>I am planning a upgrade of my machine, so I am trying to find out, if I
>can have any advantage of a dual processor system, because it actually
>is cheaper with a dual Celleron 500 MHz as a 700 MHz Athlon/AMD or PIII,
>and I have 256 Mb PC100 RAM, which will be to slow for these mach
Hi, all!
Mogens JÖger wrote:
> Hey there.
> I am planning a upgrade of my machine, so I am trying to find out, if I
> can have any advantage of a dual processor system, because it actually
> is cheaper with a dual Celleron 500 MHz as a 700 MHz Athlon/AMD or PIII,
> and I have 2
processors, even if the OS
can.
Brian Weber wrote:
> The dual processor part is handled in the kernel. I have a dual PII
> 266 Mhz which I am very happy with. Linux does a great job handling the
> two processors equally. I have done tests and my dual PII 266 goes
> about as fast
The dual processor part is handled in the kernel. I have a dual PII
266 Mhz which I am very happy with. Linux does a great job handling the
two processors equally. I have done tests and my dual PII 266 goes
about as fast as a PII 450 Mhz single. Part of that might be because I
am
Hey there.
I am planning a upgrade of my machine, so I am trying to find out, if I
can have any advantage of a dual processor system, because it actually
is cheaper with a dual Celleron 500 MHz as a 700 MHz Athlon/AMD or PIII,
and I have 256 Mb PC100 RAM, which will be to slow for these machines
