Caspar Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> remarked:
> Michael Spencer recently noted (on the futurework listserv) the
> sociopathic nature of the publicly-held corporation. The correct word
> is sociopath ("a person who lacks social or moral responsibility
> because of a mental illness"- World Book Dicti
>It's hard to answer anything but "maybe" to these questions, which doesn't
>really satisfy me. "Ownership" is quite an abstract concept, and for all
>that Marxists talked about materialism they sure attached a lot of
>importance to something so abstract.
Back to some rudeness. I'm really begi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: usa-today.money,alt.politics.economics
Date: Thursday, December 03, 1998 6:22 PM
Subject: World Bank Economic Forecast
>
>
>December 2, 1998
>
>The World Bank (Wednesday) says the Asian financial and economic cri
Since we have a number of people on this list with an apparent interest in
a computational approach to social analysis...perhaps they might apply
their thoughts to the discussion in the URL below.
M
---
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 09:15:38 -0600
From: Jim Cou
"Changing work - changing unions"
Unions 21 Conference on Saturday 27 February 1999 9.30 - 5pm
at TUC Congress House, London, WC1
Featuring an opening plenary with
Peter Mandelson MP Trade and Industry Secretary and
John Monks TUC General Secretary
Building on its reputation Unions 21 brings yo
Date:Fri, 4 Dec 1998 17:23:08 -0500
From:Roy Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: UN Calls for Repeal of Ontario Act
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
United Nations Calls for Repeal of Ontario's Prevention of Unionism Act
Now it is official. The United Nations'
I haven't read this book, but it sounds relevant. Sally
>Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 14:36:31 -0500
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Precedence: bulk
>From: Robert Weissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Multiple recipients of list CORP-FOCUS <[EMAIL
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joan Sekler)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Alternative media in 1999
>Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 22:14:36 -0800
{snip}
>1. The video collective of LAAMN will be producing short 10-15 minute
>videos
> > is it all based on the present ownership mode?
> > Can your scheme simulate a system based on a different
> > economic base, such as common ownership?
>
> It's hard to answer anything but "maybe" to these questions, which doesn't
> really satisfy me. "Ownership" is quite an abstract concept
--
Hi all,
I try not to be a doomsayer. I truly believe that world civilizations
will not come to a screeching end on Jan 1, 2000.
Still, I do believe that we may suffer some serious inconveniences,
comparable to fires, floods, earthquakes, tornados, etc. And we have
had all those emerge
10 matches
Mail list logo
