Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

I would be willing to spend some time on this; although I am unfamiliar with what the previous work on other plugins was about. In particular, I do not know what "marked them for translation" means (if this is referring to some type of foreign language translation then I am most likely a po

[Gimp-developer] Modifiers before or after first click in selection tools (was Re: status bar messages)

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:21:46 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:08 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > > Anyway, my main argument is that it would be more consistent with the > > other tools: the other selection tools, the transform tools and the > > zoom tool onl

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for better status bar messages

On Thursday, June 22, 2006, 8:21:46, Sven Neumann wrote: > This wouldn't have happened to you if you have had a look at the cursor > changes. BTW, does anyone object to removing the possibility of turning > context dependant cursors off? They are very important and I can't > really imagine that so

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for libgimpmetadata API

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:10:19 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:35 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > > Cleaner code (core/GUI separation, maintainable by different people), > > lower overhead (especially when changing many properties) and more > > importantly pro

Re: Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for better status bar messages

On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:56:36PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote: > Von: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:49:22AM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > > Carol Spears wrote: > > > > > > > it would not stay toggled and it seemed to be blind to the colors no > > >

Re: [Gimp-developer] proposal for libgimpmetadata API

Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:33 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > Well, let's say that it makes it a bit easier if the code is at least > split in separate directories (even if a library is not required for that). > As for the lower overhead, it does make a difference if the file plug-ins > can link

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would be willing to spend some time on this; although I am > unfamiliar with what the previous work on other plugins was about. In > particular, I do not know what "marked them for translation" means (if > this is referring