On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Matt D. Robinson wrote:
>The day the Linux kernel splinters into multiple, distinct efforts is the
>day I'll believe the kernel is fully into progress over "preference". Right
>now, Alan accepts what he thinks should go into stable kernels, and Linus
>accepts what he thinks
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Dennis wrote:
> objective, arent we?
Pot. Kettle. Black.
> There is much truth to the concept, although Microsoft should not be ones
> to comment on it as such.
What truth? I have seen more "innovation" in the Open Source movement
than I ever have in my 18+ years of
I did some research on the patent database and found nothing regarding such
a patent. There's patent on word processors (not the concept but related to)
and uses tab on the description...and that patent is from 1980.
- Original Message -
From: "James Sutherland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Hello,
Today we put 2.4.1 on our mail server after having see it perform well on
some other boxes. It seems now we are receiving a few calls every hour
from customers reporting that the server tends to hang and eventually
time out on them when downloading mail. All customers that have reported
Dennis wrote:
...
> objective, arent we?
Nope. Are you claiming to be?
> For example, if there were six different companies that marketed ethernet
> drivers for the eepro100, you'd have a choice of which one to buy..perhaps
... Rant deleted
I had a problem with eepro100.
It was fixed same
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Matt D. Robinson wrote:
>
> >The day the Linux kernel splinters into multiple, distinct efforts is the
> >day I'll believe the kernel is fully into progress over "preference". Right
> >now, Alan accepts what he thinks should go into stable kernels,
Greetings,
Just a general question or two.. Please point me to a URL or tell me where
to RTFM, or answer back ;-).
What is the status/condition of using muliport NICs and bonding
them together to form a larger pipe (i.e. a quad channel ethernet card for
an Intel box, bonding all four
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:19:28 -0700,
Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey all. The modversions code has a slight problem with files of the same
>name, but in different directories. eg: drivers/a/foo.c exports FOO, and
>drivers/b/foo.c exports BAR, include/linux/modules/foo.ver will only
>
> 2.4.1-ac8 worked great, 2.4.1-ac13 and ac14 oops
> in IDE initialisation. All 3 have ide.2.4.1-p8.all.01172001.patch
> applied too. I'll try it without the ide patch today.
>
>
> -Thomas
>
> ---kernel messages---
> Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
> ide:
Seems everyone has been busy innovating again, so here is ac17. This merges
2.4.2pre4 which includes more elevator changes so please treat ac17 with
caution.
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.1-ac17
o Fix pegasus for bigendian
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Willis L. Sarka wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Just a general question or two.. Please point me to a URL or tell me where
> to RTFM, or answer back ;-).
>
> What is the status/condition of using muliport NICs and bonding
> them together to form a larger pipe (i.e. a quad channel
Matt D. Robinson wrote:
> My feeling is we should splinter the kernel development for
> different purposes (enterprise, UP, security, etc.). I'm sure
> it isn't a popular view, but I feel it would allow faster progression
> of kernel functionality and features in the long run.
"enterprise" XOR
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:44:27 +0100 (CET),
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While trying to compile 2.4.1-ac1[34] I noticed that the following error
>message appears sometimes:
>
>make[3]: *** No rule to make target
>/home29/ankry/kernel/2.4/linux/drivers/pci/devlist.h',
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
> I did some research on the patent database and found nothing regarding such
> a patent. There's patent on word processors (not the concept but related to)
> and uses tab on the description...and that patent is from 1980.
You know XOR is
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 04:35:02PM -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
> > I did some research on the patent database and found nothing regarding such
> > a patent. There's patent on word processors (not the concept but related to)
> > and uses tab on the
Werner Almesberger wrote:
>
> Matt D. Robinson wrote:
> > My feeling is we should splinter the kernel development for
> > different purposes (enterprise, UP, security, etc.). I'm sure
> > it isn't a popular view, but I feel it would allow faster progression
> > of kernel functionality and
Hello,
I have problems using my scanner (HP C6270A connected to ncr53c810a)
with xsane.
I always get the error message:
error during read: Error during device I/O
Feb 15 23:57:27 localhost kernel: Attached scsi generic sg2 at scsi0,
channel 0, id 4, lun 0, type 3
Feb 15 23:57:27 localhost
I have a SOYO "SY-5EMA+ Super 7" motherboard, with a K6-2 processor.
The 45 Gig IBM drive hangs the BIOS if I let it autodetect it, so I
turn off autodetection for IDE2 primary where it sits. This is probably
not relevant.
My problem is that "hdparm -tT dev/hdc" gives atrocious
performance:-
"David D.W. Downey" wrote:
>
> Seriously though folks, look at who's doing this!
>
> They've already tried once to sue 'Linux', were told they couldn't because
> Linux is a non-entity (or at least one that they can not effectively sue
> due to the classification Linux holds), ...
---
On 02.17 Wolfgang Teichmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have problems using my scanner (HP C6270A connected to ncr53c810a)
> with xsane.
>
> I always get the error message:
>
> error during read: Error during device I/O
>
>
> Feb 15 23:57:27 localhost kernel: Attached scsi generic sg2 at scsi0,
>
Hi,
(I suppose people track this info, but a remark never hurts...)
Just updated Mandrake gcc to gcc-2.96-0.37mdk. Interesting point:
* Thu Feb 15 2001 David BAUDENS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.96-0.37mdk
- Fix build on PPC :)
* Thu Feb 15 2001 Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.96-0.36mdk
-
I am trying to use the --mac-source option in the netfilter code to better refine
access to my linux box. However, I have run up against something. The router through
which my private subnet work box passes sends a 14-group "invalid" mac address,
presumably as an attempt to conceal the real
Hello Wolfgang & J.A. ,
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> On 02.17 Wolfgang Teichmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have problems using my scanner (HP C6270A connected to ncr53c810a)
> > with xsane.
> > I always get the error message:
> > error during read: Error during device
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > You know XOR is patented (yes, the logical bit operation XOR).
> But wasn't that Xerox that had that?
US Patent #4,197,590 held by NuGraphics, Inc.
> Yeah, the same ones that screwed us over with the compression patent
> that shot .gif
Matt D. Robinson wrote:
> Actually I do. Perhaps I should define enterprise as "big iron". In
> that way, enterprise kernels would be far more innovative than a
> secure kernel (which cares less about performance gains and large
> features and more about just being "secure").
Hmm, and if you
Does this help for ppc?
The help talks about BIOS which I know is only on x86.
Does this code include anything that helps a non x86 comp?
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 05:27:31PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> For example, if there were six different companies that marketed ethernet
> drivers for the eepro100, you'd have a choice of which one to buy..perhaps
> with different "features" that were of value to you. Instead, you have
> crappy GPL
Hello Jack & All , Might this be an atm interface ?
If it is not then am I to assume that an atm interface
with its erroneous mac-address is going to have the same
difficulties . That is of course as soon as the atm interface
actually put a valid
At 08:52 PM 2/16/01, you wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > You know XOR is patented (yes, the logical bit operation XOR).
> >But wasn't that Xerox that had that?
>
> US Patent #4,197,590 held by NuGraphics, Inc.
The patent was for using the technique of
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, David Relson wrote:
> At 08:52 PM 2/16/01, you wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > > You know XOR is patented (yes, the logical bit operation XOR).
> > > But wasn't that Xerox that had that?
> > US Patent #4,197,590 held by NuGraphics, Inc.
>
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 07:08:05PM -0500, Simon Kirby wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today we put 2.4.1 on our mail server after having see it perform well on
> some other boxes. It seems now we are receiving a few calls every hour
> from customers reporting that the server tends to hang and eventually
>
Hi,
I was glad to see Linux gain SO_SNDTIMEO in kernel 2.4. It is a very use
feature which can avoid complexity and pain in userspace programs.
Unfortunately, it seems to be very buggy. Here are two buggy scenarios.
1)
Create a socketpair(), PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM.
Set a 5 second SO_SNDTIMEO on
Hahahaha.
Dennis, the only linux network drivers that I have had serious problems
with were yours. They caused kernel panic on 2.0.30+ every 6 hours. Of
course I did not have the source to fix them. In comparision eepro100
works rock solid on all of my machines that use it.
Will I use some
I don't know if this is broken in 2.4.1-ac17 and
2.4.2-pre4, but, what happens when mounting a filesystem
using the loopback device is that the process 'dies' in some
way and there's no way I can kill it.
This is what I did:
mount /test-ext2-image.img /mnt/testimage -o loop,rw -t ext2
And after
grep -r "216.234.235.46" *
...waiting...
./debugps | more
USER PID COMMAND WCHAN
root 1 init do_select
root 7 [kreiserfsd] -
.
root 28438 grep -r 216.234. pipe_wait
Im using grep in /etc and its just waiting
it should have
Linux coredump 2.4.2-pre3 #1 Fri Feb 9 20:57:39 EST 2001 i586 unknown
Kernel modules 2.3.21
Gnu C 2.95.2
Gnu Make 3.79.1
Binutils 2.10.1
Linux C Library2.2.1
Dynamic linker ldd (GNU libc) 2.2.1
Procps 2.0.7
Mount
>
> For example, if there were six different companies that marketed ethernet
> drivers for the eepro100, you'd have a choice of which one to buy..perhaps
> with different "features" that were of value to you. Instead, you have
> crappy GPL code that locks up under load, and its not worth
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001 02:12:40 -0500,
Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> grep -r "216.234.235.46" *
>Im using grep in /etc and its just waiting
grep -r follows symlinks and tries to open named pipes. If you have
qmail installed then /etc/qmail is a symlink to /var/qmail and named
pipe
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, David Balazic wrote:
> Did you try scsi-emulation on IDE disks ?
Don't be silly.
That emulation is from scsi-packet to atapi-packet.
Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA Development
ASL Kernel Development
-
> I note that at least 5 device drivers have similar implementations
> of rvmalloc()/rvfree() et al:
>
> ieee1394/video1394.c
> usb/ibmcam.c
> usb/ov511.c
> media/video/bttv-driver.c
> media/video/cpia.c
>
> rvmalloc()/rvfree() are functions that are used to
301 - 340 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
