, which keeps my ip address synced with dyndns.org and
2) spamassassin.
The only info that I can find is a mention i
Hello Gallery,
We have a full-time opportunity in Sunnyvale CA for a Senior Software
Engineer.
The ideal candidate must have strong Perl experience developing web
applications
Please send me your resume if you would like to be considered.
If you are not available feel free to refer me to some
Hi all.
Please help me to install the perl5.
he seems to miss some -lnsl librari.
There is the output of my try.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] perl5]$ make install clean
===> Extracting for perl-5.6.2_2
=> Checksum OK for perl-5.6.2.tar.gz.
=> Checksum OK for BSDPAN-5.6.2.tar.gz.
mkdir: /usr/p
It all started with a simple perl upgrade from 5.8.0 to 5.8.6.
Unfortunately, DB_File fails to build properly.
I am running FreeBSD 4.10 Stable #1
Here's the resu.llts of the make test
make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/local/bin/suidperl "-MExtUtils::Comman
t; >>MP on a tyan k7 board. Pretty much, the first port I am installing, I
> >>am getting errors. I need perl 5.8 installed and this is the end of the
> >>output.
> >>
> >>
> >> Making DynaLoader (static_pic)
> >>Makefile out-of-
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:17:35PM -0500, Bob Ababurko wrote:
Hello all-
I have just installed 5.3 on my new setup that is sporting two amd 2800+
MP on a tyan k7 board. Pretty much, the first port I am installing, I
am getting errors. I need perl 5.8 installed and this is
Dan Nelson wrote:
The following error occurs when a message has an attachment of more that
approx 35MB in size:
"Out of memory during "large" request for 67112960 bytes, total sbrk()
is 487512064 bytes at /usr/local/bin/imapsync line 790."
According to that output, perl was
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:17:35PM -0500, Bob Ababurko wrote:
> Hello all-
>
> I have just installed 5.3 on my new setup that is sporting two amd 2800+
> MP on a tyan k7 board. Pretty much, the first port I am installing, I
> am getting errors. I need perl 5.8 installed and thi
Hello all-
I have just installed 5.3 on my new setup that is sporting two amd 2800+
MP on a tyan k7 board. Pretty much, the first port I am installing, I
am getting errors. I need perl 5.8 installed and this is the end of the
output.
Making DynaLoader (static_pic)
Makefile out-of
;Out of memory during "large" request for 67112960 bytes, total sbrk()
> is 487512064 bytes at /usr/local/bin/imapsync line 790."
According to that output, perl was already using 464MB, and a malloc
request for 64MB failed, which is reasonable since the default hard
datasize lim
s 487512064 bytes at /usr/local/bin/imapsync line 790."
Running 5.3-STABLE a week or so old
Perl 5.8.6 from ports.
What bothers me especially is that this error will not occur when I run
the same command from a old RH Linux (7.2) box. Appriciate comme
Stefan Cars wrote:
Hi!
I'm upgrading perl 5.8 from the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine, the
problem is that alot of my installed modules doesn't work after the
update (just a minor update from 5.8.2 to 5.8.6), probably becuase the
@INC changed and did not include the mach directory of
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:34:30PM +0100, Stefan Cars wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm upgrading perl 5.8 from the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine, the
> problem is that alot of my installed modules doesn't work after the
> update (just a minor update from 5.8.2 to 5.8.6), pro
Hi!
I'm upgrading perl 5.8 from the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine, the
problem is that alot of my installed modules doesn't work after the
update (just a minor update from 5.8.2 to 5.8.6), probably becuase the
@INC changed and did not include the mach directory of 5.8.2. Is this
r
D'oh on me.. /sysutils/portdowngrade
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:20:15 -0500, Todd Suits
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to downgrade the perl port from 5.8.6 to 5.8.5 at least
> temporarily in order to install Plesk on a 5.3 system. I see the
> 5.8.5 files on the ftp.freebsd
I need to downgrade the perl port from 5.8.6 to 5.8.5 at least
temporarily in order to install Plesk on a 5.3 system. I see the
5.8.5 files on the ftp.freebsd.org/./distfiles server but I have
no idea how to go about doing a downgrade. I checked out the ported
applications link on the main
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:54:54PM -0500, Ean Kingston wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:55:52PM +0100, BSD todoo wrote:
> >
> >> How to deinstall a perl module (bsdpan-MailTools-1.64) that has been
> >> installed using CPAN ?
> >
> > # pk
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:54:54 -0500 (EST)"Ean Kingston"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|>Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:54:54 -0500 (EST)
|>From: "Ean Kingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>Subject: Re: Deinstalling perl module installed using CPAN
|>To: "Matthe
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:55:52PM +0100, BSD todoo wrote:
>
>> How to deinstall a perl module (bsdpan-MailTools-1.64) that has been
>> installed using CPAN ?
>
> # pkg_delete bsdpan-MailTools-1.64
If it was installed with CPAN, it is not in the FreeBSD pack
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:55:52PM +0100, BSD todoo wrote:
> How to deinstall a perl module (bsdpan-MailTools-1.64) that has been
> installed using CPAN ?
# pkg_delete bsdpan-MailTools-1.64
Easy.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
BSD todoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello again !
>
> I have all these version of perl installed on my system (FreeBSD 5.2.1)
> : 5.6.1 5.6.2 5.8.5 5.8.6
>
> I would like to get rid of the old versions and only keep 5.8.6 how do
> I
Hello again !
I have all these version of perl installed on my system (FreeBSD 5.2.1)
: 5.6.1 5.6.2 5.8.5 5.8.6
I would like to get rid of the old versions and only keep 5.8.6 how do
I have to do that ??
The reason why I would like to do that is that when I
Hi all,
How to deinstall a perl module (bsdpan-MailTools-1.64) that has been
installed using CPAN ?
I would like to deinstall that module manually and then reinstall It
from the port tree.
The reason why is that everytime I try ton deinstall a port I have
these nasty messages :
ns2
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To:
> > > Cc: "Paul Schmehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 3:42 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Updated perl - broke stuff
> > >
> > > > I stopped using portupgrade because it only
AIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 3:42 PM
> > Subject: Re: Updated perl - broke stuff
> >
> > > I stopped using portupgrade because it only upgrades ports that are
> > > out-of date. It then modifies the installed software database to
>
On 14 Feb Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:24:07PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> > Meaning I don't run this update script when updating perl from say
> > "5.8.5" to "5.8.6" ?
>
> No, that what I meant by "when updating fr
t; > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? It contains a suggestion for how to
> > > >update the Perl ports which might have helped...
> > > >
> > > Well, no. Why on earth would I do *that*? ;-)
> > >
>
On 13 Feb Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:35:06PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> > --On Sunday, February 13, 2005 5:18 PM -0500 Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? It contains
On Monday 14 February 2005 01:09 am, you wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:37:28AM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > portupgrade -rf forces the rebuild of the port and ALL of its
> > dependencies, and it builds them in the wrong order, it is nothing
> > like portmanager.
> >
> > example:
> >
>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:37:28AM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> portupgrade -rf forces the rebuild of the port and ALL of its
> dependencies, and it builds them in the wrong order, it is nothing
> like portmanager.
>
> example:
>
> if the following are installed:
>
> masterPort-0.0
> de
On Sunday 13 February 2005 06:34 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:15:18PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > Pkgdb -F is what screws up the installed ports registry. Here is an
> > example of what happens:
> >
> > 1. port-A needs dependency port-B installed
> > 2. port-B is in
On Sunday 13 February 2005 06:37 pm, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Sunday, February 13, 2005 6:15 PM -0800 "Michael C. Shultz"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pkgdb -F is what screws up the installed ports registry. Here is an
> > example of what happens:
> >
> > 1. port-A needs dependency port-B i
On Sunday 13 February 2005 06:34 pm, you wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:15:18PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > Pkgdb -F is what screws up the installed ports registry. Here is an
> > example of what happens:
> >
> > 1. port-A needs dependency port-B installed
> > 2. port-B is installed
>
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:35:06PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Sunday, February 13, 2005 5:18 PM -0500 Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? It contains a suggestion for how to
> >update the Perl ports which might
--On Sunday, February 13, 2005 6:15 PM -0800 "Michael C. Shultz"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pkgdb -F is what screws up the installed ports registry. Here is an
example of what happens:
1. port-A needs dependency port-B installed
2. port-B is installed
3. port-A is installed and marks its registry
--On Sunday, February 13, 2005 5:18 PM -0500 Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? It contains a suggestion for how to
update the Perl ports which might have helped...
Well, no. Why on earth would I do *that*? ;-)
(Thanks for the tip. I ran it.) I
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:15:18PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> Pkgdb -F is what screws up the installed ports registry. Here is an
> example of what happens:
>
> 1. port-A needs dependency port-B installed
> 2. port-B is installed
> 3. port-A is installed and marks its registry as being de
On Sunday 13 February 2005 02:02 pm, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ean Kingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Cc: "Paul Schmehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 3:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Updated pe
Piggy-backing on the Subject: line
I recently upgraded perl per the entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Afterwards, gtk-gnutalla is broken. Run from the command line,
I get a whole slew of messages like this:
05/02/13 17:19:58 (WARNING): hostiles.txt, line 243: rejected
Paul Schmehl wrote:
I maintain a small hobby website on a volunteer basis. (I do all the
technical stuff - server maintenance, etc.) I ran portupgrade today,
and there was an update to perl. (I'm using the ports perl.) It broke
the webserver. I had to deinstall and reinstall www/p5-l
- Original Message -
From: "Ean Kingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "Paul Schmehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: Updated perl - broke stuff
I stopped using portupgrade because it only upgrades ports that are o
Paul Schmehl wrote:
I maintain a small hobby website on a volunteer basis. (I do all the
technical stuff - server maintenance, etc.) I ran portupgrade today,
and there was an update to perl. (I'm using the ports perl.) It broke
the webserver. I had to deinstall and reinstall www/p5-l
On February 13, 2005 04:37 pm, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I maintain a small hobby website on a volunteer basis. (I do all the
> technical stuff - server maintenance, etc.) I ran portupgrade today, and
> there was an update to perl. (I'm using the ports perl.) It broke the
> web
I maintain a small hobby website on a volunteer basis. (I do all the
technical stuff - server maintenance, etc.) I ran portupgrade today, and
there was an update to perl. (I'm using the ports perl.) It broke the
webserver. I had to deinstall and reinstall www/p5-libwww, www/mod_per
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:07:59 - , in local.freebsd.questions you
wrote:
>I have a 4.7-based system I use as a mail gateway. Yesterday I
>did a portupgrade of perl from 5.6.1 to 5.6.2. Today I find that
>I have no incoming mail, due to mimedefang no longer functioning:
Bang my head
Jim Hatfield wrote:
I have a 4.7-based system I use as a mail gateway. Yesterday I
did a portupgrade of perl from 5.6.1 to 5.6.2. Today I find that
I have no incoming mail, due to mimedefang no longer functioning:
But pkg_info shows p5-MIME-Base64 as present!
And it is, but not on any of the
I have a 4.7-based system I use as a mail gateway. Yesterday I
did a portupgrade of perl from 5.6.1 to 5.6.2. Today I find that
I have no incoming mail, due to mimedefang no longer functioning:
>Feb 9 09:56:39 highland mimedefang-multiplexor[91186]: Slave 0 stderr: Can't
>locate MIM
Thanks it seems to do the trick.
olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:13:30 +0700 (ICT)
Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you aware of any magical formula that would list the Perl modules
> installed in a configuration?
And an alternative approach:
http://tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:13:30 +0700 (ICT)
Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you aware of any magical formula that would list the Perl modules
> installed in a configuration?
Your question interested me so I took it upon myself to Google for it. :p
This should do it f
Hi,
Are you aware of any magical formula that would list the Perl modules
installed in a configuration?
I have to set-up a new machine and would need to re-install (newer
version of) all themodules used on the old machine.
Olivier
___
freebsd
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:02:08PM -0500, dave wrote:
> Hello,
> I just updated ports after being away for two weeks. The update process
> itself went fine, my problem came when i ran the command to update
> perl-dependent ports as suggested in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I got a bunch
On Monday 07 February 2005 09:02 am, "dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
> I just updated ports after being away for two weeks. The update
> process itself went fine, my problem came when i ran the command to
> update perl-dependent ports as suggested in /u
Hello,
I just updated ports after being away for two weeks. The update process
itself went fine, my problem came when i ran the command to update
perl-dependent ports as suggested in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I got a bunch of
failed updates, php4-extensions, and any of my p5* ports, apache2
Can all future replys on this subject please exclude me in the reply please :)
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
http://www.shinji.nq.nu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 10:13:45PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Feb 04), Loren M. Lang said:
> > Actually, I think you should work on sh first, it's a much bigger
> > security hazard than perl. If you've ever written much sh, you'd
> > reali
In the last episode (Feb 04), Loren M. Lang said:
> Actually, I think you should work on sh first, it's a much bigger
> security hazard than perl. If you've ever written much sh, you'd
> realize with it's much loser syntax, it's easy to get into trouble.
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:41:56PM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> ps who is the imake developer ?
>
> Believe me i am going to mail every developer where perl comes in
> between me and the application :P
Actually, I think you should work on sh first, it's a much bigger
security
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:06:57AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Hello,
>
> I have to do thise things:
>
> A) if Perl is installed from pkg_add and not the ports, uninstall it.
> pkg_delete -f perl5.8
> B) add ENABLE_SUIDPERL=true to /etc/make.conf
> C) cd to /us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have to do thise things:
A) if Perl is installed from pkg_add and not the ports, uninstall it.
pkg_delete -f perl5.8
B) add ENABLE_SUIDPERL=true to /etc/make.conf
C) cd to /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
D) make -DENABLE_SUIDPERL"TRUE" install clean
E) re-insta
Hello,
I have to do thise things:
A) if Perl is installed from pkg_add and not the ports, uninstall it.
pkg_delete -f perl5.8
B) add ENABLE_SUIDPERL=true to /etc/make.conf
C) cd to /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
D) make -DENABLE_SUIDPERL"TRUE" install clean
E) re-install all the perl module
ok ok me stop asking questions about the wrench lying in my living
room next to my television. I will just put some flowers on top of it
:P
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsub
would be
> pointless.
>
> We've distinguished the difference between building your own ports
> and bringing in the tools required to build those ports. You now
> have your answers.
OK Gert,
I agree with Adam. I think it's time for you to make a decision. You
either e
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 06:31:32PM +0100, Gert Cuykens said:
> >If you compile from the ports then the television factory is also your
> >living room.
>
> True, lets talk about the factory then
>
> The machinery would be /usr/src
> The resources would be /usr/ports
>
> Do you agree a wrench is n
n't make sense go to someplace where they get a lot of snow
> and look at how plows go onto trucks.
>
> Perl is not a wrench. Perl is an attachment framework that makes it
> much easier to attach extra parts. If you want a part that needs that
> framework you must eithe
Gert Cuykens wrote:
True, lets talk about the factory then
The machinery would be /usr/src
The resources would be /usr/ports
Do you agree a wrench is not a resource ?
I think your analogies go astray because you don't fully understand
the wide variety of uses Perl has. It used in many diff
>That's not what you're saying. you're asking the people who build your
>car not to use a wrench but their bare hands because you have something
>against wrenches for some reason.
i have nothing against a wrenches
>If you compile from the ports then the television factory is also your
>living roo
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:59:54PM +0100, Gert Cuykens said:
>
> I am not a developer so i can not think for them i can only ask
> questions. I would not even ask them if the application itself would
> use it. Then i would accept it as part of a furniture.
>
> PS if you buy a new television do yo
801 - 900 of 1505 matches
Mail list logo
