Re: [Gendergap] Sharing an article

2011-09-03 Thread phoebe ayers
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Pete Forsyth wrote: > All, > I just ran across a short Wikipedia article I wrote a couple years ago, and > thought I'd share it. It's a bio of Frances Fuller Victor: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Fuller_Victor > Victor was generally known as a novelist of

Re: [Gendergap] Question for the Foundation about photographs of women

2011-09-03 Thread Pete Forsyth
It seems like we have strong consensus that a separate "customer support queue", run by and for women, would be a good idea. I certainly think so! Who here is active on OTRS? I'm on it, and on the email list, but I'm not active there. It might be best for somebody float the idea over there, see

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 8, Issue 4 Re: Increasing Visibility of Diversity and Women on Wikipedia (Sarah Stierch)

2011-09-03 Thread Fred Bauder
> Sarah, > > Yes those conversations were a real trial for me--it was like knocking my > head against a brick wall. And while I had some friends and knew of a > great > number of people who wanted to see these categories put in place, I was > not > allowed to let them know where the conversation wa

Re: [Gendergap] Question for the Foundation about photographs of women

2011-09-03 Thread John Vandenberg
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Fred Bauder wrote: >>.. >> Hi Fred, if it were an entirely separate address it would work, an >> email address that is only ever read by women volunteers. >> >> Sarah >> > > That is the way we need to go with perhaps a panel of specialized OTRS > volunteers, for thi

[Gendergap] High-heeled shoes as a case study

2011-09-03 Thread Sydney Poore
Category:High-heeled shoes is an excellent example of the current problem WMF projects are having with creating and disseminating content that is unbiased. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:High-heeled_shoes This category is different that most all the other categories about footwear bec

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 8, Issue 4 Re: Increasing Visibility of Diversity and Women on Wikipedia (Sarah Stierch)

2011-09-03 Thread Maggie
Sarah, Yes those conversations were a real trial for me--it was like knocking my head against a brick wall. And while I had some friends and knew of a great number of people who wanted to see these categories put in place, I was not allowed to let them know where the conversation was going on due

Re: [Gendergap] Question for the Foundation about photographs of women

2011-09-03 Thread Fred Bauder
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 03:14, Fred Bauder wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:22, John Vandenberg >>> wrote: As Sarah Stierch points out, our images of sexuality and reproduction are crap, broadly speaking, and our paperwork/processes are self-evidently not good for attracting h

Re: [Gendergap] Question for the Foundation about photographs of women

2011-09-03 Thread Sarah
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 03:14, Fred Bauder wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:22, John Vandenberg wrote: >>> As Sarah Stierch points out, our images of sexuality and reproduction >>> are crap, broadly speaking, and our paperwork/processes are >>> self-evidently not good for attracting high qualit

Re: [Gendergap] Sharing an article

2011-09-03 Thread Michael J. Lowrey
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote: > I thought, along with the more serious deliberations, it might be nice to > occasionally share interesting Wikipedia content we've worked on related to > gender. If you've worked on something that may be of interest to this list, > please sha

[Gendergap] Sharing an article

2011-09-03 Thread Pete Forsyth
All, I just ran across a short Wikipedia article I wrote a couple years ago, and thought I'd share it. It's a bio of Frances Fuller Victor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Fuller_Victor Victor was generally known as a novelist of the 19th century American West, but she also ghost-wrote tr

Re: [Gendergap] Question for the Foundation about photographs ofwomen

2011-09-03 Thread Daniel and Elizabeth Case
> (I am particularly concerned with bulk uploads from other services > that don't have such policies in place, such as Flickr, because > provenance and consent becomes very difficult to trace in that case.) This is, of course, another side effect of our overly dogmatic fair-use policy, where "it

Re: [Gendergap] "Childless couples"

2011-09-03 Thread Daniel and Elizabeth Case
The article for [[childfree]] is just as weird, including this odd photo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childfree#Motivations So glad we have a photo of a guy doing "research" to illustrate this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childfree#Statistics_and_research The same user, Tesseract2, added b

[Gendergap] "Childless couples"

2011-09-03 Thread Sarah Stierch
>From WP:Feminism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Feminism#Outrageous_male_bias Man our talk page has been blowing up lately The article for [[childfree]] is just as weird, including this odd photo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childfree#Motivations So glad we have a

Re: [Gendergap] Question for the Foundation about photographs of women

2011-09-03 Thread Sarah Stierch
Idea: 1. We design a wiki page like a call for artists for selected topics that we notice need quality images. 2. People who have connections to professional photographers (like me..I'm a consultant and I one of my services is strategic plans for private sector artists and studios, including half

Re: [Gendergap] Increasing Visibility of Diversity and Women on Wikipedia

2011-09-03 Thread Sarah Stierch
Here is the deletion log, for reference, regarding "African American women" it looks like the desire was to have it used as a main category and then have sub categories added to it, and I think that makes sense, but I also understand some aren't categorized. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:

Re: [Gendergap] Question for the Foundation about photographs of women

2011-09-03 Thread Fred Bauder
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:22, John Vandenberg wrote: >> As Sarah Stierch points out, our images of sexuality and reproduction >> are crap, broadly speaking, and our paperwork/processes are >> self-evidently not good for attracting high quality photographs.  What >> processes should we put in pla