[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738893#action_12738893
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1769:
---
{quote}
bq. I only want to remove the call
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Why is "reversed" passed into SortField.getComparator(), and what does it
> mean?
> Should it always be passed as sortField.getReversed() (and if so, why
> does the param exist at all)?
reversed may be passed on to some comparators (currently
Remove unused "numSlotsFull" from FieldComparator.setNextReader
---
Key: LUCENE-1779
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1779
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738921#action_12738921
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1748:
Can you make the corresponding ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738922#action_12738922
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1763:
bq. Solr instantiates a MergePoli
Michael McCandless wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Why is "reversed" passed into SortField.getComparator(), and what does it mean?
Should it always be passed as sortField.getReversed() (and if so, why
does the param exist at all)?
reversed may be passed on t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12738926#action_12738926
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1763:
Yes I had to fix CreateIndexTask for that. We can
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> I should add them when I attached the patch. Sorry about that, Mike.
> If I have time when finishing work for fast vector highlighter,
> I'd like to contribute...
It's fine! We can iterate :)
And, really I should have asked for more javado
Welcome Robert!
Great to have you here!
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce that Robert Muir has accepted an
> invitation to join the Lucene community as a contrib committer. Robert has
> contributed a number of advances related to for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1778.
-
Resolution: Fixed
thanks shai!
> Add log.step support per task
> -
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> Why is "reversed" passed into SortField.getComparator(), and what does it
>> mean?
>> Should it always be passed as sortField.getReversed() (and if so, why
>> does the param exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1685.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
> Make the Highligh
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> OK, it sounds like it should always be the same as SortField.getReversed()
> then?
> In which case it seems redundant to pass it into
> SortField.getComparator() since SortField already keeps track of it?
Duh, right. I'll remove as an arg and
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> OK, it sounds like it should always be the same as SortField.getReversed()
>> then?
>> In which case it seems redundant to pass it into
>> SortField.getComparator() since SortFiel
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>> In fact I think SortField.getComparator should be package private?
>
> It would be nice to keep - Solr already uses it :-)
Intersting! OK I'll leave it public but put "subject to suddenly
change" warning on it.
Mike
--
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>
>>> In fact I think SortField.getComparator should be package private?
>>
>> It would be nice to keep - Solr already uses it :-)
>
> Intersting! OK I'll leave it public but put "s
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Michael
> McCandless wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Yonik Seeley
>> wrote:
>>
In fact I think SortField.getComparator should be package private?
>>>
>>> It would be nice to keep - Solr already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739017#action_12739017
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
Okay - my first time messing with the back comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739019#action_12739019
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1767:
-
Anyone have anything to add or any committer wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1779:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1779.patch
Attached patch:
* Spruces up javadocs for FieldComp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739021#action_12739021
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1763:
-
Thanks guys - we can fix this in Solr no proble
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739023#action_12739023
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1779:
--
+1
Thanks Mike, much improved!
FieldComparat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739028#action_12739028
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1779:
bq. FieldComparator.sortType() is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1779:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1779.patch
New patch, removing FieldComparator.sortType().
> Rem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1504.
Resolution: Fixed
And then, there were 8!
> Contrib-Spatial should use DocSet API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739080#action_12739080
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1749:
bq. Right - that code was well te
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> This time I loaded up 1.3 million wikipedia articles, gave the test 768MB of
> RAM, warmed the Searcher with lots of searching before each measurement, and
> compared 1 segment vs 5. The optimized index was 15-20% faster with the
> queries I was
OK I will open an issue to further iterate on this...
Mike
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Adriano
Crestani wrote:
> The "original" and "helper" aren't that descriptive to users.
>
> It's named "helper" because it extends QueryParserHelper, that's the only
> reason. I think it's ok to rename "ori
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739089#action_12739089
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1749:
--
{quote}
How about, for queries that need to g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739092#action_12739092
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1749:
--
General Comments on mark's latest patch...
* the chan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739093#action_12739093
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1749:
--
bq. Hoss/Mark do you want to fold it in to the patch,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739097#action_12739097
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1749:
-
bq. Mark: would you mind splitting up the lates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739098#action_12739098
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1749:
--
bq. Asking the searcher for the docFreq is th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739104#action_12739104
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
Thanks Hugh!
> getPayloadSpans on org.apache.l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1748.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
(was: 3.0)
Luce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739106#action_12739106
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
Unless there is an objection, and after another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739108#action_12739108
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1749:
-
bq. is it a bug that AverageGuessMemoryModel.ge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739122#action_12739122
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1749:
{quote}
bq. Hoss/Mark do you want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739120#action_12739120
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1749:
{quote}
Asking the searcher for t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739124#action_12739124
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1771:
I think we should change the appr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739126#action_12739126
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
okay, sounds good
> Using explain may double r
deprecate Scorer.explain
Key: LUCENE-1780
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1780
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Assignee: Michael M
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739130#action_12739130
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
searcher doesn't have access to numDocs (termqu
Hi Uwe,
The junit TestSpanQueryParserSimpleSample is a testcase that uses the
OriginalSyntaxParser to parse
the text, and it uses a SpansValidatorQueryNodeProcessor,
UniqueFieldQueryNodeProcessor and a
SpanOrQueryNodeBuilder to create a lucene SpanTermQuery.
I think is a good initial example
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739130#action_12739130
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1771 at 8/4/09 1:16 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739132#action_12739132
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1771:
--
bq. searcher doesn't have access to numDocs (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739135#action_12739135
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
bq. Actually, since QueryWeight is new in 2.9,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1773.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Thanks Koji!
> Add benchmark task for
Hi Mike,
If so, maybe we should rename "OriginalQueryParserHelper" to
"DefaultQueryParser" and perhaps move it up into oal.queryParser?
I rather not have any specific implementation code to be placed outside its
package. In future we will probably have a ComplexPhraseQueryParserHelper
when the ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739137#action_12739137
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1771:
--
bq. Good... cause it's a bug and it shouldn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739138#action_12739138
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1771:
--
bq. We do have to be back compat with Weight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739145#action_12739145
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
CustomScoreQuery has no access to the top level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1780.
Resolution: Fixed
> deprecate Scorer.explain
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739148#action_12739148
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
bq. QueryWeight doesn't need a explain(IndexRea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739154#action_12739154
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1771:
--
bq. Why not? QueryWeight implements Weight f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739160#action_12739160
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
Yes - but then I think we have to use the top r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739163#action_12739163
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1749:
--
bq. Does Solr ever rely on Lucene's "implemen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739166#action_12739166
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
bq. This way individual queries are not respons
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739173#action_12739173
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1771:
--
bq. .. so who is? (responsible for resolving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739182#action_12739182
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
bq. which brings up another point... isn't a ba
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739182#action_12739182
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1771 at 8/4/09 2:31 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739194#action_12739194
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
Ignore my previous comment - was missing the In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1771:
Attachment: LUCENE-1771.patch
Exploratory test patch
> Using explain may double ram reqs for fiel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1771:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1771.patch)
> Using explain may double ram reqs for fieldcaches when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1771:
Attachment: LUCENE-1771.patch
whoops - don't need to sub reader break out in boolean query
> Usin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1771:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1771.patch)
> Using explain may double ram reqs for fieldcaches when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1771:
Attachment: LUCENE-1771.patch
> Using explain may double ram reqs for fieldcaches when using
> Va
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1771:
Attachment: LUCENE-1771.patch
> Using explain may double ram reqs for fieldcaches when using
> Va
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739203#action_12739203
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
Okay - here is patch that should be good enough
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739208#action_12739208
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
Too continue my JIRA spam on this issue:
So th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739214#action_12739214
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1758:
-
if there are no objections to this one I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739216#action_12739216
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1771:
{quote}
bq. searcher doesn't have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739218#action_12739218
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1771:
bq. isn't a back-compat break too
curious how people feel about folding the contrib/benchmark CHANGES
into the contrib CHANGES?
--
Robert Muir
rcm...@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739222#action_12739222
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
Ah right - the wrapper call is on Searcher - tr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739226#action_12739226
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1771:
-
Also the doc passed to explain from IndexSearch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739235#action_12739235
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-1773:
Thanks Mike! One thing I forgot to mentio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739235#action_12739235
]
Koji Sekiguchi edited comment on LUCENE-1773 at 8/4/09 4:15 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1771:
Attachment: LUCENE-1771.patch
with doc debase and top level reader to for weight explain
> Using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739235#action_12739235
]
Koji Sekiguchi edited comment on LUCENE-1773 at 8/4/09 4:17 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739235#action_12739235
]
Koji Sekiguchi edited comment on LUCENE-1773 at 8/4/09 4:16 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1770:
Attachment: LUCENE-1770.patch
changes name to EnWikiQueryMaker
updates javadoc a bit - removes ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739242#action_12739242
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1758:
-
Its not released, but Arabic Analyzer has been
Large distances in Spatial go beyond Prime MEridian
---
Key: LUCENE-1781
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: cont
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: LLRect.java
Fixed code - needs to be put in a release (trunk)
> Large distances in Spatia
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1758:
Attachment: LUCENE-1758.patch
add note under Changes in Runtime Behavior warning any existing user
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-1770:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1770.patch
bq. changes name to EnWikiQueryMaker
changes name to EnWikiQ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1781:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Large distances in Spatial go beyond Prime MEri
Robert Muir wrote:
curious how people feel about folding the contrib/benchmark CHANGES
into the contrib CHANGES?
+1. At the least, lets not follow that model anymore, unless we decide
each contrib should get its own Change file. As a user, I want things to
be nice and easy - check core Chan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-1773:
> Add benchmark task for FastVectorHighlighter
> -
Rename OriginalQueryParserHelper
Key: LUCENE-1782
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1782
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib/*
Affects Versions: 2.
: I wonder: if we run an "svn commit . tags/lucene_2_4.../src" whether
: svn will do this as a single transaction? Because "." (the trunk
: checkout) and tags/lucene_2_4... are two separate svn checkouts. (I
: haven't tested). If it does, then I think this approach is cleanest?
you can't have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1770:
Summary: EnwikiQueryMaker (was: WikipediaQueryMaker)
whoops - that W should be lowercase - Enwiki
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1781:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1781.patch
I was able to get TestCartesian to hit the issue, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739298#action_12739298
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1771:
--
bq. I'm confused... why is that a bug?
Becau
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1770.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
> EnwikiQueryMaker
>
>
>
Benchmark highlights with older QueryTermScorer rather than the default
QueryScorer.
Key: LUCENE-1783
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1783
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reopened LUCENE-1685:
-
> Make the Highlighter use SpanScorer by default
> --
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739318#action_12739318
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1773:
-
I think the Highlighter tests might be messed u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12739319#action_12739319
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1685:
-
I reopened this because I saw that changing ben
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
