f Of Kevin
Toppenberg
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 11:33 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
I just got around to searching for Paint.NET
I can't find it.
Can you post a URL?
Thanks
Kevin
--- David Sommers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I just got around to searching for Paint.NET
I can't find it.
Can you post a URL?
Thanks
Kevin
--- David Sommers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find that the most flexible license is one that
> doesn't exist - such
> as Public Domain.
>
> One of my favorite little programs is a Photoshop
> li
tent.
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Jim Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To:
> >Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:43 PM
> >Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
> >
> >>I don't understand why suddenly there
t;From: "Jim Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:43 PM
>Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
>
>
>>I don't understand why suddenly there is so much repetition on this list of
>>the mistaken
>> notion th
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy
Anthracite
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 9:07 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
I think there is a distinction being made between varieties of open
source. I
don&#x
ust thought I'd lob another grenade into the tent.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
>I don't understand why suddenly there is so much repetit
What I see are plans to release something or another (various patches
and enhancements? new modules? the whole thing?) under the name
"OpenVistA". That makes little sense, given that VistA was originally
built by VA employees long before WorldVistA or Hardhats.org even
existed. The GPL just doe
I think there is a distinction being made between varieties of open source. I
don't think anyone is trying to say that public domain isn't open source.
On Sunday 24 April 2005 08:43 pm, Jim Self wrote:
> I don't understand why suddenly there is so much repetition on this list of
> the mistaken
You are absolutely correct, I stand corrected.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Self
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 8:44 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA licensing.
I don't under
I don't understand why suddenly there is so much repetition on this list of the
mistaken
notion that software in the Public Domain is not Open Source. It is surely the
oldest form
of Open Source and has been accepted as such since the term "Open Source" was
originated.
It was explicitly added to
It's the process not the license that really mattersPublic Domain
could work just as well as an "open source" license in providing a
collaborative medium if improvements are made available to others via
public domainbut IMHO it is naive to expect this to happen given the
past 15+ years
I should add that we're discussing OpenVistA of course and not FOIA
VistA or any other name to replace OpenVistA as pointed out by Nancy.
Molly
Dr Molly Cheah wrote:
Ignacio,
The games, nay, the discussions started seriously in two other mailing
lists last year, Vista-vendors and Vista-open-sour
Ignacio,
The games, nay, the discussions started seriously in two other mailing
lists last year, Vista-vendors and Vista-open-source on yahoogroups.
That discussion fizzled out... simply because the decision making entity
isn't the discussants. Maury just reminded us of the existence of
vista-o
Exactly, it couldn't, but the install routines, the additional modules,
the documentation (non-VA) all of that could.
My little attempt at getting greek to work even though it isn't much
more than a hack and a hack explained to me by others could.
And that could aid other Greek or foreign language
I can understand how new modules (a.k.a packages) built on top of VistA
infrastructure could be licensed under GPL, but I cannot believe that
software obtained via FOIA could simply "declared" to be open source.
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 24, 2005, at 1:44 PM, Roy Gaber wrot
VistA is Public Domain, not Open Source, always has been, always (at least
should) will be.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ignacio
Valdes
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:38 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hardhats-me
16 matches
Mail list logo
