Hi:
Thanks very much.
But I think we can use listener_full instead of limit_listener if we want
wake up the listener when there’s a connection closed. Like in the
beginning of listener_accept:
if (unlikely(l->nbconn >= l->maxconn)) {
listener_full(l);
return;
}
WHY not u
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:46:57PM +, Zhou,Qingzhi wrote:
> if (unlikely(actconn >= global.maxconn) && !(l->options & LI_O_UNLIMITED)) {
> limit_listener(l, &global_listener_queue);
> task_schedule(global_listener_queue_task, tick_add(now_ms, 1000)); /* try
> again in 1 second */
> return
Thanks David,
merged into 1.7 and 1.6.
Willy
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:52:21AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> I would slightly prefer if there was a more substantial comment in
> process_email_alert() noting that retry occurs 3 times.
Good point, I'll add this when merging.
> But regardless:
> Acked-by: Simon Horman
Thanks Simon!
Willy
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:11:53AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Pieter,
>
> > Hi Ben, Willy, Simon,
> >
> > Ben, thanks for the review.
> > Hoping 'release pressure' has cleared for Willy i'm resending the
> > patch now, with with your comments incorporated.
> >
> > CC, to Simon as maintain
Thank you for the information. The Root CA did indeed have a CRL. I added that
to my combined CRL, in the order local CRL, external root CRL, external
intermediate CRL and everything worked.
Thanks again,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Toft Alex (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION CENTRE
Hi Sylvain Faivre.
Am 09-11-2015 17:31, schrieb Sylvain Faivre:
Hi,
Sorry I'm late on this discussion, following this thread :
https://marc.info/?l=haproxy&m=143345620219498&w=2
We are using appsession with HAproxy 1.5 like this :
Thanks ;-)
backend http
appsession JSESSIONID len 24 ti
Hi Nenad,
Am 09-11-2015 22:52, schrieb Nenad Merdanovic:
Hello Aleksandar,
Okay after removing accept-proxy from
bind *:${HTTP_BIND_PORT} accept-proxy tfo
It comes what expected.
If you are using 'accept-proxy', HAproxy expects the payload to start
with a PROXY protocol header.
http://www
Hello Aleksandar,
> Okay after removing accept-proxy from
>
> bind *:${HTTP_BIND_PORT} accept-proxy tfo
>
> It comes what expected.
If you are using 'accept-proxy', HAproxy expects the payload to start
with a PROXY protocol header.
http://www.haproxy.org/download/1.6/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
Re
Am 09-11-2015 22:21, schrieb Willy Tarreau:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:15:46PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
...
epoll_wait(3, {}, 200, 1000)= 0
epoll_wait(3, {{EPOLLIN, {u32=5, u64=5}}}, 200, 1000) = 1
accept4(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(52310),
sin_addr=inet_a
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:15:46PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>
> ...
> epoll_wait(3, {}, 200, 1000)= 0
> epoll_wait(3, {{EPOLLIN, {u32=5, u64=5}}}, 200, 1000) = 1
> accept4(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(52310),
> sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, [16], SOCK_NONBLO
Am 09-11-2015 11:34, schrieb Willy Tarreau:
Hi Aleks,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 04:24:29PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hi.
Today I have tried to debug haproxy as in the old days ;-), I was not
able to see the communication on stderr.
I'm sure I have something missed in the past on the list
Hi,
Sorry I'm late on this discussion, following this thread :
https://marc.info/?l=haproxy&m=143345620219498&w=2
We are using appsession with HAproxy 1.5 like this :
backend http
appsession JSESSIONID len 24 timeout 1h request-learn
We would like to be able to do the same thing with HApro
Hi guys:
I’m reading the source code of version 1.6.2, in function listener_accept:
/* Note: if we fail to allocate a connection because of configured
* limits, we'll schedule a new attempt worst 1 second later in the
* worst case. If we fail due to system limits or temporary resource
* shortage,
Le 09/11/2015 11:39, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 09:55:39PM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an english mailing list!
> And I just checked, he is *not* subscribed to the list!
>
> Willy
>
>
Yup. I wouldn't be surprised if haproxy@formilux.org was used by bots as
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 09:55:39PM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an english mailing list!
And I just checked, he is *not* subscribed to the list!
Willy
Hi Aleks,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 04:24:29PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Today I have tried to debug haproxy as in the old days ;-), I was not
> able to see the communication on stderr.
>
> I'm sure I have something missed in the past on the list to be able to
> see the output.
I
Hi Pieter,
> Hi Ben, Willy, Simon,
>
> Ben, thanks for the review.
> Hoping 'release pressure' has cleared for Willy i'm resending the
> patch now, with with your comments incorporated.
>
> CC, to Simon as maintainer of mailers part so he can give approval (or
> not).
>
> The original reserva
Hi Pieter,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 04:44:18PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Hi List, Willy,
>
> Attached some small example fixes, spelling correction.
> Hope its ok like this :).
Applied, thanks!
Willy
19 matches
Mail list logo