Re: [Gimp-user] unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

2004-10-02 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 09:11:25PM -0700, Barton Bosch wrote: > > Yup, just trying to make the document a little lighter weight. The > basic purpse of the doc is as a series of reference charts and > tables that will be hyperlinked -- eliminating the need to > repeatedly refer to the paper book t

Re: [Gimp-user] unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

2004-10-02 Thread Barton Bosch
Carol Spears wrote: On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 02:07:43PM -0700, Barton Bosch wrote: I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting. i am curious for the reason for saving at the 50% quality setting. fiddling with th

Re: [Gimp-user] unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

2004-10-02 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 02:07:43PM -0700, Barton Bosch wrote: > I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened > with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting. > i am curious for the reason for saving at the 50% quality setting. fiddling with the quality sett

[Gimp-user] unsharp mask and jpg with quality setting change

2004-10-02 Thread Barton Bosch
I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting. Should the operations be performed in the order above or would it be better to scale->save as 50% qual jpg->unsharp mask->save as 100% qual jpg? Thanks, Barton __