Re: [PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

Jonathan Nieder writes: > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > >> Oops, I read about `--pretty` in pretty-formats.txt and didn't realize >> that `--format` existed. However, your patch is still wrong because >> there seems to be a subtle (and confusing) difference between >> `--pretty` and `--format`.

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Oops, I read about `--pretty` in pretty-formats.txt and didn't realize > that `--format` existed. However, your patch is still wrong because > there seems to be a subtle (and confusing) difference between > `--pretty` and `--format`. In the latter, you can't omit th

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Ram, > > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > >> 59893a88 (Documentation/log: add a CONFIGURATION section, 2010-05-08) >> mentioned that `format.pretty` is the default for the `--format` >> option. Such an option never existed, > > False. Have you tried it? Oop

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

Hi Ram, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > 59893a88 (Documentation/log: add a CONFIGURATION section, 2010-05-08) > mentioned that `format.pretty` is the default for the `--format` > option. Such an option never existed, False. Have you tried it? Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: s

[PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

59893a88 (Documentation/log: add a CONFIGURATION section, 2010-05-08) mentioned that `format.pretty` is the default for the `--format` option. Such an option never existed, and the author meant `--pretty`. Make this correction. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra --- Documentation/git-log.txt