ly 12 companies to earn an A+ Rating by AM Best every
year since 1954!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of gsg
Sent: Fri 9/10/2010 5:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CA ESP Workload Automation
Does anyone use a CA job scheduler product calle
in England and Wales under company
registration number 1282495 with its registered office at the address
set out above. VAT number 697904179.
http://www.ca.com/
P please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to!
-Original Message-
From: gsg [mailto:gsg_...@yahoo.com]
Sent:
fax:1 613 562 5161
> mailto:NDuffee of uOttawa.ca http:/ /aix1.uottawa.ca/ ~nduffee
> "How *do* you plan for something like that?" Guardian Bob, Reboot
> "For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."
> "Systems Programming: Guilty,
something like that?" Guardian Bob, Reboot
"For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."
"Systems Programming: Guilty, until proven innocent" John Norgauer 2004
> -Original Message-----
> From: gsg [mailto:gsg...@yah..com]
> Sent: Septembe
5:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA ESP Workload Automation
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:37:04 -0500, gsg wrote:
>Does anyone use a CA job scheduler product called ESP Workload
Automation?
>
>PROS/CONS compared to
We have ESP, though I'm not all that familiar with it. If you wish you can
send me questions off list and I'd be glad to discuss with those in the know.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send ema
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:37:04 -0500, gsg wrote:
>Does anyone use a CA job scheduler product called ESP Workload
Automation?
>
>PROS/CONS compared to other job schedulers?
>
>TIA
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive a
Does anyone use a CA job scheduler product called ESP Workload Automation?
PROS/CONS compared to other job schedulers?
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu wit
8 matches
Mail list logo
