BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Central Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
Dear WG:
This email serves as a call for WG adoption of
draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req as a WG document. The call for
adoption will run for 2 weeks ending Oct 5, 2016.
The requirement document is one of the key deliverables specified by the I2NSF
charter.
Please note that this
The I2NSF WG has placed draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req in
state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Adrian Farrel)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req/
___
I2nsf
Hi Susan,
I deeply apology for not having read carefully the
draft-hares-i2nsf-ddos-yang-dm-00, but my understanding is that our
protocol would – for example – end up in agreeing using inter-cloud-ddos
NSF with the inter-cloud-ddos NETCONF/YANG model. The remaining
configuration NETCONF/YANG will
Hi Linda,
I apology for the delay. Please find my response and additional questions –
mostly for Susan ;-). If you are find with the response, I can also send
them on the ML.
Q1: There is no difference between SSF and NSF. We will change that in the
next version. Thanks for raising it, this