On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> Right now I've just added an error when using remote repositories. But
>> it seems there's no way around it; if we want to have support for
>> remote repos, we need to make a
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Johannes Schindelin
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Without push support, remote-hg is useless to me. Without regression
>> > tests proving that it is rock solid, I
Hi Felipe,
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>
> > Without push support, remote-hg is useless to me. Without regression
> > tests proving that it is rock solid, I will not use remote-hg.
>
> Done and done. My remote-hg
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 17.10.2012 14:58:
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
>> ---
>>
>> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too complicated, or
>> too
>> slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
>
> It's in
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 17.10.2012 14:58:
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
> ---
>
> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too complicated, or
> too
> slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
It's in an unsatisfying state, I agree. We have a great remote helper
infra
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Basically what I already described:
> 1) You need a non-vanilla version of git
> 2) It's not easy to set up
> 3) It's not even clear which branch you should be using (in case you
> are not using msysgit)
I do not read that as "it does not work", but instead as "no one
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>>> As to the functionality you seek: git-remote-hg found in
>>> git://github.com/msysgit/git works. It has the following advantages over
>>> every other solution, including the one proposed in this thread:
>>>
>
Felipe Contreras writes:
>> As to the functionality you seek: git-remote-hg found in
>> git://github.com/msysgit/git works. It has the following advantages over
>> every other solution, including the one proposed in this thread:
>>
>> - it works
>>
>> - no really, it works
>
> Not for me.
Felipe
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Sverre Rabbelier
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> > wrote:
>> >> Right now I've just added an error when
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Sverre Rabbelier
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Felipe Contreras
> > wrote:
> >> Right now I've just added an error when using remote repositories.
> >> But it seems there's no way around it; if
Hi Felipe,
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>
> So your idea of collaboration is accept that your code is awesome, and
> my code sucks, and that I should fix your code, and throw my code to the
> trash, while you do abs
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> Right now I've just added an error when using remote repositories. But
>> it seems there's no way around it; if we want to have support for
>> remote repos, we need to make a
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Sverre Rabbelier
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Felipe Contreras
>> > wrote:
>> >> But fine, lets remove the tests o
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> The first thing I tried was:
>>
>> $ git clone hg::https://code.google.com/p/dactyl/
>
> Right, doesn't look like it works for remote repositories. I think
> that's the next feature
Hi Felipe,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Sverre Rabbelier
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Felipe Contreras
> > wrote:
> >> But fine, lets remove the tests out of the equation (150 lines), the
> >> number of lines of code still ex
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Right now I've just added an error when using remote repositories. But
> it seems there's no way around it; if we want to have support for
> remote repos, we need to make a local clone.
My git-remote-hg does the local clone into .git/ us
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>>> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too complicated, or
>>> too
>>> slow, or to difficult
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too complicated, or
>> too
>> slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
>
> I run into this every few months, evaluate all
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too complicated, or
> too
> slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
I run into this every few months, evaluate all of the options, and come
to the same conclusion. So I am exc
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> But fine, lets remove the tests out of the equation (150 lines), the
>> number of lines of code still exceeds 3000.
>
> I don't think it's fair to just look at LOC, git-remote
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> But fine, lets remove the tests out of the equation (150 lines), the
> number of lines of code still exceeds 3000.
I don't think it's fair to just look at LOC, git-remote-hg when it was
just parsing was fairly simple. Most of the current
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Johannes Schindelin
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too
>
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >
> >> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too
> >> complicated, or too slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
> >
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too complicated,
>> or too slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
>
> The one I merged into Git for Windows (since that is what I in
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too complicated,
> or too slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
The one I merged into Git for Windows (since that is what I install on all
my machines even if they run Linux) is rock-solid.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
---
I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too complicated, or too
slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
The only one I've liked so far is hg-fast-export[1], which is indeed fast,
relatively simple, and relatively easy to use. But it's not properly
26 matches
Mail list logo
