Dan G. Switzer, II wrote:
Saying "div#car" is literally saying find me all "div" tags, where
the "id"
is "car". To do that, we have to first get find all DIV tags and
then
figure
out which one has an id of "car".
That's the way it worked pre 1.1. Now, it's "get #car a
On 6/12/07, Chris W. Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
What's the standard method for fitting an existing site with AJAX
functionality?
Currently all my server side files that process requests, like deleting
rows from a database (e.g. customers, products, etc.), automatically
redirect
Wow Jtip was great but cluetip takes it to another level. sticky ajax
tooltips cool. Great job Karl.
On Jun 12, 4:14 pm, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, that's cool!
>
> They feature clueTip, too, and I haven't even blogged about it yet.
> Not sure how they found out about it, but
On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Dan G. Switzer, II wrote:
If you run this example, the has a yellow background and
the
has a pink background.
However, only the get it's text appended to it. You can
work around
it by doing:
$("[EMAIL PROTECTED]'bam']").append(" -- pink");
yep. that's
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:14 PM, Benjamin Sterling wrote:
By the way, does anyone know which page the slickspeed test is run
on ( http://mootools.net/slickspeed/) ? I can't find any of the
actual elements on the page itself.
Not sure if I understand your question correctly, but they are
On 6/12/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This just isn't exactly intuitive and can be confusing to people who'd
expect a valid CSS selector rule to work in jQuery.
Except that, while the selectors are syntactically valid, you can't have
duplicate IDs on the same page, so you'
>Yes, getElementById returns the first one found, i.e. the first one in the
>dom, if there are multiple nodes with the same id.
The fact that jQuery looks for the id first, then the tag definitely
improves performance, but causes the following example to fail:
$(document).ready(
functio
>But that is my thinking of why $('span#bam') would be faster then just
>$('bam').
But getting an element by ID is much faster--because there's a native method
of retrieval.
You're either selecting all tags and then looking to see which has
an ID of "bam", or your finding the first instance of
I guess that's one more thing to prompt it's finish :-)
It's looking good.
On Jun 12, 4:14 pm, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, that's cool!
>
> They feature clueTip, too, and I haven't even blogged about it yet.
> Not sure how they found out about it, but I feel kind of pathetic
I'd like to get this feature set stable and to a 1.0 release. Once
I'm there I'll venture into the optional masks. I haven't exactly
settled everything in my head on how to implement that just yet.
Josh
On Jun 12, 8:04 pm, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Awesome.
> We just launched t
That is an interesting idea.
Here's one possible way of handling it. On document ready, set a timer for
a specified amount of time, that will search for each img on the page and
check to see if they are loaded and alter the url as needed. I don't know
the best way to test for an image being loa
I've done both, and there are plusses and minuses to each one.
Currently, my preferred method (using .NET) is a single page that handles
everything. I have an IHttpHandler set up to intercept all calls to
Coral.ashx, process the request and return a JSON-formatted response. This
is also where
I've been looking through this jQuery and we're going to introduce
some of the functionality in a site we run. it's a free site that
displays referrer lists.
My question is this. Is there a plugin or extension already written
that can gather data either directly or from a database (MySQL) that
wi
Awesome.
We just launched the e-commerce side of things and used the plugin in a few
places.
http://app.marketo.com/signup/signup/code/standard
Notice phone and zip.
One thing I would love to see is an option to -not- delete the contents if
they miss the last digit on blur.
For instance, I'd like
Yes, getElementById returns the first one found, i.e. the first one in the
dom, if there are multiple nodes with the same id.
On 6/12/07, Aaron Heimlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/12/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Plus, what happens if you have:
>
>
>
>
>
> What if
I'm proud to announce the second beta of my Masked Input Plugin for
jQuery. This release fixes a few bugs from Beta 1 and adds a few
features.
The following is a list of changes for this release.
* BREAKING CHANGE: If you were using the optional placeholder
argument, you will need to change it t
On 6/12/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Plus, what happens if you have:
What if you need to retrieve the span tag? If it's checking #bam first,
won't it only find the element?
The DOM2 has this to say:
getElementById introduced in DOM Level 2
Returns the Element
What if you need to retrieve the span tag? If it's checking #bam first,
won't it only find the element?
But that is my thinking of why $('span#bam') would be faster then just
$('bam').
(And yes, I know the HTML spec says that IDs should be unique, but
occasionally you're dealing w/dynam
> Saying "div#car" is literally saying find me all "div" tags, where
>the "id"
> is "car". To do that, we have to first get find all DIV tags and
then
>figure
> out which one has an id of "car".
>
>
>That's the way it worked pre 1.1. Now, it's "get #car and check if it's a
>div".
On Jun 11, 7:30 pm, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jQuery always returns a jQuery object, regardless of whether it finds
> anything or not. To see if anything has been selected, use last.length or
> last.size() being greater than 0. This is by design so chaining won't break
> if noth
Karl,
By the way, does anyone know which page the slickspeed test is run on (
http://mootools.net/slickspeed/) ? I can't find any of the actual
elements on the page itself.
Not sure if I understand your question correctly, but they are using iframes
for each framework.
... I do think, howev
Chris,
If you want to keep your site unobtrusive, then option 2 would be better.
Just pass an extra param, whether it is a POST or a GET, and have the
serverside page keep a look out for that param. This of course is assuming
that your current set up is something like: formpage -> processpage
->
clueTip rules !!
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Karl Swedberg
Sent: mercredi 13 juin 2007 0:14
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jTip and ToolTip featured on smashing magazine
Hey, that's cool!
They feature clueTip, too, a
The beta does replace the webkit framework in OSX, so everything relying
on that will be using the v3 libraries (mail etc).
You might be better getting one of the webkit nightly builds (maybe
somebody knows which revision corresponds to the beta?) which contain
the webkit framework within the a
Hello,
What's the standard method for fitting an existing site with AJAX
functionality?
Currently all my server side files that process requests, like deleting
rows from a database (e.g. customers, products, etc.), automatically
redirect the user to another page with a status message (e.g.
succ
Oh yeah. thanks a lot for pointing that out, Aaron.
By the way, does anyone know which page the slickspeed test is run on
(http://mootools.net/slickspeed/) ? I can't find any of the actual
elements on the page itself.
It's funny, though, that from the looks of the window.selectors array
[
Hey, that's cool!
They feature clueTip, too, and I haven't even blogged about it yet.
Not sure how they found out about it, but I feel kind of pathetic to
be "scooped" by someone about my own plug-in. Pathetic, but also
flattered.
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.c
On 6/12/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It has a link to a speed test I threw together, and also to Aaron's
enhancement.
Just so nobody's confused, Karl's link[1] and my Firebug-enhanced speed
test[2] both deal with jQuery 1.0, not 1.1. I have yet to upgrade my
Firebug-enhanced t
Try this:
/^(?:\d+|\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})+)(?:\.\d+)?$/
Tests:
/^(?:\d+|\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})+)(?:\.\d+)?$/.test("10");
true
/^(?:\d+|\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})+)(?:\.\d+)?$/.test("10.1");
true
/^(?:\d+|\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})+)(?:\.\d+)?$/.test("100.1");
true
/^(?:\d+|\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})+)(?:\.\d+)?$/.test("1
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/06/12/tooltips-scripts-ajax-javascript-css-dhtml/
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://www.KenzoMedia.com
http://www.KenzoHosting.com
I think maybe he was referring to this one:
http://www.learningjquery.com/2006/12/quick-tip-optimizing-dom-traversal
As someone else already mentioned, the part about how it finds
something like $('div#foo') is no longer true (as of 1.1), but the
general principles are still relevant, I think
On 6/12/07, Benjamin Sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(I thought it was on learningjquery.com, but could not find it) an article
a couple months back.
Could you be thinking of
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com/javascript/jquery-11-selector-speeds (server
seems to be a bit funky today, so watch
the benefit of using this plugin is to keep the chain, using chainable
events instead of dropping into each loops.
On 6/12/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
> a new, and I think very useful function, match()
I find that last one quite interesting:
I through that rat
That is what I thought, especially after reading (I thought it was on
learningjquery.com, but could not find it) an article a couple months back.
Maybe someone can put together a "Best Practices" article.
That's the way it worked pre 1.1. Now, it's "get #car and check if it's a
div".
--
Benj
Hi Sean,
1) Lots of people take speed tests seriously, even if they're not a
good way to judge a libraries use.
Absolutely true Sean.
2) Making jQuery faster doesn't mean it has to be bigger in size, only
more clever.
Actually that's not 100% true. As Klaus mentioned, there are boundaries
On 6/12/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Saying "div#car" is literally saying find me all "div" tags, where the
"id"
is "car". To do that, we have to first get find all DIV tags and then
figure
out which one has an id of "car".
That's the way it worked pre 1.1. Now, it's "get
> You have to rebind the clicks after the ajax loads:
Thank you 1K Sean for and Andy, I've learned something new
--
Massimiliano Marini - http://www.linuxtime.it/massimilianomarini/
"It's easier to invent the future than to predict it." -- Alan Kay
What about something like this:
"100.12".match(/\d+(?:\.\d+)?/)
HTH,
Matt
On 6/12/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
has anybody some regular expressions at hand that work in JS to match
decimal numbers, eg. 100, 100.4 or 100,120.124
Thanks for sharing.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
h
You have to rebind the clicks after the ajax loads:
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: "news.php",
success: function(msg){
$("#response").fadeIn("slow").html(msg);
$("#response a").click(function(){
alert("Hello");
return false;
)};
}
});
~Sean
> Well, it depends. When you say that the content is generated
> dynamically, are you saying that it's generated by a server side
> language like ColdFusion or PHP?
I think this case, this is my code:
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: "news.php",
success: function(msg){
$("#response").
Really? hmmm... guess there a some code a need to change.
A much more efficient method is just using "#car"--which says go get me the
element who's ID is "car". The browser has a native method for getting
this
and this is very fast an efficient.
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://www.KenzoMedia.
Hi,
has anybody some regular expressions at hand that work in JS to match
decimal numbers, eg. 100, 100.4 or 100,120.124
Thanks for sharing.
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
Well, it depends. When you say that the content is generated dynamically,
are you saying that it's generated by a server side language like ColdFusion
or PHP? Or is it being generated by Javascript? If it's created by
javascript, after the page is loaded, then you'll need to reassign the click
han
Benjamin,
>>I switched to a different methodology and it sped up
>
>Can you explain what you did? I try to give a full path to an item, ie:
>
>
>
>
>
>$('div#car div.part')
>
>This may be off topic a bit, but I do believe we should educate people on
>the fastest way to select an object.
Mor
> Your code is saying an A tag that has an id of response. To get a
> jQuery object containing all a tags inside that div, it should look
> like this:
>
> #response a
I have corrected as you have said, but still not work, this is the
correction I have applied:
$("#response a").click(function(){
Thanks for the pointer.
I've ended up using createElementNS, but it's hard to use when you're
used to the concise syntax of jQuery ;-)
What would be the best way to append a document fragment - retrieved
with $.ajax() or $.get() - into an existing , knowing that the
server replies to the xmlhttp
>One bad Apple spoils the bunch.
I think there's a Donnie Osmond joke in there somewhere...
Josh,
>Actually, there currently isn't a programmatic way to set the value
>and have it be masked automagically for the developer. I just wanted
>to see if I could hook into existing methods to keep from having to
>add too much syntax. It's driven off of focus,blur,keypress and
>pasting(on cert
You can wrap that code in an if statement looking for ie6.
On 6/12/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To make the issue below more clear, I've posted an example of the issue:
>
>http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/jquery/ie6_form_fragment_bug.htm
>
>If you run this code in FF or
I switched to a different methodology and it sped up
Can you explain what you did? I try to give a full path to an item, ie:
$('div#car div.part')
This may be off topic a bit, but I do believe we should educate people on
the fastest way to select an object.
--
Benjamin Sterling
http:/
Your code is saying an A tag that has an id of response. To get a jQuery
object containing all a tags inside that div, it should look like this:
#response a
That says "any A tag inside a container with an id of response".
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAI
$(document).ready(function(){
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: "news.php",
success: function(msg){
$("#response").fadeIn("slow").html(msg);
}
});
$("a#response").click(function(){
alert("Hello");
return false;
});
});
in "response" appear the data fro
Someone should let them know...that's just assinine.
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:26 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: SlickSpeed CSS Selector TestSuite
Ok, Apple engineers are s
Ok, Apple engineers are seriously "a few kilobytes short of meg".
Check out the file size of http://www.apple.com/itunes/
Compressed its 878k. But look why. They are using the uncompressed,
unminified, totally commented versions of prototype and scriptaculous.
Nothing is minified, much less pack
Actually, there currently isn't a programmatic way to set the value
and have it be masked automagically for the developer. I just wanted
to see if I could hook into existing methods to keep from having to
add too much syntax. It's driven off of focus,blur,keypress and
pasting(on certain browsers
Sean Catchpole wrote:
I hear a lot of discussion about how jQuery isn't that slow, the test
wasn't perfectly fair (what test is?), that keeping code small is
important, and that development time is the most important thing.
1) Lots of people take speed tests seriously, even if they're not a
>That's kind of what I was thinking. I was hoping that their might be
>a better way.
I'd advise against doing that by default. I suppose you could add it as
config option for those users that might not have any control over how the
field is being updated.
I would think that would be exception
That's kind of what I was thinking. I was hoping that their might be
a better way.
On Jun 12, 3:43 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Josh,
>
> >My goal was to detect a val() call from within my masked input plugin.
>
> >So, when someone says "$("#id").maskedinput('(999) 999-9
Josh,
>My goal was to detect a val() call from within my masked input plugin.
>
>So, when someone says "$("#id").maskedinput('(999) 999-')" , I
>would love to be able to detect when that value had been set
>programatically and then re-check the masking.
The only way I know to do that, would
Dan G. Switzer, II wrote:
Josh,
One more quick thing, is it possible to attach this to the val() of a
single input, or am I limited to extending this globally?
Instead of calling the below method "val" call it something else--like
"valChange()" or something. Then just call that new method an
My goal was to detect a val() call from within my masked input plugin.
So, when someone says "$("#id").maskedinput('(999) 999-')" , I
would love to be able to detect when that value had been set
programatically and then re-check the masking.
So, if someone does a "$("#id").val('555-867-5309'
http://www.quirksmode.org/bugreports/archives/2004/11/innerhtml_in_xh.html
Josh,
>One more quick thing, is it possible to attach this to the val() of a
>single input, or am I limited to extending this globally?
Instead of calling the below method "val" call it something else--like
"valChange()" or something. Then just call that new method any time you want
the change e
>Thank you. Any idea how I could attach to regular javascript call like
>" x.value='something' "?
You're not going to be able to do that in any kind of cross-browser way.
Just use a jQuery method/plug-in.
-Dan
What I'd like to do is host my images remotely, but only if the remote
host is able to return my images in a short amount of time. Can
jQuery be used to start a timer when the page is first hit and if
certain images are not loaded in X amount of seconds, then use a
different url for the images?
On 6/9/07, Jose Manuel Zea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I´m still trying to fix this.
...
So the thing is that when I set the attribute src of the image after
the page is loaded, in IE6 doesn´t work if the image is not in the
cache.
Please help!! I don´t know how to explain this to my client.
it totaly agree. And about the Dimensions plugin: a lot of other
plugins use their own (not so good) implementation of the
functionality the Dimensions plugin provide.
On 12 jun, 20:22, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Things I would vote to increase the base size with:
>
>1. Dimensi
Sean Catchpole wrote:
2) Making jQuery faster doesn't mean it has to be bigger in size, only
more clever.
Well, at some point there are boundaries and it has to become bigger.
For example if using native XPath support in certain browsers is the
only way to speed it up.
--Klaus
Excellent! And yes, chaining is great.
I had tried chaining with append, but I now realize why that wasn't
working (it was putting HTML into font-container and not subdiv).
This combined with Franck's last example give me exactly what I need.
Brad
On Jun 12, 1:44 pm, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I hear a lot of discussion about how jQuery isn't that slow, the test
wasn't perfectly fair (what test is?), that keeping code small is
important, and that development time is the most important thing.
1) Lots of people take speed tests seriously, even if they're not a
good way to judge a librar
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
a new, and I think very useful function, match()
I find that last one quite interesting:
|$("#showScript").toggle(
function(){$("script:last").clone().textNodes().wrap("").parent().appendTo("body")}
,function(){$("code").remove()}
);
|
Could you explain a bit what
One more quick thing, is it possible to attach this to the val() of a
single input, or am I limited to extending this globally?
On Jun 12, 2:44 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Josh,
>
> >I was just wondering, should a val() call invoke a change event? If
> >not, is there a
Thank you. Any idea how I could attach to regular javascript call like
" x.value='something' "?
On Jun 12, 2:44 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Josh,
>
> >I was just wondering, should a val() call invoke a change event? If
> >not, is there a good way to emulate this behavio
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
Hi there,
I'm putting together an editable combobox using the twice modified
autocomplete plugin (Dylan Verhuel's I think). I start with a dropdown
and a text input, then create an array from the s values. I
replace the static HTML with a single text input followed
Fabien Meghazi wrote:
Maybe what I want to do is pointless or too complicated.
I'm curious to know how do you manage double client/server side
validation in your applications ?
No, its no pointless at all. Its a very important issue, something I'd
like to deal with on a more long term issue. So
Try this...
$('').appendTo("#font-container").html("Lorem
ipsum ...")
Isn't chaining great?!
George
On Jun 12, 8:21 pm, Brad Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Franck!
>
> I had something working but that is more compact.
>
> Since I will need to place content into the inserted div I
Josh,
>I was just wondering, should a val() call invoke a change event? If
>not, is there a good way to emulate this behavior.
You could overwrite the default behavior:
$.fn.extend({
val: function( val ) {
return val == undefined ?
( this.length
On 12 juin, 21:21, Brad Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> var c = $("#font-container");
> c.append('');
> c.children("div:last-child").html("Lorem ipsum ..."); // get
> the last inserted div
>
You could use an id and increment it each time you insert a child and
then use this id directly.
Som
Someone once said to me "this will be a moot point by 2008" - but I
totally disagreed with them. Yes countries like the UK, USA, Canada
and Japan may have > 80% coverage and > 50% subscription rates, but in
these countries as you say there are still a large proportion of users
on dialup.
Many p
I was just wondering, should a val() call invoke a change event? If
not, is there a good way to emulate this behavior.
Thanks
Josh
digitalbush.com
Diego A. wrote:
Keep in mind I don't using TinyMCE, I use FCKEditor, but the principle
should be the same...
Basically, I write a small plugin that is responsible for
1. Creating an instance of the editor
2. Retrieving the HTML content from the editor and 'preparing' it for
form submission
For
a new, and I think very useful function, match()
as in
.match(/\d+/g).wrap("").end()
gives italicized digits
or
.match(/\b[A-Z]\w*\b/g).wrap('')
italicizes words that start with a cap
All happening in place in the dom.
get it: http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/plugins/textNodes/
see
Thanks Franck!
I had something working but that is more compact.
Since I will need to place content into the inserted div I need to
select the last inserted div. Using your suggestion, I've come up with
something like:
var c = $("#font-container");
c.append('');
c.children("div:last-child").htm
Hi there,
I'm putting together an editable combobox using the twice modified
autocomplete plugin (Dylan Verhuel's I think). I start with a dropdown
and a text input, then create an array from the s values. I
replace the static HTML with a single text input followed by a link that
I want t
Hi Marshall,
thank you _very_ much, it works like a charme!
Best regards
Arne
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marshall Salinger
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 6:05 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Possible to intercept ent
>To make the issue below more clear, I've posted an example of the issue:
>
>http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/jquery/ie6_form_fragment_bug.htm
>
>If you run this code in FF or IE7, the checkbox will be checked. However,
>in
>IE6 the checkbox is not checked--even though as you can see the DOM
>fr
Take a look at http://RSProjectManager.com
Not jQuery but new project management portal
Randy
On Jun 11, 11:26 am, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Michael Stuhr wrote:
>
> > Rey Bango schrieb:
> >> Yep. It looks very similar. The good thing about it, though, is that
> >> its lev
This should work:
$('#form_containter').append('');
then
$('#form_containter').append('');
and so on...
Franck.
On 12 juin, 18:39, Brad Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In looking at the DOM manipulation commands I'm not clear on the best
> way to insert a div into an existing div. More sp
>That is what I was getting ready to say myself, I replaced your function
>with:
>
>
>function (){
>this.checked = true;
>$("body").append(oDom.html ());
>}
>
>and it returns the "checked" box, and looking at the textarea and
Dan,
That is what I was getting ready to say myself, I replaced your function
with:
function (){
this.checked = true;
$("body").append(oDom.html());
}
and it returns the "checked" box, and looking at the textarea and seeing
tha
Things I would vote to increase the base size with:
1. Dimensions http://jquery.com/plugins/project/dimensions (13k
uncompressed / 3 packed)
2. More selectors:
http://www.softwareunity.com/sandbox/JQueryMoreSelectors/ (12k
uncompressed / ? packed)
3. Speed Improvements (Up to 10k addi
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I would guess that most (at least a large percentage) of their target
> audience has broadband.
Last weekend I was over a friends house with dial-up and I was amazed at
how completely unusable the web was for me...
Also, if you move the each() line after it's append to the document, the
checkbox does get checked in IE6.
-Dan
>-Original Message-
>From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Dan G. Switzer, II
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2:18 PM
>To: jquery-en@googlegrou
To make the issue below more clear, I've posted an example of the issue:
http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/jquery/ie6_form_fragment_bug.htm
If you run this code in FF or IE7, the checkbox will be checked. However, in
IE6 the checkbox is not checked--even though as you can see the DOM fragment
t
On 6/12/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This topic comes up every time a speed test emerges. To me, speed is
totally irrelevant in most circumstances that I use jQuery.
It does, and it is. That was why I tried to open the consideration out a bit
further to the eventuality of someth
Rey Bango wrote on 6/12/2007 7:25 AM:
So at the end of the day, it comes down to this:
- We can increase selector speeds at the expense of file size
or
- We can continue to focus on providing tight code in a small package
and take what is arguably a small hit in speed
Since most browsers
Would it be possible to create an "Overdrive" plugin that would speed things
up? If you are using normal queries, you could use the base version of
jquery. If you are in a special situation, querying a huge number of things
or special queries that take a long time, simply include the "Overdrive"
p
A lot is being made of how small jQ is. From the quick check I did, jQ
compressed is 5k smaller than Prototype, and MooTools with a quick selection of
the functions that seem to be in jQ was 27k, only 10k more than jQ. Considering
the library is typically downloaded once and then cached, 5-10k
I would guess that most (at least a large percentage) of their target
audience has broadband.
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert O'Rourke
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:56 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery]
Andy Matthews wrote:
Well said. That about sums it up for me.
Yes, I agree as well. The problem is that probably still people will
draw the wrong conclusions from such tests. I have the feeling that
library makers just use these tests to get draw attention. Thus its even
more important to s
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
