Hello All,
Please let's me know about freeradius+MySQL's paper to
configuretion and command to use that or shown me step by step for me to
config server to authenticate with freeradius+MySQL.
Sincere.
--
Chanin
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi guys,
We
are running FreeRADIUS Version 1.0.0. I've got a requirement which might
sound a little dumb.
We want to forward auth requests to
proxy serves based on matching the User-Password supplied by the NAS against
a regex. We use a mixture of vasco tokens and regular passworsd and
w
Hi.
I already installed NTRadPing in win2k.
I'ved tested the accounting, authentication through
it. When I checked the radacct table in MYSQL, there
are some attributes information unfilled or filled
with '0's.Hoe to get those missing information
availabale? How to simulate multiple user login at
Hi ,
I having a problem getting freeradius to work with this equipment. I have
read the FAQ and changed all information mentioned. I have gone through the
old mailing list archives back for 2 years and found 1 instance where no
resolution was posted. I went to the ascend list and found no sol
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Zohaib Tariq wrote:
> can anyone share cisco 5300 configuration that can work with freeradius
> server.
not quite sure what you after, since 5300 wouldnt care about which
software or platform you use to authorize your users.
its all a matter of correctly setting up you as530
Hi all,
can anyone share cisco 5300 configuration that can work with freeradius
server.
Thanks
Tariq
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Dear List,
I'm using freeRadius 0.9.3.
In the default block of users file,
Exec-Program-Wait = "/usr/local/iradius/radplug -t auth"
USR-Framed_IP_Address_Pool_Name = "ippool"
In some cases, my program is returning,
USR-Framed_IP_Address_Pool_Name := "unreg"
The 'man 5 users' says, it will overw
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Josh Howlett wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Alan DeKok wrote:
>
> > Josh Howlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In fact, the returned attributes in the second Access-Accept are the
> > > same as the first (when they should have been different).
> > >
> > > I am speculating he
8 matches
Mail list logo