On August 31, 2005 04:02 am, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 30 August 2005 16:31, bshlists wrote:
> > On August 30, 2005 10:51 am, Holly Bostick wrote:
> > > Afaik, it's not a change to a config file, it's a change in the way you
> > > generate the initramfs.
> > >
> > > If you compile it into the kernel (i
On 30 August 2005 16:31, bshlists wrote:
> On August 30, 2005 10:51 am, Holly Bostick wrote:
> > Afaik, it's not a change to a config file, it's a change in the way you
> > generate the initramfs.
> >
> > If you compile it into the kernel (instructions on the Wiki; see How-to
> > fbsplash), it wil
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 15:51, Holly Bostick wrote:
> bshlists schreef:
> > Using all the suggestions on this thread I was able to get
> > gensplash up and running. I however have one small problem the
> > bootsplash come up some 1/3 the way through the bootup process.
> > Now I remember seein
bshlists schreef:
> On August 30, 2005 10:51 am, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>>bshlists schreef:
>>
>>>Using all the suggestions on this thread I was able to get gensplash up
>>>and running. I however have one small problem the bootsplash come up
>>>some 1/3 the way through the bootup process. Now I
On August 30, 2005 10:51 am, Holly Bostick wrote:
> bshlists schreef:
> > Using all the suggestions on this thread I was able to get gensplash up
> > and running. I however have one small problem the bootsplash come up
> > some 1/3 the way through the bootup process. Now I remember seeing
> > so
bshlists schreef:
> Using all the suggestions on this thread I was able to get gensplash up and
> running. I however have one small problem the bootsplash come up some 1/3
> the way through the bootup process. Now I remember seeing somewhere a change
> to a config file which would change when
On August 23, 2005 04:25 am, Nagatoro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got another "interesting" problem with the splash. It seems like
> no matter what I specify the computer always wants to use a 800x600
> resolution.
>
> At startup I get this (not word for word since showconsole won't play
> nicely):
On 23 August 2005 20:14, Holly Bostick wrote:
Sorry, forgot this in my other posting.
> Oh, and btw, Nagatoro... it's silly, but just open up your grub.conf
> with nano and make sure that some word-wrap somewhere didn't mess up
> your kernel line. That happened to me a couple of times, and in tha
On 23 August 2005 20:14, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Matthias Krebs schreef:
> > And as
> > someone else mentioned before, vesafb-tng is not a valid kernel
> > parameter, so everything after it is ignored.
>
> In what world is this? If you're using vesafb-tng (added to the kernel
> options by the fbspla
Holly Bostick wrote:
wrap) will be ignored. So opening up the file with nano and going to the
beginning of any apparently wrapped line and hitting Backspace to pull
it all together is not a bad idea.
Nope al in one line.
On side note I found some fourum posting claming that agppart and
nvidia
Matthias Krebs schreef:
> On 8/23/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Matthias Krebs schreef:
>>
>>>And as
>>>someone else mentioned before, vesafb-tng is not a valid kernel
>>>parameter, so everything after it is ignored.
>>
>>In what world is this? If you're using vesafb-tng (added
On 8/23/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Krebs schreef:
> > And as
> > someone else mentioned before, vesafb-tng is not a valid kernel
> > parameter, so everything after it is ignored.
>
> In what world is this? If you're using vesafb-tng (added to the kernel
> options by th
Matthias Krebs wrote:
Maybe you want to use a mode your graphic board doesn't support. Do a
"cat /proc/fb0/modes" to get the modes your board supports. And as
Well that's where it get weird! cat /proc/fb0/modes report that
800x600 *is* the highest resolution I can have but I've had 1280x1024
Matthias Krebs schreef:
> And as
> someone else mentioned before, vesafb-tng is not a valid kernel
> parameter, so everything after it is ignored.
In what world is this? If you're using vesafb-tng (added to the kernel
options by the fbsplash patch which you get with the gentoo kernels,
which is no
> Sorry didn't work.
> The 8bpp message did dissapear but the framebuffer still want's to
> read the config file for 800x600.
>
> --
> Naga
Maybe you want to use a mode your graphic board doesn't support. Do a
"cat /proc/fb0/modes" to get the modes your board supports. And as
someone else mentione
Nagatoro schreef:
> Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>> Yes... you see your kernel config for the default mode? It does not
>> specify a bit depth. Neither did mine. Change the setting in the
>> kernel to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> (or whatever your preferred resolution is, thereby specifying a bit
>> depth to
Holly Bostick wrote:
Yes... you see your kernel config for the default mode? It does not
specify a bit depth. Neither did mine. Change the setting in the kernel to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(or whatever your preferred resolution is, thereby specifying a bit
depth to the kernel config)
recompile the kerne
Michael Kintzios wrote:
Did you re-emerge your splashutils and rerun genitramfs with /boot
mounted? Also, did you check the resolution for your vesa-tng entry in
the kernel menuconfig? (see Holly's previous post on this topic).
Yes, unfortunaly no change.
--
Naga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org ma
Nagatoro schreef:
> Hi,
>
> I've got another "interesting" problem with the splash. It seems like
> no matter what I specify the computer always wants to use a 800x600
> resolution.
>
> At startup I get this (not word for word since showconsole won't play
> nicely):
> ---
> can't open config file
> -Original Message-
> From: Nagatoro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 August 2005 13:23
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] More splash problems
>
>
> Uwe Thiem wrote:
> >
> > Try "video=vesafb:..." instea
Uwe Thiem wrote:
Try "video=vesafb:..." instead of "vesafb-tng".
Same thing...
--
Naga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 23 August 2005 09:25, Nagatoro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got another "interesting" problem with the splash. It seems like
> no matter what I specify the computer always wants to use a 800x600
> resolution.
>
> At startup I get this (not word for word since showconsole won't play
> nicely):
> ---
> c
Michael Kintzios wrote:
Have you tried: [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Same result I'm afraid :(
--
Naga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> -Original Message-
> From: Nagatoro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 August 2005 09:26
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-user] More splash problems
>
> But as you can see below i specify a 1280x1024 resolution in 16bpp
> mode (same
Hi,
I've got another "interesting" problem with the splash. It seems like
no matter what I specify the computer always wants to use a 800x600
resolution.
At startup I get this (not word for word since showconsole won't play
nicely):
---
can't open config file /etc/splash/livecd-2005.1/800x600.
25 matches
Mail list logo
