Well You could star one of this issues:
-for Java
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4189
-for Flash
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4182
or You can submit Your own feature request.
Cheers,
D
On Dec 3, 7:40 am, Benjamin wrote:
> Hi there,
> I am
It would be a nice feature to have in our GWT arsenal so I submitted
an issue here:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4192
Please star it if You are interested.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" grou
This issue is not noise... Admin 500 responses and push failures really
scare me too.
I've just struggled with the same errors pushing out a release to a new
version.
=
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different
results.
Albert Einstein
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at
Dear reader,
I need some advise on the way to achieve this. My web application is
hosted on GAEJ. As users are using it, data are produced. These data
are stored inside the database, using jdo. I want too to write/update
some of these data inside a Google spreadsheet.
I saw the Google spreadshee
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Jan Stępień wrote:
> I've got a problem with an application developed in Clojure. When I
> run it locally using dev_appserver.sh everything works fine. However
> when I upload it I get a VerifyError during startup. Here's a
> respective snippet from logs: h
Hi,
You have to authenticate each of your users on GAEJ via UserService
using the Google login service and then you should be able to access
the Spreadsheets through this login.
See http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/users/overview.html
Do you use GWT for your front-end?
If yes, see
http
Hi,
Don't know if it is related to launch of 1.4.0 or not but it has
become very hard to deploy in the last 30 min.
Do you, guys, also experiment this?
regards
didier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to thi
Also minify and/or compress your XML!
On Dec 2, 5:06 am, pac wrote:
> That’s great then Stephen, appreciated the feedback. Thanks.
>
> On Dec 2, 1:44 am, Stephen Johnson wrote:
>
> > I believe Ikai's statement "The 30 second limit is imposed on the time it
> > takes the servlet to finish." is co
Do you mean - remove extra whitespaces, comments and other unneeded
characters without breaking the content structure?
On Dec 3, 1:06 pm, "jacek.ambroziak"
wrote:
> Also minify and/or compress your XML!
>
> On Dec 2, 5:06 am, pac wrote:
>
> > That’s great then Stephen, appreciated the feedback.
When will the Eclipse plugin update site be updated?
The plugin is now version 1.4, but the SDK is still version 1.3.8.
On Dec 3, 2:59 am, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
wrote:
> Dance dance robot is a bit older and the API may have changed slightly (not
> sure, I have not done a visual check), but it's a
Well, they just pushed version 1.4 and it may be that the sessions-enabled
flag wasn't enforced and now with version 1.4 perhaps it is. Sounds like you
may have to set the cookie yourself if you don't want to enable sessions for
some reason.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Ioan wrote:
> I still
Yes, this was a change we made in 1.4.0. If you have sessions
disabled, we no longer bother to set the jsessionid cookie, because it
was serving no purpose (at least within our own code).
Were you using jsessionid for something else? If so, I suggest either
enabling sessions or managing your own
My apologies. We plan to have it up before the end of the day today.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Royce Fullerton wrote:
> When will the Eclipse plugin update site be updated?
>
> The plugin is now version 1.4, but the SDK is still version 1.3.8.
>
> On Dec 3, 2:59 am, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
>
Would be very very nice
On Dec 3, 11:00 am, dilbert wrote:
> It would be a nice feature to have in our GWT arsenal so I submitted
> an issue here:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4192
>
> Please star it if You are interested.
--
You received this message because you
I have deployed a web service in gae but i need a WSDL file to
generate a cliente to use the service.
Where is the wsdl for the web service deployed ?
How does the app engine development server will recognise that a web
service is being deployed.
Please tell me some steps
--
You received this
Hi all,
I discovered a problem during coding Google WebToolkit together with
appengine and according to my interpretation of my tests it's the
appengine part of it, which causes the problem. or the development
server of it.
I tried to follow the article
http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/webtoolkit
According to the docs, creating memcache for an app is easy but where
do I store the "Cache" reference returned by the CacheFactory? Do I
store it in ServletContext as an attribute? or any other technique?
thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Go
This isn't noise. Thanks for reporting it to us. It's very helpful if you
post an issue and also post if it happens to be resolved. That way we're not
chasing down loose ends.
The admin console issues are something we are tracking. We address each
individual incident as they occur, but we're takin
> We haven't abandoned JDO/JPA, but we may emphasize the low-level APIs going
> forward. You'll always get low-level features first. The mismatch between
> datastore features and relational database features is starting to really
> grow.
I understand that emphasizing on the Low Level API makes sen
Indeed, would be very useful!
-g.
On Dec 3, 6:18 pm, Ice13ill wrote:
> Would be very very nice
>
> On Dec 3, 11:00 am, dilbert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > It would be a nice feature to have in our GWT arsenal so I submitted
> > an issue here:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/deta
You don't have to store the cache reference if you don't need to. It's just
a client, and the cost of instantiating it each time is minimal.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: ht
We'll investigate ways to keep JDO/JPA up to date.
I disagree about the fact that having community driven libraries is counter
productive. In fact, this is a sign of a thriving community. When evaluating
our support of these libraries, we realized that we could have done a better
job helping the f
In the meantime, you guys can check out what we did in Dance Dance Robot:
http://code.google.com/p/dance-dance-robot/
The code uses JSNI to integrate with the Channel API. It's pretty
straightfoward (maybe 20 lines of code tops):
http://code.google.com/p/dance-dance-robot/source/browse/#svn/trun
Here's the official code project:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-gae-channel/
It's currently identical (or pretty similar) to the code used in Dance,
Dance Robot, but we expect to be updating the project as needed.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleap
Wow. That was fast. Thanks Ikai.
On Dec 3, 8:00 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)"
wrote:
> Here's the official code project:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/gwt-gae-channel/
>
> It's currently identical (or pretty similar) to the code used in Dance,
> Dance Robot, but we expect to be updating the project as n
I don't know what jacek had in mind, but since it sounds like you're
making the request from a custom client, make sure you are making the
request with Accept-Encoding: gzip.
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/general.html#compression
Jeff
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:01 AM, pac wrote:
> Do you me
Does it take so much time to process your results that it really
matters they be done in the optimal order?
All that polling code is complicated... unless you're shaving off a
lot of real-world time, seems like it's better to just launch all
batches and block on the first one.
Jeff
On Wed, Dec 1
The channel api as part of the 1.4 SDK release doesnt seem to work
when running locally, the onmessage callback never gets called. All
works fine when deployed though. Is there anything I need to do to
get this working locally?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Clojure works, and the excellent appengine-magic library makes it much
easier to write code the way Lisp programmers are used to do.
https://github.com/gcv/appengine-magic
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to
Whoops my fault. I was testing some CSS changes at the same time and
forgot I was still in IE7. From FireFox it worked great locally.
On Dec 3, 7:34 pm, Rus wrote:
> The channel api as part of the 1.4 SDK release doesnt seem to work
> when running locally, the onmessage callback never gets call
It 's counter productive for me, for the simple reason that I cannot
choose which API to
use:
- JPA seems to be the standard but it's geared towards RDBMS
- JDO is 'older' but better supports non relational DBs
- Both of the above seem abandoned (for example they use a very old
Datanucleus version
That's a problem of your own creation. A multitude of choice is one of the
benefits of any Java platform. For instance, you mention that Objectify
seems great but may not be supported 1-2 years down the line. This is an
argument that you can apply to just about any open source library or
framework
hi,
Some of you may be interested in a book I co-authored that has just
been published:
"Google App Engine Java and GWT Application Development" by Amy Unruh
and Daniel Guermeur, from Packt.
The book describes many of the techniques and approaches used to
develop GAE+GWT applications, and include
> You're eager optimizing your support problem, when really the problem you
> should be solving is "what do I need to build? How do I get there?"
I know what I want to build. My problem is that I (obviously) need a
Datastore API. In the Google App Engine documentation
the endorsed API was (until n
Looks interesting, thanks for releasing!
A pdf/.mobi version would be a great addition btw...
regards,
-g.
On Dec 3, 1:02 am, "marius.andreiana"
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm glad to announce a free, online GWT 2.1 & GAE mini-book. It's
> available athttp://code.google.com/p/gwt-gae-book
>
>
Ok, fair enough, I'll continue posting if I experience new troubles ;)
Today, I've been able to deploy many times without any issue. I guess
the transient error reported by .../cloneblobs app is fixed.
As for the tasks, they did not stop working! When I refactored a piece
of code yesterday, I rem
On Dec 3, 11:47 pm, George Moschovitis
wrote:
> Looks interesting, thanks for releasing!
Glad I could give something back.
> A pdf/.mobi version would be a great addition btw...
If somebody wants to build these, I'll add them to downloads. However,
the online version has many links, which should
There's a big difference between something that is deprecated and something
that isn't getting any new features. JDO/JPA is most certainly not
deprecated. We are making sure it is keeping pace with our new SDK
releases, and we hope to be able to start enhancing it as soon as we can.
There is sti
GPE's AppEngine SDK bundle version 1.4.0 is now up. Sorry for the
delay.
On Dec 3, 11:02 am, Don Schwarz wrote:
> My apologies. We plan to have it up before the end of the day today.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Royce Fullerton wrote:
> > When will the Eclipse plugin update
I have just upgraded Eclipse Galileo with AppEngine version 1.4.0.
There seems to be a mismatch of Tomcat versions between pre-
compilation and execution.
Does anyone have a solution with jsp compilation issue?
Local server shows below logs with SDK 1.4.0 -
HTTP ERROR 500
Problem accessing /. Re
Sorry, no solution but a very similar issue with Eclipse Helios SR 1:
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP:
An error occurred at line: 9 in the generated java file
org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase cannot be resolved to a type
An error occurred at line: 10 in th
Is that another "wave" I see on the horizon ...
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ikai Lan (Google)
> wrote:
> That's a problem of your own creation. A multitude of choice is one of the
> benefits of any Java platform. For instance, you mention that Objectify
> seems great but may not be supported
42 matches
Mail list logo