On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:09:42 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2007 18:27:26 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
netsed's output is (part ) :
---
Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
[EMAIL
Hello everyone, I need your help / insight here :)
My setup, 2 VMs, XP (WinXP) and BSD (FreeBSD 6.2)
[XP ,172.16.82.81 ] --- [172.16.82.81,em1 BSD A.B.C.D,em0] --- The Interweb
[Other_servers_galore]
A.B.C.D is a public IP.
[Other_servers_galore] represents all and any servers XP
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:27:29PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any - 127.0.0.1 port 10101
netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
The traffic from XP gets redirected just fine to netsed, which replaces the
bytes just fine. BUT the changed packets (the
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:13:12 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're looking for tagging, for example:
rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any tag NETSED - 127.0.0.1
port
10101
Then you need to figure out how they come back and pass them through, for
example:
pass
On Friday 31 August 2007 12:27:29 Norberto Meijome wrote:
1) pf.conf has :
ext_if=em0
int_if=em1
nat on $ext_if from $internal_net to any - ($ext_if)
rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any - 127.0.0.1 port 10101
-
2) I run netsed in transparent proxy mode as :
netsed
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:27:29PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any - 127.0.0.1 port 10101
netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
The traffic from XP gets redirected
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Instead of replacing the destination address in pf with rdr, try
leaving it as it is, but use route-to (lo0) to get the packet routed to
the loopback interface. This would require netsed to listen on
INADDR_ANY
On Friday 31 August 2007 15:10:15 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:33:53 +0200
Daniel Hartmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:27:29PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
rdr on $int_if proto tcp from 172.16.82.81 to any - 127.0.0.1 port
10101 netsed tcp
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
netsed's output is (part ) :
---
Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/luser]# netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
netsed 0.01b by Michal Zalewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[*] Parsing rule s/FOO/BAR
On Friday 31 August 2007 19:12:42 Mel wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2007 18:27:26 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
netsed's output is (part ) :
---
Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 31 August 2007 18:27:26 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
netsed's output is (part ) :
---
Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/luser]# netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
netsed 0.01b
On Friday 31 August 2007 18:27:26 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:40:06 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
netsed's output is (part ) :
---
Script started on Fri Aug 31 07:52:12 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/luser]# netsed tcp 10101 0 0 s/FOO/BAR
netsed 0.01b
12 matches
Mail list logo
