Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 12:13, Nich Steicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Web mail':
modern, i would advise RoundCube - though its main draw back is its
reliance on Java (its written in AJAX) - i personly
AJA
JimD wrote:
Manuel McLure wrote:
I *just* (as in an hour or so ago) upgraded from courier-imap to dovecot.
On large folders (1000+ messages) dovecot is *much* faster. I'd say
around
5x faster when bringing up the folder in Squirrelmail.
Any major changes in setup? Any quirks with your fav
Martin Richardson wrote:
Hi Jim,
I have not actually installed a web mail client, so I can't talk
from experience, but I was considering doing so a while back. Have You
had a look at horde or more specifically horde-imp? Looked good for me
at the time.
Good luck.
No I have not. Ho
Manuel McLure wrote:
I *just* (as in an hour or so ago) upgraded from courier-imap to dovecot.
On large folders (1000+ messages) dovecot is *much* faster. I'd say around
5x faster when bringing up the folder in Squirrelmail.
Any major changes in setup? Any quirks with your fav. client?
Jim
-
Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
I never heard of it as "event driven programming", but I think what it
should refer to is the MVC pattern. The "events" for web applications
are of such a homogenuous nature that it has no worth to think of it as
"event driven". One needs a good understanding of MVC and
Michael Sullivan wrote:
I know about event-driven programming (I wrote in VB for years before I
achieved the enlightenment of Linux), but I didn't know that it was
possible with PHP. I use event-driven techniques in Gambas and qt. I
always thought squirrelmail code was like that for security p
> Nick Rout wrote:
> I am running courier as well. I haven't tried dovecot. My largest
> folder has about 75 emails so I guess performance should be fine.
> I am the opposite and delete everything. It has come to bite me in the
> bum many times. I need to start saving emails.
I *just* (as in a
On 23:14 Tue 02 May , Jim wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a webmail client? I am looking for something more
> modern than
> SquuirrelMal. I have been using SquuirrelMal, however I find it the
> interface too old
> and outdated.
>
> I also looking into the code to see if I could freshen it up
Hi,
On Wed, 03 May 2006 08:59:23 -0500
Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know about event-driven programming (I wrote in VB for years before I
> achieved the enlightenment of Linux), but I didn't know that it was
> possible with PHP. I use event-driven techniques in Gambas and qt.
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 12:13, Nich Steicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Web mail':
> modern, i would advise RoundCube - though its main draw back is its
> reliance on Java (its written in AJAX) - i personly
AJAX = Asynchronous Javascript And XML
Ja
JimD wrote:
The SquirrelMail source code is trash.
I haven't gone through all of it, or even much of it to really know.
Though the compose.php page was a real mess. All I wanted to do was
line the form buttons up nicely : )
Jim
i personly use both SquirrelMail and roundcube for my web
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 00:37 -0400, JimD wrote:
> Michael Sullivan wrote:
>
> > What other style is there besides procedural?
>
> A much better way IMO is to separate the presentation from the code like
> you can do with ASP.Net with Mono/MS. ASP.Net makes web app development
> *event* orient
Nick Rout wrote:
you could take a look at roundcube.net
Your the second person to mention roundcube. Has everyone heard of
Roundcube but me? : )
It looks nice and I will go check it out.
I am connecting to courier imap on the same box with some very large
(read: owned by a lazy b'stard) m
kashani wrote:
Moving on to the webmail bit, I like Roundcube as well. My personal
server is completely overbuilt so it seems as snappy as Squirrel. If
you're using PHP 4.4, I'd install pecl-apc which should speed things up
greatly. pecl-apc has *issues* with PHP 5.1.x especially if you'r
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
The output of ASP.Net is trash. Most notably it doesn't gracefully degrade
as the browser loses features, and generates unnecessary round-trips to
the server.
That was true for *Microsoft's* ASP.Net 1.1. The output HTML for the MS
supplied controls was pretty
Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 23:14 -0400, Jim wrote:
Can anyone recommend a webmail client? I am looking for something more modern
than
SquuirrelMal. I have been using SquuirrelMal, however I find it the interface
too old
and outdated.
I also looking into the code to see if
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 23:37, JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Web mail':
> Michael Sullivan wrote:
> > What other style is there besides procedural?
>
> A much better way IMO is to separate the presentation from the code like
> yo
you could take a look at roundcube.net
There is an ebuild referred to in bugzilla (which actually points to an
svn server somewhere else).
I installed it a day or so ago. the postinstall instructions needed some
tweaking (mainly quoting on the mysql commands) but sorry i didn't make
notes.
The
Michael Sullivan wrote:
What other style is there besides procedural?
A much better way IMO is to separate the presentation from the code like
you can do with ASP.Net with Mono/MS. ASP.Net makes web app development
*event* oriented. You write event handlers to handle certain events
like
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 23:14 -0400, Jim wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a webmail client? I am looking for something more
> modern than
> SquuirrelMal. I have been using SquuirrelMal, however I find it the
> interface too old
> and outdated.
>
> I also looking into the code to see if I could fres
Can anyone recommend a webmail client? I am looking for something more modern
than
SquuirrelMal. I have been using SquuirrelMal, however I find it the interface
too old
and outdated.
I also looking into the code to see if I could freshen it up. From a quick
look, the
code is based on really
21 matches
Mail list logo
