I have some scripts that do fairly crude IPv4/6 validation testing. It is
generally
assumed that the input is coming from someone who knows what they are doing,
but even the
best of us have fat fingers sometimes :) Having standardized routines for
something like
this is great!
Thanks,
-Markham
On Aug 6, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:50:37 +, Teske, Devin wrote:
>> And yes... to clarify... the port is a mirror of what's in 9.x base.
>> (however, see my recent notes in a separate reply; TL;DR: port is
>> 9.x only; proceed only if you know you don't care
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:50:37 +, Teske, Devin wrote:
> And yes... to clarify... the port is a mirror of what's in 9.x base.
> (however, see my recent notes in a separate reply; TL;DR: port is
> 9.x only; proceed only if you know you don't care about the dialog(1)
> aspects of the library code).
On Aug 6, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:20:05 -0600, markham breitbach wrote:
>> On 13-08-03 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
>>> Actually, there's /usr/share/bsdconfig/media/tcpip.subr
>>>
>>>
>> I don't seem to have that (FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE).
>> Where would I get
On Aug 6, 2013, at 9:20 AM, markham breitbach wrote:
> On 13-08-03 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
>> Actually, there's /usr/share/bsdconfig/media/tcpip.subr
>>
>>
> I don't seem to have that (FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE). Where would I get that
> from?
>
>
It's in up-coming 9.2-R (and present 9.2-
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:20:05 -0600, markham breitbach wrote:
> On 13-08-03 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
> > Actually, there's /usr/share/bsdconfig/media/tcpip.subr
> >
> >
> I don't seem to have that (FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE).
> Where would I get that from?
Maybe from sysutils/bsdconfig in the ports
On 13-08-03 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
> Actually, there's /usr/share/bsdconfig/media/tcpip.subr
>
>
I don't seem to have that (FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE). Where would I get that from?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
On Aug 3, 2013, at 5:04 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Fbsd8 writes:
>
>> I have a .sh script that I need to determine if the entered IP
>> address is IPv4 or IPv6.
>>
>> Is there some .sh command that does this?
>
> Not that I know of.
>
On Aug 3, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> I have a .sh script that I need to determine if the entered IP address
> is IPv4 or IPv6.
>
> Is there some .sh command that does this?
>
In RELENG_9, soon to be released 9.2-R:
=== FILE: wis ===
#!/bin/sh
DEVICE_SELF_SCAN_AL
Fbsd8 writes:
> I have a .sh script that I need to determine if the entered IP
> address is IPv4 or IPv6.
>
> Is there some .sh command that does this?
Not that I know of.
But ... how hard can it be to figure out whether it
I have a .sh script that I need to determine if the entered IP address
is IPv4 or IPv6.
Is there some .sh command that does this?
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Frank Bonnet esiee.fr> writes:
>
> Hello
>
> Do I have to reboot a server after unvalidating IPv6 in /etc/rc.conf ?
>
> I seems to use "/etc/rc.d/netif restart" is not suffisant
Use 'netstat' to see what service(s) lis
Hello
Do I have to reboot a server after unvalidating IPv6 in /etc/rc.conf ?
I seems to use "/etc/rc.d/netif restart" is not suffisant
Thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
Dear Freebsder：
I made a Ipv6 ready logo test to Freebsd9.0,but nd.p2 169-175 items
were failed .
These failed items are related to Redirection. I find the lack of
neighbor solicitation make these items fail .
Maybe the existence of neighbor cache of the tester Freebsd cause
Hi, everyone:
I am trying to set up a EtherIP tunnel device to tunnel Ethernet traffic
over IPv6 using EtherIP protocol. I have Freebsd 8.3 runs on a i386
machine, and ipv6 enabled. I tried the commands below but no one works...
ifconfig gif0 create
ifconfig gif0 tunnel 2001:::1 2001:::10
#x27;m attaching the
code for the client and as well one for a server creating LISTEN on IPv6
and IPv4 at the same time and handling the connections on both ports;
HIH
matthias
/* IPv6 client code using getaddrinfo */
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#includ
> From: Doug Hardie
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:21:38 -0700
> Subject: Re: IPv6 && getaddrinfo(3C)
>
> On 12 July 2012, at 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can'
On 12 July 2012, at 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
> getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as stated in its man page:
> accept an IPv6 and IPv4 IP addr, it only works with the I
Hello,
I'm playing around with IPv6 code on a FreeBSD 9 system and can't get
getaddrinfo(3C) to do what it should do as stated in its man page:
accept an IPv6 and IPv4 IP addr, it only works with the IPv6 form:
$ ./a.out ::1
host: ::1
read: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.6p1 FreeBSD-2010
Hello questions,
I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong here.
Trying to get a static IPv6 on a server at boot time from rc.conf, and
that fails.
Notice I haven't set ipv6_network_interfaces , so it defaults to "auto".
=
ipv6_enable="YES"
ipv6_d
On 08/06/2012 06:59, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Probably. The good news is that once you've got it running the IPv6
support in FreeBSD is rock solid and works like a charm.
It turns out that PF was being too helpful and trying to NAT for both
IPv4 and IPv6 - adding 'inet' to the
On 07/06/2012 23:56, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Please provide the output from these two commands:
ifconfig -a
netstat -nr
on both the router and on an 'inside' machine. (identifying which is which:)
There is also a question of 'where' the /48 comes from -- and how
traffic to those addresses
Make sure you are only advertising a /64 addr prefixlen in rtadvd.conf,
and not the entire /48.
On 6/7/2012 4:36 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
which I use to giv
On 07/06/2012 23:36, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
> network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
> which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
> (tun0 is assigned the addre
> From: Bruce Cran
>
> I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
> network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
> which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
> (tun0 is assigned the address via pp
I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
(tun0 is assigned the address via ppp.linkup).
I've added all the IPv6 settings
from any to me 33433-33499
230 allow tcp from any to 82.197.184.219 22,80,443 setup
65000 deny log ip from any to me
65001 deny log ip from any to me6
What I am wondering is, am I blocking all ipv6 traffic by not explicitly
allowing ipv6 in (for the established rule 100, icmp rule 110, and the
On 23. May 2012, at 08:22 , Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
> Folks,
> Can somebody please explain me why "tcp checsum" calculation is mandated in
> the freebsd network stack (tcp_input--->in6_cksum) albeit the card supports
> it?
>
> Probably Steve is the right person who can answer this.
Just for publi
ote:
> Ok. I found the reason for the throughput drop in case of IPv6.
> Reason is that the "tcp check sum" calculation is mandated in case of IPv6
> irrespective of whether the card is doing it or not (checksum offload). Is
> there a reason why freebsd is doing it that way?
&g
Ok. I found the reason for the throughput drop in case of IPv6.
Reason is that the "tcp check sum" calculation is mandated in case of IPv6
irrespective of whether the card is doing it or not (checksum offload). Is
there a reason why freebsd is doing it that way?
/Venkat
On Tue, May 2
rmance drop in case of IPv6 on
> the "rx" side.
> While I'm able to hit line rate ~9.5 Gbps on a 10gb NIC for IPv4..I could
> only get ~6 Gbps on the "rx" front for IPv6...However "tx" for IPv6 is on
> par with IPv4 hitting almost line rates.
>
>
Thanks for the response.
I observed that there is a significant performance drop in case of IPv6 on
the "rx" side.
While I'm able to hit line rate ~9.5 Gbps on a 10gb NIC for IPv4..I could
only get ~6 Gbps on the "rx" front for IPv6...However "tx" for IPv6 is o
On 22. May 2012, at 17:04 , Jack Vogel wrote:
> Oh, that's right, distracted with other projects and I forgot, now we just
> need
> to have an LRO that works with forwarding eh :)
That's a 6 line bainaid commit afterwards, basically returning form the LRO
queuing
function in case forwarding is
Oh, that's right, distracted with other projects and I forgot, now we just
need
to have an LRO that works with forwarding eh :)
You ROCK bz :)
Jack
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> On 22. May 2012, at 16:50 , Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> > The LRO code as it stands right n
On 22. May 2012, at 16:50 , Jack Vogel wrote:
> The LRO code as it stands right now is IPV4 specific, it would be nice to
> extend it, one of
> many improvements that may get done at some point.
I am about to commit it to HEAD. Bear another few days with me; I know
I am running late but committ
as LRO
> support for IPv6?
> I'm using 9.0-RELEASE and I see that tcp_lro_rx is failing.
>
> Please confirm.
>
> /Venkat
> ___
> freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To u
Folks,
Could somebody please tell about the base Freebsd version which has LRO
support for IPv6?
I'm using 9.0-RELEASE and I see that tcp_lro_rx is failing.
Please confirm.
/Venkat
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
Folks,
This question is related to the hash calculation done as part of selecting
the transmit queue for IPv6 traffic.
I observed that no matter how many queues you use in the driver, the tx
traffic is always coming on queue 0.
Did anybody else observed this behaviour? and is that how it is in
On 03/04/2012 18:40, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After installing a new machine under FreeBSD9 I discovered that the
> IPv6-configuration I had in place with FreeBSD8 does no longer work.
>
> Here's what I've got in /etc/rc.conf:
> ipv6_enable="YES"
&g
Hi,
After installing a new machine under FreeBSD9 I discovered that the
IPv6-configuration I had in place with FreeBSD8 does no longer work.
Here's what I've got in /etc/rc.conf:
ipv6_enable="YES"
ipv6_ifconfig_em0="2001:76c:2218:2009::11/64"
ipv6_defaultroute
Oh also if you would like to relay smtp mail give me a shout right now it's
restricted to the IPv6 64 blog that the machine manages - heck if you want an
IPv6 address I could give you one and it SHOULD work anywhere you are connected
as long as your IP can deal with IPv6
RB
On Jan 27,
IPv6 fully operational - named/bind9 resolving all dns and works fine for IPv6
only hosts…. ipcloud.ws is IPv6 only to the external internet and works fine
via www, ssh, smtp mail, etc as long as you are on another IPv6 capable host.
Pretty nice. I am glad you brought this up. If you need a
On 2012.01.26 16:03, Robert Boyer wrote:
I can probably arrange for a tunneled v6 address - should be the same thing at
the end of the day…. how much time/mem you need?
Thanks Robert,
As far as time/mem, I'm not all too sure as it has been some time since
I've run anything virtualized, so an
> things.
>
> I'm wondering if there is anyone out there who can let me temporarily borrow
> a CLI-only clean install FBSD virtual machine with a publicly facing IPv4 and
> native IPv6 address. It will be extremely low bandwidth (almost none at all)
> for testing som
Hi all!
I've been away for some time, but I'm now getting back into the full
swing of things.
I'm wondering if there is anyone out there who can let me temporarily
borrow a CLI-only clean install FBSD virtual machine with a publicly
facing IPv4 and native IPv6 address. It wi
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that
you must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with the new lines because according to the manpage
ipv6_e
On 15/01/2012 21:41, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that
you must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with th
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that you
must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with the new lines because according to the ma
On 14/01/2012 18:07, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES". But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, the wise Yuri Pankov wrote:
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES". But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 06:07:01PM +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and all
> worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
> ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES". But now there are still some
Hi,
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES". But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6 doesn't seem to work correctly:
.
/ntp.conf contains just a single line:
server ntp.plus.net maxpoll 9
The boot messages appear to be just warnings because ntpd is working fine
over
IPV4 but I feel that I should try to fix this in case it leads to problems
later. I certainly don'
Hello list,
I enabled ipv6 in a server running 7.4-RELEASE with amd64 generic
kernel, and bge. I issued a static ipv6 address with prefix lenght 120
(according to my network administrator) and ipv6 default route in
rc.conf, and issued '/etc/rc.d/network_ipv6 start'.
ifconfig bge0:
b
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Robert Simmons wrote:
I have begun receiving ipv6 spam from this mailing list, and I was
> wondering how to determine who the owner of a particular ipv6 address
> is.
A whois may tell you who the block has been given too (ISP wise) ... that
may start you
I have begun receiving ipv6 spam from this mailing list, and I was
wondering how to determine who the owner of a particular ipv6 address
is.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On 3.2.2011 17:53, Thomas Sandford wrote:
On 01/02/2011 07:29, pepe wrote:
I have 2001:14b8:10:402::/64 ipv6 from my isp and I cant get it working.
Ifconfig should be ok:
backup# ifconfig rl0 inet6
rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 prefixlen 64
Looks a
On 01/02/2011 07:29, pepe wrote:
I have 2001:14b8:10:402::/64 ipv6 from my isp and I cant get it working.
Ifconfig should be ok:
backup# ifconfig rl0 inet6
rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 prefixlen 64
Looks a bit odd - I would expect
I have 2001:14b8:10:402::/64 ipv6 from my isp and I cant get it working.
Ifconfig should be ok:
backup# ifconfig rl0 inet6
rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 prefixlen 64
default gateway is set to 2001:14b8:10:402:1::1. When I try to
L.S.,
every once in a while I see the following messages filling the logs on my
FreeBSD installations:
IPFW2: IPV6 - Unknown Extension Header(128), ext_hd=0
I am somewhat curious why this message occurs. Did I configure something wrong,
Is there an implementation defect in an existing ipv6
Not specifically related but I just worked around an issue with a Dell
laptop with the xl0 interface which has problems with 8.1.
I was experimenting with a IPv6 setup and used an old PC (big and
noisy) with the smallest install of 8.1. It worked fine as the tunnel
server and ipv6 gateway
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
> Carl Johnson writes:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> Now if I could just figure out why gnus doesn't work right under emacs
>> I could finish migrating from Linux to FreeBSD.
>
> I use same .gnus in both GNU/Linux and FreeBSD and keep the mailboxen on the
> $HOME of b
Carl Johnson writes:
[...]
> Now if I could just figure out why gnus doesn't work right under emacs
> I could finish migrating from Linux to FreeBSD.
I use same .gnus in both GNU/Linux and FreeBSD and keep the mailboxen on the
$HOME of both boxen sync-ed with each other, and works great for me.
Carl Johnson writes:
> I have running versions of 7.3 and 8.0, so I tried experimenting with
> 8.1 in VirtualBox, but I ran into a couple of problems. I have an 8.0
> system that is running a IPv6 tunnel to sixxs.net, and it is running
> rtadvd to act as the gatway for my network.
Vincent Hoffman writes:
> On 30/07/2010 18:48, Carl Johnson wrote:
>> I have running versions of 7.3 and 8.0, so I tried experimenting with
>> 8.1 in VirtualBox, but I ran into a couple of problems. I have an 8.0
>> system that is running a IPv6 tunnel to sixxs.net, and it
On 30/07/2010 18:48, Carl Johnson wrote:
> I have running versions of 7.3 and 8.0, so I tried experimenting with
> 8.1 in VirtualBox, but I ran into a couple of problems. I have an 8.0
> system that is running a IPv6 tunnel to sixxs.net, and it is running
> rtadvd to act as the g
I have running versions of 7.3 and 8.0, so I tried experimenting with
8.1 in VirtualBox, but I ran into a couple of problems. I have an 8.0
system that is running a IPv6 tunnel to sixxs.net, and it is running
rtadvd to act as the gatway for my network. On the 8.1 system I
enabled IPv6 in rc.conf
Hi,
currently I'm monitoring the network traffic with ng_netflow and
nfdump/nfsen is used to collect, display and analyze the network traffic.
I'm reviewing the tools to monitor ipv6. ng_netflow doesn't support ipv6
(is there a schedule to implement the needed protocol version
entries 20090926 and 20091202. The system runs ipv6, but
> external connectivity is though a v6-over-v4 tunnel (net/gateway6).
> rc.conf currently has:
>
> huff@>>grep v6 /etc/rc.conf
> ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" # Set to YES if this host will be a gateway.
>
I am updating a system:
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3: Tue Sep 15 18:49:58 EDT 2009 amd64
and failing to understand the (practical) consequences of
UPDATING entries 20090926 and 20091202. The system runs ipv6, but
external connectivity is though a v6-over-v4 tunnel (net/gateway6
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Brian Conway wrote:
I recently set up an HE.net tunnel using the following guides:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-ipv6.html
http://www.freebsddiary.org/ipv6.php
FreeBSD 7.2-p5 is used for the router and the host, and it works beautifully,
except that the
I recently set up an HE.net tunnel using the following guides:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-ipv6.html
http://www.freebsddiary.org/ipv6.php
FreeBSD 7.2-p5 is used for the router and the host, and it works
beautifully, except that the host will only pick up the IPv6 prefix on
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
> On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
>> How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
>>
>> This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
>> 2003:16c8:dc1e::2
>&
On 1/25/2010 12:15 PM, Peter Ankerstål wrote:
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf:
ipv6_static_routes="2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2"
How do I set a static ipv6 route in rc.conf?
This command works: route add -inet6 -net 2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64
2003:16c8:dc1e::2
and I use this in rc.conf:
ipv6_static_routes="2003:16c8:dc1e:2:: -prefixlen 64 2003:16c8:dc1e::2"
but it does not set the correct routes
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:56:31AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
>
> >This caught my interest this morning so I set up a commented-out trial in
> >/etc/rc.d for my ipv6 entry; the one I had in my database /etc/namedb/*
> >files
> >ble
> I'm having problems with the /etc/rc.conf setup of a ipv6 tunnel on my
> FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p6
> It`s a particular issue on the ipv6_defaultrouter config, it jost does not
> work...
> Upon network and routing restart ipv6 is enabled the gif interface are given
> ip&#
Gary Kline wrote:
This caught my interest this morning so I set up a commented-out trial in
/etc/rc.d for my ipv6 entry; the one I had in my database /etc/namedb/* files
blew my connection sky-high recently.
Does this seem plausible:
#
## ipv6 config
#
# ipv6_enable=&quo
gt; The above works.
>
> > or, even better, like this:
> >
> > ipv4_addrs_re0="208.70.104.210/26 208.70.104.211/26"
> > ipv6_addrs_re0="2607:f118::b6/64 2607:f118::b7/64"
>
> Unfortunately, that one does not. I do not get any IPv6 addresses
>
Some point out rc.local as a fix, i find it ok to but it has some
ups'n'downs indeed in a reboot situation rc.local having the route add
command would be ok but in a short network restart it wouldn't count (as i
particularly value my uptime)... the ipv6 defaultroute it's not a
55.255.255"
> ipv6_ifconfig_re0="2607:f118::b6 prefixlen 64"
> ipv6_ifconfig_re0_alias0="2607:f118::b7 prefixlen 64"
The above works.
> or, even better, like this:
>
> ipv4_addrs_re0="208.70.104.210/26 208.70.104.211/26"
> ipv6_addrs_re0="2
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
>> Hmmm. This config does not work:
>>
>> ifconfig_re0="inet 208.70.104.210 netmask 255.255.255.192"
>> ifconfig_re0_alias0="inet 208.70.104.211 netmask 255.255.255.255"
>> ifconfig_re0_alias1="inet6 2607:f118::b6 prefixlen 64"
>> ifconfig_re0_alias2
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hmmm. This config does not work:
ifconfig_re0="inet 208.70.104.210 netmask 255.255.255.192"
ifconfig_re0_alias0="inet 208.70.104.211 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_re0_alias1="inet6 2607:f118::b6 prefixlen 64"
ifconfig_re0_alias2="inet6 2607:f118::b7 prefixlen 64"
Yep
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Funny. My IPv6 config works like a charm, on both 7.2-STABLE and
> 8.0-STABLE. Related config settings look like this:
>
> gif_interfaces="gif0"
> gifconfig_gif0="81.187.76.162 81.187.81.6"
>
> i
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Bogdan Webb wrote:
I'm having problems with the /etc/rc.conf setup of a ipv6 tunnel on my
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p6
It`s a particular issue on the ipv6_defaultrouter config, it jost does not
work...
Upon network and routing restart ipv6 is enabled the gif interface are
Bogdan Webb wrote:
> I'm having problems with the /etc/rc.conf setup of a ipv6 tunnel on my
> FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p6
> It`s a particular issue on the ipv6_defaultrouter config, it jost does not
> work...
> Upon network and routing restart ipv6 is enabled the gif interface
I'm having problems with the /etc/rc.conf setup of a ipv6 tunnel on my
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p6
It`s a particular issue on the ipv6_defaultrouter config, it jost does not
work...
Upon network and routing restart ipv6 is enabled the gif interface are given
ip's and everything but the def
Hi all,
I have 7.2-RELEASE and a bridge between ath0 and sis0 everything works
fine except ipv6 including router advertisements.
There is no filtering, just a L2 bridge without any address. rtadv
comes from lan/sis. What could be missing?
bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
1500
$witch writes:
> have done a "best effort" to avoid useless question, am posting after
> various faq-research and tests.
>
> having an IPv6-ONLY (FreeBSD 7.0) host that needs to perform a "portsnap
> fetch" there is NO LIST of portsnap-IPv6-capable servers.
Hi,
have done a "best effort" to avoid useless question, am posting after
various faq-research and tests.
having an IPv6-ONLY (FreeBSD 7.0) host that needs to perform a "portsnap
fetch" there is NO LIST of portsnap-IPv6-capable servers.
maybe they don't exists or i am
On 21 August 2009, at 11:33, David Horn wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have found what to me seems like a bug with ICMPv6 handling in
IPv6.
However, before submitting a PR I wanted to check to be sure that
its not a
misunderstanding on my part.
The network
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I have found what to me seems like a bug with ICMPv6 handling in IPv6.
> However, before submitting a PR I wanted to check to be sure that its not a
> misunderstanding on my part.
>
> The network setup. A host (A) connected
I have found what to me seems like a bug with ICMPv6 handling in
IPv6. However, before submitting a PR I wanted to check to be sure
that its not a misunderstanding on my part.
The network setup. A host (A) connected to a router (B) connected to
another host (C) on a separate network
Reinhard Haller wrote:
I'm missing ipv6 traffic (all ssh-traffic is going over ipv6) in the
filtered netflow output.
I've checked the netflow data with tcpdump/wireshark, there is no ipv6
netflow monitored.
ng_netflow implements netflow version 5, which doesn't
suppo
Hi,
I'm monitoring the network traffic with ng_netflow and
collecting/displaying it with nfsen.
I'm missing ipv6 traffic (all ssh-traffic is going over ipv6) in the
filtered netflow output.
I've checked the netflow data with tcpdump/wireshark, there is no ipv6
netflow monito
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 17:56 +1000, Brett Wiggins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking to rent a FreeBSD server that has access to an IPv6
> address. I have previously rented a FreeBSD server from theplanet.com
> but they only offer IPv4 and I would like my server to be on the IPv6
Hi,
I am looking to rent a FreeBSD server that has access to an IPv6
address. I have previously rented a FreeBSD server from theplanet.com
but they only offer IPv4 and I would like my server to be on the IPv6
network. Does anyone have any knowledge of companies that offer this?
thanks,
Brett
Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Hello:
I'm having reachability problems with a CARP interface set up on two 7.1
boxes with an uplink to Cisco routers. However, the inside CARP address
on the same set of PF boxes are reachable with no trouble. Here's the
config.
Cisco Cisco
H
Hello:
I'm having reachability problems with a CARP interface set up on two 7.1
boxes with an uplink to Cisco routers. However, the inside CARP address
on the same set of PF boxes are reachable with no trouble. Here's the
config.
Cisco Cisco
HSRP Gateway
|
CA
Aurélien Ansel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sorry in advance for my bad english.
>
> I think i have a problem with the MIB of IPv6.
>
> I have installed the last port of net-snmp.
>
> Can someone give the result of this request, it must be send to a
> computer with
1 - 100 of 444 matches
Mail list logo
