Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

> > I would strongly advise against that, just on principle. > > yasm is an assembler, and as such it's right at the bottom of the stack. > It's not unreasonable for such a package to use different FLAGS etc as > it's not a userland app. It's an app that builds things you use to build > a userland.

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On 09/12/2017 11:37, Adam Carter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > > 0 > > > > However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -mar

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > > 0 > > > > However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it > > through. Where is the code that strips the others? > > > > Have you check

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > 0 > > However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it > through. Where is the code that strips the others? > Have you checked yasm's Makefile? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

[gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

# grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild 0 However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it through. Where is the code that strips the others?

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.4.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#x86-Options > lists what instruction sets gcc expects for any "-march=" > > I would suggest rebuilding with... > > CFLAGS="-march=nocona -O2 -pipe" > CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx sse sse2

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:23:10PM -0800, Manuel McLure wrote > Here's the situation. I have a system that's been running for many years > with an Athlon 5050e processor. The system is built with > > CFLAGS="-march=k8-sse3 -O2 -pipe -msse3" > CPU_FLAGS_X86="3dnow 3dnowext mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3"

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Manuel McLure wrote: > Here's the situation. I have a system that's been running for many years > with an Athlon 5050e processor. The system is built with > > CFLAGS="-march=k8-sse3 -O2 -pipe -msse3" > CPU_FLAGS_X86="3dnow 3dnowext mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" > > I ha

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

Here's the situation. I have a system that's been running for many years with an Athlon 5050e processor. The system is built with CFLAGS="-march=k8-sse3 -O2 -pipe -msse3" CPU_FLAGS_X86="3dnow 3dnowext mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" I have the possibility of upgrading the system to a first-generation I

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:11:52 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am 30.04.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:26:22 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> That simple. The kernel is too important and the people programming it > >> know what they are doing.

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Am 30.04.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: > Hi, > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:26:22 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> That simple. The kernel is too important and the people programming it >> know what they are doing. Don't set anything. It is retarded. >>> - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS="-

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Hi, On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:26:22 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > That simple. The kernel is too important and the people programming it > know what they are doing. Don't set anything. It is retarded. > > > > - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS="-O2 -march=foo"make' > > - I don't want to set CFLAGS

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Am 29.04.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Ralf: > Damn, you're absolutely right. > > I just tested it using make V=1. > kernel make does override CFLAGs from the outside. > > But that's interesting: my processor supports -march=core-avx2 and none > of the linux kernel processor family uses this flag... that

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Am 29.04.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Ralf: > Hi, > > just a short question: I don't like genkernel, I always compile my > kernel manually using menuconfig. > So the CFLAGs of my make.conf won't get applied. as it should be. > > What is the best way to (persistently) set the CFLAGs for the kernel > compi

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:31:13 +0200 Ralf wrote: > Hi, > > just a short question: I don't like genkernel, I always compile my > kernel manually using menuconfig. > So the CFLAGs of my make.conf won't get applied. > > What is the best way to (persistently) set the CFLAGs for the kernel > compilation

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: > > > - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS="-O2 -march=foo"make' > > - I don't want to set CFLAGS as a persistent environment variable. > > Does the kernel building use the CFLAGS at all? > You probably want CFLAGS_KERNEL and maybe CFLAGS_MOD

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Damn, you're absolutely right. I just tested it using make V=1. kernel make does override CFLAGs from the outside. But that's interesting: my processor supports -march=core-avx2 and none of the linux kernel processor family uses this flag... Thx Ralf On 04/29/2015 02:41 PM, Emanuele Rusconi w

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

> - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS="-O2 -march=foo"make' > - I don't want to set CFLAGS as a persistent environment variable. Does the kernel building use the CFLAGS at all? The arch is set during the configuration step ("Processor type and features" / "Processor family"), and there's an "optimize

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:31:13 +0200, Ralf wrote: > just a short question: I don't like genkernel, I always compile my > kernel manually using menuconfig. > So the CFLAGs of my make.conf won't get applied. > > What is the best way to (persistently) set the CFLAGs for the kernel > compilation? > >

[gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Hi, just a short question: I don't like genkernel, I always compile my kernel manually using menuconfig. So the CFLAGs of my make.conf won't get applied. What is the best way to (persistently) set the CFLAGs for the kernel compilation? - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS="-O2 -march=foo"make' - I do

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

Thank you. I'll stick to -march=native for now Walter Dnes wrote: >On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:38:48AM +0400, German wrote >> Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you > > If you're building on the target machine, use the "native" CFLAG. It >has been around for a while. It detects the CP

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:38:48AM +0400, German wrote: > Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you Well, why not give the standard "-O2 -march=native" a whirl, perhaps seasoned with "-pipe". Or look at what march=native would actually yield: Create a simple c file: cat > test.c << EOF int

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:38:48AM +0400, German wrote > Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you If you're building on the target machine, use the "native" CFLAG. It has been around for a while. It detects the CPU, and builds for it "automagically". You don't have to do any more grunt

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:45:35AM +1100, Adam Carter wrote: > If you havent already, I would first verify that its actually CPU bound, > before changing CFLAGs and recompiling everything. So take a look at top, > vmstat, mpstat etc when you're noticing slowness. If it is truely CPU bound > and you

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

If you havent already, I would first verify that its actually CPU bound, before changing CFLAGs and recompiling everything. So take a look at top, vmstat, mpstat etc when you're noticing slowness. If it is truely CPU bound and you're going to recompile everything, you could consider upgrading to th

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Silvio Siefke wrote: > Hello, > > on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. > I have Samsung NC10 and there is running Gentoo better and that i understand > not so really. > > What Cflags i should use, at moment i use > > CFLAGS="-

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

В письме от 21 октября 2013 18:40:27 пользователь Frank Steinmetzger написал: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:15:30 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger > > > > wrote: > > > Do they have different amounts of RAM installed? My netbook

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:15:30 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger > wrote: > > > Do they have different amounts of RAM installed? My netbook ran OK > > with 1 GB, but was very limited, especially once Firefox was loaded. > > 2 GB sh

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

Hello, On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:15:30 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Do they have different amounts of RAM installed? My netbook ran OK > with 1 GB, but was very limited, especially once Firefox was loaded. > 2 GB should be the minimum if you use a big desktop. No its only 1 GB. I use XFCE4 an

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:20:42AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > I have four core: > Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz Wikipedia says otherwise: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors#Dual-core_Nettop_processors -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

I have four core: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz CFLAGS="-march=core2 -O2 -pipe" CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" MAKEOPTS="-j5" -- Joseph On 10/21/13 16:09, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. I have Samsung NC10 and there is ru

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: > Hello, > > on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. > I have Samsung NC10 and there is running Gentoo better and that i understand > not so really. Do they have different amounts of RAM installed?

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

Hello, On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:33:37 +0100 thegeezer wrote: > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/CFLAGS > > use native - it does the working out for you if GCC is new > CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" Ok thank you. Hope then better. Now compile orgy so 2 days and i have finished. Thank you & Nice D

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On 10/21/2013 03:09 PM, Silvio Siefke wrote: > Hello, > > on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. > I have Samsung NC10 and there is running Gentoo better and that i understand > not so really. > > What Cflags i should use, at moment i use > > CFLAGS="-O2 -march

[gentoo-user] cflags for atom

Hello, on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. I have Samsung NC10 and there is running Gentoo better and that i understand not so really. What Cflags i should use, at moment i use CFLAGS="-O2 -march=atom -mtune=atom -mssse3 -mfpmath=sse -fomit-frame-pointer

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

Volker Armin Hemmann writes: > and of course we all just use our crystal balls because it is so easy > without the error message. Hmm, something about X shutting down in kdm.log. Can't check now because the system is down. But anyway, I don't think it matters, the problem is that the crash happen

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

Am Montag, 12. März 2012, 12:32:01 schrieb Alex Schuster: > Hi there! > > Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some > updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that > x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict > CFLAGS, instead of just

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

Helmut Jarausch writes: > On 03/12/2012 12:32:01 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: > > The command above does not tell about SSE stuff, so I used this one to > > find out about that: > > > > leela # echo | gcc -dME - -march=native | grep -Ei 'SSE|3DNOW|MMX' | Typo: The -E must be separate: gcc -dM -E

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

On 03/12/2012 12:32:01 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: Hi there! Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict CFLAGS, instead of just using -march=native.

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

Hi there! Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict CFLAGS, instead of just using -march=native. Her CPU is an AMD A6-3500 with three cores. As I

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 07/28/2011 11:51:29 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Helmut Jarausch < > jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > > > On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > > My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1 > > > Can someone confirm this? > > > > I don't think so

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Helmut Jarausch < jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1 > > Can someone confirm this? > > I don't think so. It's part of the war Intel <-> AMD > > Helmut. > > Can y

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1 > Can someone confirm this? I don't think so. It's part of the war Intel <-> AMD Helmut.

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson > > >> > > >> Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run: > > >> $ gcc -### -e

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 2011-07-27 20:32, Mick wrote: > It seems that on my early i7, the -march=core2 does not have all the -msse* > flags enabled, while native does: Acc. to this there is a flag for i7, BUT... I'm not sure if current stable version accepts it: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 21:24:33 Mark Knecht wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mick wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > >> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson > >> > > >> >> Another good t

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson >> >> >> >>  Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run: >> >> $ gcc -### -e -v -

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson > >> > >> Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run: > >> $ gcc -### -e -v -march=native /usr/include/stdlib.h > >> > >> The la

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson wrote: > >> ** >> On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote: >> >> On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote: >> >> >> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz >> >> >> >> >> I gues

RE: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

-original message- Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU From: Andy Wilkinson Date: 2011-07-27 21:09 >Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run: > >$ gcc -### -e -v -march=native /usr/include/stdlib.h > >The last line of output will include the various CFLAGS

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson wrote: > ** > On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote: > > On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote: > > > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz > > > > > I guess *core2* is the right one? > > Yes, acc. > to:http://en.gentoo-wiki

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote: > On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote: > >> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz > > >> I guess *core2* is the right one? > Yes, acc. to: > http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/Intel#Core_2_Duo.2FQuad.2C_Xeon_51xx.2F53xx.2F54xx.2F3

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:58 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Alokat wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? > > > > cat /proc/cpuinfo > [snip] > > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz > > [snip] > > ..

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011 20:02:05 Paul Hartman wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat wrote: >> > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? >> >> Hi, >> >> I think, in your case, core2 is the correct one. >> >> If you run this comman

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011 20:02:05 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat wrote: > > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? > > Hi, > > I think, in your case, core2 is the correct one. > > If you run this command: > gcc -Q --help=target -march=native > > gcc wil

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote: > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz > I guess *core2* is the right one? Yes, acc. to: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/Intel#Core_2_Duo.2FQuad.2C_Xeon_51xx.2F53xx.2F54xx.2F3360.2C_Pentium_Dual-Core_T23xx.2B.2FE.2C

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat wrote: > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? Hi, I think, in your case, core2 is the correct one. If you run this command: gcc -Q --help=target -march=native gcc will tell you what it thinks are the best options for your CPU.

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tuesday 26 July 2011 20:36:14 Alokat did opine thusly: > Hi folks, > > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? > > cat /proc/cpuinfo > .. > > processor : 1 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 15 > model name : Intel(R) Co

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Alokat wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? > > cat /proc/cpuinfo > .. > > processor   : 1 > vendor_id   : GenuineIntel > cpu family  : 6 > model   : 15 > model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo C

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Alokat wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? > > cat /proc/cpuinfo [snip] > model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100  @ 1.20GHz [snip] > .. > > After a short research on this website: > http://gcc.gnu.or

[gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

Hi folks, I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? cat /proc/cpuinfo .. processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz stepping: 11 cpu MHz : 1197.0

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

I feel like the Pentium D is "march=prescott" though, again, native should work fine as well. Chris Reffett On 11/02/2010 06:40 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote: > On Tuesday 02 November 2010 2:13:41 pm Coert Waagmeester wrote: >> I have installed a 64 bit gentoo on my intel Pentium D machine. > also as far

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Tuesday 02 November 2010 2:13:41 pm Coert Waagmeester wrote: > I have installed a 64 bit gentoo on my intel Pentium D machine. also as far as i know, core2 is for core 2 duo quad etc cpus ... not for pentium D. > -O2 -march=core2 -pipe use native as Alan suggested. or refer to http://www.g

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Apparently, though unproven, at 10:43 on Tuesday 02 November 2010, Coert Waagmeester did opine thusly: > Hello all, > > Possible noob question. > > I have installed a 64 bit gentoo on my intel Pentium D machine. > Now I am reading through /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example > > My CFLA

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Am 02.11.2010 09:43, schrieb Coert Waagmeester: Hello all, Hello! Possible noob question. We all was noobs once, maybe I am still ;-) If I do change, how do I recompile everything? (like --newuse for USE changes?) To recompile all use emerge -e world The switch -e lets portage think tha

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Hello all, Possible noob question. I have installed a 64 bit gentoo on my intel Pentium D machine. Now I am reading through /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example My CFLAGS on that machine is the default currently: CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" But according to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-am

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

On Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008, KH wrote: > James wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > Current CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" > > > > > > I want to add "-fomit-frame-pointer" to my > > CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running > > for months. > > > > > > Is this safe or do I have to rebuild eve

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

Dale wrote: James wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" I want to add "-fomit-frame-pointer" to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike "emerge -e" ? Should it be avoided completely?

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:53:56 + (UTC), James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > Current CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" > > > I want to add "-fomit-frame-pointer" to my > CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running > for months. > > > Is this safe or do I have to rebuild ev

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

On Thursday 21 February 2008, James wrote: > Hello, > > > Current CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" > > > I want to add "-fomit-frame-pointer" to my > CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running > for months. > > > Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with > somelike "emerge -e" ?

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

James wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" I want to add "-fomit-frame-pointer" to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike "emerge -e" ? Should it be avoided completely? James

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

Hello On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:53:56PM +, James wrote: > Current CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" > > > I want to add "-fomit-frame-pointer" to my > CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running > for months. Vim syntax highlighting does not show it in red, so I guess it means it is c

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

James wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" I want to add "-fomit-frame-pointer" to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike "emerge -e" ? Should it be avoided completely? James N

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

Hello, Current CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -pipe" I want to add "-fomit-frame-pointer" to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike "emerge -e" ? Should it be avoided completely? James -- gentoo-user@li

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:10:11 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Itanium2. > > You don't want to go there. Trust me. > > It's a bastard evolution of one of Intel's worst ideas ever I thought that would be Pentium 4 EE. :P -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:42:37 Tomas Papan wrote: > > in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and > > -march=nocona > > OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? Itanium2. You don't want to go there. Trust me. It's a bastard evoluti

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008 15:36:51 Kenneth Prugh wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:38:47 + > Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? > > Intel Itanium processors. (Your T7100 is a Core2) Of course. Thanks again; also to Etaoin. -- Rgds Peter -- gento

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags > Intel Core 2 Duo/Quad / Xeon 51xx/53xx > > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 15 > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU @ XXXGHz > > *32 bit profile (x86)* > > CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" > CFLAGS="-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-p

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:38:47 + Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:42:37 Tomas Papan wrote: > > > in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and -march=nocona > > OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? > Intel Itanium processors. (Your T7100 is a

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:42:37 Tomas Papan wrote: > in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and -march=nocona OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? -- Rgds Peter -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Just a tiny hijack :-) > > My new laptop will have a T7100 CPU. I'd like to know what CFLAGS to > use, but even before that should I use an AMD64 or IA64 installation > medium? Maybe this wiki page could help: http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflag

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

hello, in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and -march=nocona BR tomas Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 19:54:42 Kenneth Prugh wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:21 +0100 >> >> Cahn Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'll have soon a

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Wednesday 16 January 2008 19:54:42 Kenneth Prugh wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:21 +0100 > > Cahn Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'll have soon a new PC with Processor > > Intel Core2 Duo E6850 > > Which cflags do I need for it? > > Thank you very much. > > Roger > > CFLAG

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On 1/16/08, Kenneth Prugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe" CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -pipe" would be sufficient. On my system, it gives me (I have a core 2 duo) CFLAGS="-O2 -march=nocona -mtune=generic -pipe" while with gcc-4.3, I get CFLAGS="-O2 -march=

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:04:11 +0100 Michal 'vorner' Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:54:42PM -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe" > > Could this happen a default in clean installation/manual sometime? > Most people c

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Hello On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:54:42PM -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe" Could this happen a default in clean installation/manual sometime? Most people could leave this lake it is and never think about what flags to use. -- Please stay calm. There is

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:21 +0100 Cahn Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'll have soon a new PC with Processor > Intel Core2 Duo E6850 > Which cflags do I need for it? > Thank you very much. > Roger CFLAGS="-O2 -march=nocona -pipe" should do it if your running stable AMD64. If you h

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Hi, I'll have soon a new PC with Processor Intel Core2 Duo E6850 Which cflags do I need for it? Thank you very much. Roger -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Neil Bothwick schrieb: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:34:40 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > I found some notes on the net "amd64 is for x86_64", unsure about that ... >>> That's right, the architecture was originally for the AMD 64-bit >>> chips. >> Thanks for clearing that, not very

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:34:40 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > >> I found some notes on the net "amd64 is for x86_64", unsure about > >> that ... > > > > That's right, the architecture was originally for the AMD 64-bit > > chips. > > Thanks for clearing that, not very intuitive :) I

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Neil Bothwick schrieb: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:16:37 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > >> Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from >> scratch, getting a 64-bit-system with the Core2Duo E6600? > > Yes. > >> I found some notes on the net "amd64 is for x86_64",

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:16:37 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from > scratch, getting a 64-bit-system with the Core2Duo E6600? Yes. > I found some notes on the net "amd64 is for x86_64", unsure about > that ... That's righ

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb: > Maybe I will give it a try on another hdd and try to do a fresh install > of x86_64 on that E2160, if the winter is long and boring ;-) Additional question here: Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from scratch, getting a 64-bit-sys

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Saturday 10 Nov 2007 19:20 in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> of linux.gentoo.user, Bo Ørsted Andresen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote: >> If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: >>emerge -e system >>emerge -e

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Nov 10, 2007 2:18 PM, David W Noon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: >emerge -e system >emerge -e world > you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. This > was what you were planning anyway, but the chang

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Bo Ørsted Andresen schrieb: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote: >> If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: >>emerge -e system >>emerge -e world >> you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. > > Clearly you are compl

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote: > If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: >emerge -e system >emerge -e world > you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. Clearly you are completely clueless. Do *NOT* do this. It w

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Am Samstag, 10. November 2007 schrieb David W Noon: > If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: >emerge -e system >emerge -e world Since -e means "emptytree" (as in dependency tree), the latter would be enough, right? Bye... Dirk signature.asc Descript

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 10 Nov 2007 09:30 in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> of linux.gentoo.user, Stefan G. Weichinger([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > David W Noon schrieb: > >> You need to consider CHOST as well, to ensure you make the most of >> the newer CPUs. >> >

  1   2   >