On Saturday 01 October 2011 00:12:05 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 10:07:27 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > will say "Platform 4.7, Plasma
> > Workspaces 4.8 and application updates" (or something along those lines).
> > that was not just a marketing ploy, but an atte
forgot to add kcd
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: "gamer" mouse button shortcuts (LONG)
Date: Saturday 01 October 2011, 08:19:47
From: Martin Gräßlin
To: Kwin, NET API, kwin styles API, kwin modules API
On Friday 30 September 2011 15:14:10 Rick Stockton wrote:
> I've been
I've been inspired by the 'shortcut doc' Thread on kwin ML. This
concerns mouse devices with "extra" buttons driving our desktop, and
creating mouse-based shortcuts.
< SAD STORY>
You may recall that, many months ago, I was encouraged to try a Qt
enhancement for this. Qt consumes X11 ButtonPres
Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 10:07:27 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> will say "Platform 4.7, Plasma
> Workspaces 4.8 and application updates" (or something along those lines).
> that was not just a marketing ploy, but an attempt to align our public
> communication with the realities that already ex
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure:
> of course this is for the frameworks thingi.
Oh, sorry for the misinterpretation.
Albert
>
> On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >> A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, S
of course this is for the frameworks thingi.
On 09/30/2011 07:09 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure:
>>> Hi lists,
>>>
>>> with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that
>>> direc
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Alexander Neundorf vàreu escriure:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 29, 2011 21:43:34 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> > > Without judging on the other arguments which look very reasonable to
> > > me...
> > > On Thu, Sep
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Aaron J. Seigo vàreu escriure:
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 23:57:56 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102175/
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102291/
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102350/
>
> none of these are critica
A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure:
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:47:55 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> ...
>
> > That is actually Dirk's plan (or at least that is what i remember from
> > the Release Team BoF in Berlin).
>
> ...
>
> Are the results of this BoF
A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure:
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:47:22 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Dijous, 29 de setembre de 2011, Scott Kitterman vàreu escriure:
> > > On Thursday, September 29, 2011 08:01:00 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 29
On Thursday 29 September 2011, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 21:43:34 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> > Without judging on the other arguments which look very reasonable to
> > me...
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Kevin Kofler
>
> wrote:
> > > 2. It will be confusing to ou
On 2011-09-30, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure:
>> Hi lists,
>>
>> with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that
>> direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these
>> cleanup tasks targets the S
A Divendres, 30 de setembre de 2011, Sebastian Trüg vàreu escriure:
> Hi lists,
>
> with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that
> direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these
> cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far these
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102748/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Description
---
fixing sy
On Friday, September 30, 2011 04:15:51 PM Markus Slopianka wrote:
> (As a side note I also think that KDE Applications should completely lose
> their version number and get date-based versioning because any application
> can get major new features at any time – see Dolphin 2.0 in SC 4.8.)
Today,
On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 18:11:12 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Wait and see the chaos that will come up when users open their Help/About
> in Konqueror and it tells them that they're using "Konqueror 4.8.0 under
> KDE 4.7.6". (And yes, it still says only "KDE" in 4.6.5, I haven't checked
> 4.7 or
On Thursday 29 September 2011 20:01:00 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But one of my points is that we need features too, not just bugfixes.
> Continuing 4.7.x releases solves the problem of bugfixes just fine, but
> entirely fails to address the issue of features.
But who is (or would be) working on featur
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> 2. It will be confusing to our users, and even to some packagers, to have a
>> KDE SC 4.8 on kdelibs 4.7. The rule so far has always been that the kdelibs
>> version must be th
On 09/30/2011 01:56 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
> On 30/09/11 12:36, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>> I would like to anyone using the "old" API to change to the new
>> ResourceWatcher as soon as possible because I would like to disable the
>> old signals soon. They simply entail to many problems and clutter the
On Thursday, 2011-09-29, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> The reason to stop master was (as far as I understand) to make the
> frameworks branch easily to maintain. If someone is working on 4.8
> (bugfixing, features) all this has to be ported to frameworks, too. So you
> develop a moving target on a movin
> On Sept. 29, 2011, 8:14 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> > Sorry, but this is simply wrong. There is a specific reason why passwords
> > are not blindly saved into the wallet before they are validated. The idea
> > of prompting the user for password and actually storing that password need
> >
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102743/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Andreas Hartmetz.
Description
---
Fix
Forwarding my answer to kde-core-devel in order to give us packagers
a voice outside our own closed mailing list.
Cheers, Eric
--
Eric Hameleers
Jabber: al...@jabber.xs4all.nl
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Hameleers
To: Wulf C.
On Thursday 29 September 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you probably already know, a decision was recently made that kdelibs 4.7
> would be the last 4.x release series of kdelibs, and work would be ongoing
> in the 5.0 (frameworks) and 4.7 (KDE/4.7) branches only. I think this is a
On 30/09/11 12:36, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
I would like to anyone using the "old" API to change to the new
ResourceWatcher as soon as possible because I would like to disable the
old signals soon. They simply entail to many problems and clutter the API.
You might want to contact developers using
Hi lists,
with frameworks in the building and Nepomuk probably going that
direction already for 4.8 I would like to clean up a bit. One of these
cleanup tasks targets the Soprano::Model statement signals. So far these
were the only way to get informed about changes in Nepomuk - with a very
bad imp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102719/#review6943
---
This review has been submitted with commit
5e93e6d56c591fde0dde
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 14:01:50 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 1. This puts kdelibs 4 into maintenance mode even before KDE Frameworks 5 is
> anywhere near a release, let alone versions of the workspace and
> applications actually using it. As a result, we will fail to deliver new
> features to our
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 23:57:56 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102175/
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102291/
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102350/
none of these are critical feature additions. they elevate the usability of
libplasma and are valuable,
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 23:57:53 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I don't like the fact that KDE developers decided to ignore their own policy
> on maintenance updates. I think it breaks your contract with your
> downstreams. In the case of what's been done so far, it doesn't have an
> impact on
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 18:11:12 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Wait and see the chaos that will come up when users open their Help/About in
> Konqueror and it tells them that they're using "Konqueror 4.8.0 under KDE
> 4.7.6". (And yes, it still says only "KDE" in 4.6.5, I haven't checked 4.7
> or 4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102719/#review6941
---
Ship it!
yes, the slot moved to the FolderView class itself, so
32 matches
Mail list logo