On Monday 22 May 2006 10:29, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> Both clients I use show deleted messages with a line through them, and
> neither one is Outlook. Why would you call this ridiculous? It's easy
> to undelete by highlighting one and clicking undelete. And it reminds
> me they're still taking up
On Monday 22 May 2006 10:45, you wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand why you think marking deleted messages is
> so bad. Have you never accidentally deleted the wrong message? Only
> to have it totally disappear, so you're not SURE what you deleted?
> I'd much rather have closer control over w
I'm not sure I understand why you think marking deleted messages is
so bad. Have you never accidentally deleted the wrong message? Only
to have it totally disappear, so you're not SURE what you deleted?
I'd much rather have closer control over what my mail program is
doing...
Jill William
--On Monday, May 22, 2006 10:13 -0600 Warren Turkal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way
you can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.
No. The default in
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:13:56AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
> > Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way you
> > can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.
>
> No. The default in Outlook wit
On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
> Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way you
> can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.
No. The default in Outlook with an IMAP account is that it just strikes out
the message in your messag
> hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 14:34 +0200 schrieb H. Wilmer:
>
>> > There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
>> > which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
>> > what you were after?
>
> however, thunderbird is not an option, cause o
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 14:34 +0200 schrieb H. Wilmer:
> > There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
> > which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
> > what you were after?
however, thunderbird is not an option, cause of missing ca
James Yale wrote:
There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
what you were after?
Well, I'm looking for something server-side, best would be something to
be run from cyrmaster, like squatter, to ex
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 09:35, James Yale wrote:
There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
what you were after?
Is this considered to be good UI design by anyone? Or,
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 09:35, James Yale wrote:
> There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
> which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
> what you were after?
Is this considered to be good UI design by anyone? Or, is IMAP support just
cripp
H. Wilmer wrote:
Denny Schierz wrote:
anybody found a way, to delete the messages, that has the delete flag,
or something else? Most ipurge examples needs a trash folder, but
Outlook does not move the messages to a trash like folder.
Ipurge seems to delete messages based on the specs you give
Denny Schierz wrote:
anybody found a way, to delete the messages, that has the delete flag,
or something else? Most ipurge examples needs a trash folder, but
Outlook does not move the messages to a trash like folder.
Ipurge seems to delete messages based on the specs you give it as
options ra
hi,
my Outlook users does not purge the mails, after delete them. Does
anybody found a way, to delete the messages, that has the delete flag,
or something else? Most ipurge examples needs a trash folder, but
Outlook does not move the messages to a trash like folder.
cu denny
--
Sicherheit verst
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 11:26 -0600, Karl Boyken wrote:
> We've been migrating our users from UW IMAP to Cyrus, and a few of our
> Outlook and Outlook Express users have been having a problem regarding
> deletion that they never had with UW IMAP. When they open a message up
> in a separate window
We've been migrating our users from UW IMAP to Cyrus, and a few of our
Outlook and Outlook Express users have been having a problem regarding
deletion that they never had with UW IMAP. When they open a message up
in a separate window, then close it, Outlook/Outlook Express marks the
message as
Bill Kearney wrote:
> I think outlook's utterly crappy handling of IMAP is a more powerful
> motivator. Outlook Express, on the other hand, does a fine job of
> supporting IMAP. But the regular "Outlook 2003" and past versions have had
> absolutely crappy IMAP handling. Such that it makes it alm
> Thunderbird seems to be
> configured by default to _move_ the message to the Deleted Items-folder
> and thus they vanish from whatever folder they were.
No they don't 'move'. They're simply marked as deleted, just as Outlook
does, but they remain in the original folder. Try it, delete one in t
18 matches
Mail list logo
