On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:42:29PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> This avoids the requirement to mark a lot of initialization functions not
> __cpuinit just for resume from RAM.
>
> More functions could be converted now, didn't do all.
>...
Shouldn't this aready be handled by the following?
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 09:10:06AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Needed for empty_zero_page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:45:57AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>...
> Thanks to Coverity/Adrian Bunk and Frank Filz for spotting the bug.
>...
I don't mind whether I'm credited (and the text can stay as it is), but
I just want to note that I neither am nor was in any way affiliated with
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> As a result, this function just setups re-entrance.
>> As you've also pointed out in your previous reply, this case is
>> peculiar and therefore I believe it should be marked as a BUG(). I've
>> left the original case, if (kcb->kprobe_status==KPROBE_HIT_SS) &&
>>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 06:26:57PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> This was a long standing obscure problem in the relocatable kernel. The
> AMD GART driver needs to unmap part of the GART in the kernel direct mapping
> to
> prevent cache corruption. With the relocatable kernel it is in theory
>
Linus, please pull from
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus
This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
for-linus
This will pull one fix for an oops caused by
* Steven Rostedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hmm, I know paravirt-ops had an issue with mcount in the RT tree. I can't
> remember the exact issues, but it did have something to do with the way
> parameters were passed in.
>
> Chris, do you remember what the issues were?
Yes, paravirt ops have a
* Steven Rostedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> >
> > > {
> > > struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
> > > struct irqaction *action;
> > > Index: linux-compile.git/kernel/lockdep.c
> > > ===
> > > ---
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Perches writes:
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 00:57 -0500, Erez Zadok wrote:
> I think printks should be single statements and
> KERN_CONT should be used as sparingly as possible.
[...]
KERN_CONT is documented as not being SMP safe, but I figured it was harmless
for
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:29 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Linus, please pull from
>
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
> for-linus
>
> This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at:
>
>
> Got a question. How will kernel continue to run if we unmap the kernel
> text/data region mappings?
Normally it shouldn't be in the same 2MB area as the aperture (which
is the only thing that is unmapped). The problem is mostly
the rest of the 40MB kernel mapping.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe
On Thursday 03 January 2008 19:14:38 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:42:29PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > This avoids the requirement to mark a lot of initialization functions not
> > __cpuinit just for resume from RAM.
> >
> > More functions could be converted now, didn't
On 02/11/07 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The "Fake" PCI Hot Plug module fakephp does not complete the slot
> shutdown and will hang a terminal.
>
>
> I am attempting to use the fakephp module to shutdown and restart a
> PCI Express FPGA board when the FPGA is reloaded. Using 2.6.22
>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:37:46PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 10:57 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > The two specific trees of interest would be git-nfsd and git-net.
> >
> > Also, if it's
> If we've got time before 2.6.24 final, I'd wait on this a bit.
> ib_srp:srp_remove_work() has them reversed as well, and I'm currently
> tracking down why it oopses when the srp_remove_host() happens before
> the scsi_remove_host(), which is the documented call sequence.
I think the best
don't start the load_balance_monitor when there is only a single cpu.
rename the kthread because its currently longer than TASK_COMM_LEN
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
kernel/sched.c |5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index:
We need to teach no_hz about the rt throttling because its tick driven.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/sched.h|2 ++
kernel/sched.c | 23 ++-
kernel/sched_rt.c| 30 --
against sched-devel
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
* Steven Rostedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Chris Wright wrote:
> > Yes, paravirt ops have a well-specified calling convention (register
> > based). There was a cleanup that Andi did that caused the problem
> > because it removed all the "fastcall" annotations since
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> Yes, paravirt ops have a well-specified calling convention (register
> based). There was a cleanup that Andi did that caused the problem
> because it removed all the "fastcall" annotations since -mregparm=3
> is now always on for i386. Since MCOUNT
Chris Wright wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I know paravirt-ops had an issue with mcount in the RT tree. I can't
>> remember the exact issues, but it did have something to do with the way
>> parameters were passed in.
>>
>> Chris, do you remember what the issues
* Ingo Molnar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> * K. Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > @@ -486,12 +309,12 @@ void rcu_unboost_readers(void)
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(_boost_wake_lock, flags);
> >
> > - rcu_trace_boost_try_unboost_readers(RCU_BOOST_ME);
> > +
On 1/3/08, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Index: linux/Documentation/x86_64/boot-options.txt
> ===
> --- linux.orig/Documentation/x86_64/boot-options.txt
> +++
Shaohua Li wrote:
> PCI Express ASPM defines a protocol for PCI Express components in the D0
> state to reduce Link power by placing their Links into a low power state
> and instructing the other end of the Link to do likewise. This
> capability allows hardware-autonomous, dynamic Link power
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:02 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Ok I'm blabbing quite a bit here while trying to figure out
> the patch, and maybe there are some useful hints for where more
> comments would be useful. But other than the fact that
> mark_mnt_has_writer() needs to the atomic_inc() even
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:08:43AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:11:13AM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:27:39AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 06:15:32PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > > Hi Vivek,
> > > >
> > > > I
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 04:17:55PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> I'm not very happy with hint #2. I struggled with ways to express it
> and finally decided to ship it^W^W release early/release often. :)
> Suggestions welcome.
>
> ---
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Add a section on
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:52:59PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Change the automatic local version to have the form -n-gSHA1SUMID,
> where 'n' is the number of commits since the last tag (i.e.,
> 2.6.21-rc7). This makes it much more likely that the package names created
> for the kernel
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 06:03:22PM +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:25:35PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:27:59PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> > >
> > > Refine it as suggested by Andreas.
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > This patch removes
While examining vmlinux namelist on i386 (nm -v vmlinux) I noticed :
c01021d0 t es7000_rename_gsi
c010221a T es7000_start_cpu
c0103000 T thread_saved_pc
and
c0113218 T acpi_restore_state_mem
c0113219 T acpi_save_state_mem
c0114000 t wakeup_code
This is because
Rusty Russell wrote:
> When an AIO write gets an error after writing some data (eg. ENOSPC),
> it should return the amount written already, not the error. Just like
> write() is supposed to.
Andrew, please don't queue this fix. I think the bug is valid but the
patch is subtly dangerous.
> diff
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 17:30 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:51:38 -0800
> Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Can you try this?
> > >
> > > That patched oopsed in scsi_remove_host(), but reversing the order has
> > > survived over 500
At Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:49:58 +0200,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> The h8300 port doesn't even compile anymore for some time (the
> first compile error you run into was introduced 7 months ago by
> commit c728d60455e8e8722ee08312a75f38dd7a866b5e).
>
> Are there any patches in some external tree that
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:56 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > If we've got time before 2.6.24 final, I'd wait on this a bit.
> > ib_srp:srp_remove_work() has them reversed as well, and I'm currently
> > tracking down why it oopses when the srp_remove_host() happens before
> > the
Abhishek Sagar wrote:
> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
...
> Done. You should find the desired changed in this patch.
Well done!
This cleans it up very well.
I have just one more comment.
> @@ -463,14 +487,26 @@ static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
> struct pt_regs *regs,
>
Rusty Russell wrote:
> An AIO read or write should return -EINVAL if the offset is negative.
> This check matches the one in pread and pwrite.
>
> This was found by the libaio test suite.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This looks fine to me.
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown
Subject: IB/srp: Fix list corruption/oops on module reload
ib_srp doesn't clean up the transport attributes properly when
unloading, so it leaves references around to free'd memory.
The srp_remove_host() cannot go before the scsi_remove_host() call as
the documented call sequence suggests, as it
On 12/30/2007 12:06 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I needed to get a new hard disk for one of my systems and thought that
> it was about time to start going with SATA.
>
> I picked up a Promise 4-Port Sata300-TX4 to go with a 750G
> Seagate SATA -- I'd had good luck with a Promise ATA100 (P)ATA
> and
>>>i was wondering how to make kernel messages appear on /dev/ttyS0
>>without a reboot, i.e. kernelparam "console=ttyS0"
>>
>>The solution is simple... the following piece of code is inside
>>opensuse-10.3/src/sysvinit-2.86-115.src.rpm#showconsole-1.08.tar.bz2#showconsole-1.08/blogd.c
>>
>>
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> right now we are far away from it - SLUB has an order of magnitude
> larger .o than SLOB, even on UP. I'm wondering why that is so - SLUB's
> data structures _are_ quite compact and could in theory be used in a
> SLOB-alike way. Perhaps one problem is
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:09 -0500, David Dillow wrote:
> As for a better fix, I'm not sure.
Here's a better way than the strncmp. If this meets everyone's approval,
then I can roll up a proper commit.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
index
Dear list,
this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly from a
suspended state.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- linux-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c2008-01-03 20:44:43.0 +0100
+++ linux/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c2008-01-03
Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:56:58AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Subject: move WARN_ON() out of line
From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A quick grep shows that there are currently 1145
Matt Mackall wrote:
I hate the do_foo naming scheme (how about __warn_on?), but otherwise:
Acked-by: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
after I moved it around based on Olof's work, I've now ended up with
warn_on_slowpath()
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "WARNING: at %s:%d %s()\n",
+
> Another thing about the PacDigi core: one has to be very careful
> to avoid sequential accesses to sequential PCI locations when
> programming the chip -- it cannot handle merged register writes.
>
> So for any group of sequentially laid out registers, the code has
> to ensure it never writes
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Yes, no oom even after 20 mins of running (which is double the normal
> time for the oom to occur), also no changes in free lowmem.
Ahhh.. Good then lets redo the patchset the right way (the patch so far
does not address the ZONE_MOVABLE issues) . Does
Subject: Add the end-of-trace marker and the module list to WARN_ON()
From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unlike oopses, WARN_ON() currently doesn't print the loaded modules
Hi Abhishek,
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hmm, I can not agree, because it is possible to insert a kprobe
>> into kprobe's instruction buffer. If it should be a bug, we must
>> check it when registering the kprobe.
>
> I discussed it with other maintainers and knew that current kprobes
> does not
> +if (scsi_is_srp_rport(dev))
> +srp_rport_del(dev_to_rport(dev));
This has the ring of truth to me as the right fix, although I
certainly don't know the details of this code... Fujita-san?
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
kbuild.git contains at the moment 36 patches which is all for the upcoming
merge window.
It has been rebased to latest -linus git tree.
See shortlog below.
Pending patches
===
kbuild:
- Section garbage collection (Denys Vlasenko)
I had too little time to play with it so it will not
> @@ -423,8 +423,8 @@ static void srp_remove_work(struct work_struct *work)
> list_del(>list);
> spin_unlock(>srp_host->target_lock);
>
> -srp_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
> scsi_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
> +srp_remove_host(target->scsi_host);
Thanks... I
On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > > +config PM_CPUINIT
> > > + bool
> > > + depends on PM
> >
> > Please make it PM_SLEEP (PM is more than suspend/hibernation).
>
> That was something that irritated me too while writing the patch, but the
> functions I
> am interested in
On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:08:43AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:11:13AM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:27:39AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 06:15:32PM +0530,
Hi Andrew,
Sorry for the late response.
> Hi, I am trying to implement a watchdog driver in 2.6.23 for the i.MXL
> cpu (based off of drivers/char/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c).
>
> I had a question about the api doc for the watchdog
> (Documentation/watchdog-api.txt). Line 37 says "When the device
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:32:55 +0100
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kbuild.git contains at the moment 36 patches which is all for the upcoming
> merge window.
> It has been rebased to latest -linus git tree.
> See shortlog below.
>
> Pending patches
> ===
> kbuild:
[snip]
>
Subject: move WARN_ON() out of line
From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Matt Meckall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A quick grep shows that there are currently 1145 instances of
From: Hitoshi Mitake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is patch for i3000_edac.c . If you think this is useful, please use it!
There is a missing sequence of initialization code during startup.
Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jason Uhlenkott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Doug Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Made a previous global variable, static in scope
Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
mpc85xx_edac.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.23.8/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
From: Jason Uhlenkott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Modified to run on x86_64 as well as x86
i3000_edac builds (and runs) fine on x86_64.
Signed-off-by: Jason Uhlenkott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Kconfig |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
From: Doug Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This EDAC patch set was applied against: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1
1) Fixed a pci parity regression
2) enabled i3000 building under x86_64 as well as for x86
3) limit scope of variable by adding static to mpc85xx
4) added missing initialization code to i3000
From: Bryan Boatright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Using the EDAC code in kernel.org kernel version 2.6.23.8 I am seeing the
following problem:
In the kernel there is a pci device attribute located in sysfs that is
checked by the EDAC PCI scanning code. If that attribute is set,
PCI
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:13:32 -0500
Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but the problem, when it occurs, is very awkward. The system just
> hangs for hours/days spinning on the reverse mapping locks--in both
> page_referenced() and try_to_unmap(). No pages get reclaimed and NO OOM
The following patches merge the mkimage tool into the kernel. This
utility is used by several arches to create a uImage file suitable for
booting with U-Boot.
As it stands today, a mkuboot.sh script is called, which searches for
the mkimage utility installed on the host system. This is slightly
Several platforms require the mkimage tool to generate a uImage file that is
used with U-Boot. This brings the mkimage tool in-kernel to enable building
those platforms without having mkimage externally provided. The tool is named
mkubootimg for better clarity.
This is currently based off of
Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
the mkubootimg tool.
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/arm/boot/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/avr32/boot/images/Makefile |4 ++--
arch/blackfin/boot/Makefile |4 ++--
Hi.
Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2008 10:52:53 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag 03 Januar 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
On top of this, I made a (too simple at the moment) freeze_filesystems
function which iterates through
Now that the mkubootimg tool is merged into the kernel, we can remove the unused
mkuboot.sh script.
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
scripts/mkuboot.sh | 19 ---
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.orig/scripts/mkuboot.sh
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,19 +0,0
The DLE handling in i4l-audio seems to be broken.
It produces spurious DLEs so asterisk 1.2.24 with chan_modem_i4l
gets irritated, the error message is:
"chan_modem_i4l.c:450 i4l_read: Value of escape is ^ (17)".
-> There shouldn't be a DLE-^.
If a spurious DLE-ETX occurs, the audio connection
The ISDN tty layer doesn't produce a 'NO CARRIER' message after hangup.
I suppose it broke when tty_buffer_flush() has been added to
tty_ldisc_flush() in the commit below.
For isdn_tty_modem_result(RESULT_NO_CARRIER..) the
message inserted via isdn_tty_at_cout() -> tty_insert_flip_char()
is
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:15:48 -0500
"Mike Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 5:02 PM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Several platforms require the mkimage tool to generate a uImage file that is
> > used with U-Boot. This brings the mkimage tool in-kernel to enable
On Jan 3, 2008 5:02 PM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Several platforms require the mkimage tool to generate a uImage file that is
> used with U-Boot. This brings the mkimage tool in-kernel to enable building
> those platforms without having mkimage externally provided. The tool is
> For non-audio connections the problem remains.
> Maybe we can remove the tty_ldisc_flush() in isdn_tty_modem_result()
> at all because it's done at tty_close?
I'm not sure I understand why the tty_ldisc_flush is being done in the
ISDN layer at this point but this change looks fine to me.
Alan
On Jan 3, 2008 5:26 PM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:15:48 -0500 "Mike Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008 5:02 PM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Several platforms require the mkimage tool to generate a uImage file that
> > > is
On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
>On top of this I have my personal todo items such as:
>- modern ncurses interface for menuconfig (ala tig, htop and others)
Sorry.. your comparison {menuconfig, htop} raises an "incompatible
pointer passed" on my side. Please explain :)
>TODO items
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:33:20 -0500
"Mike Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 5:26 PM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:15:48 -0500 "Mike Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On Jan 3, 2008 5:02 PM, Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what the heck, applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:04:06PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> the mkubootimg tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A CC: to RMK and any other arch maintainers being touched by this
would have useful
This patch fixes a fairly serious bug in md/raid5 in 2.6.23 and 24-rc.
It would be great if it cold get into 23.13 and 24.final.
Thanks.
NeilBrown
### Comments for Changeset
We currently do not wait for the block from the missing device
to be computed from parity before copying data to the new
Hi Roland,
Just want to make sure you've seen this patch and if it looks ok for you.
Thanks
Nam
On Thursday 20 December 2007 15:06, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote:
> This patch allows ehca to forward event client-reregister-required to
> registered clients. Such one event is generated by the switch eg.
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 22:26 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Subject: move WARN_ON() out of line
> From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Matt Meckall <[EMAIL
On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >> Pavel Machek wrote:
> So how do you handle threads that are blocked on I/O or a lock
> during the system freeze process,
hi,
a few minutes after upgrading from -rc5 to -rc6 I got:
[ 1310.670986] =
[ 1310.671690] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 1310.672097] 2.6.24-rc6 #1
[ 1310.672421] -
[ 1310.672828]
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:46 -0700, NeilBrown wrote:
> This patch fixes a fairly serious bug in md/raid5 in 2.6.23 and 24-rc.
> It would be great if it cold get into 23.13 and 24.final.
> Thanks.
> NeilBrown
>
> ### Comments for Changeset
>
> We currently do not wait for the block from the
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:41:40 +
Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:04:06PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Rework the architecture specific Makefiles to use the in-kernel version of
> > the mkubootimg tool.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
[Added some CCs]
On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Christian Kujau wrote:
> hi,
>
> a few minutes after upgrading from -rc5 to -rc6 I got:
>
> [ 1310.670986] =
> [ 1310.671690] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> [ 1310.672097] 2.6.24-rc6 #1
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:59:15PM +, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> On Dec 30, 2007 11:53 AM, mgross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> What is the linux-usb policies on new drivers that could be
>>> implemented in user space? When does a kernel driver make sense over
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:34:45 +0100
Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christer Weinigel wrote:
> > By the way, what is the consensus on lines over 80 characters?
> > checkpatch complains about the following:
> >
> > WARNING: line over 80 characters
> > #762: FILE:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:20:09 -0500
David Dillow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> index 950228f..6e7e3c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> @@
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:17:29 +0200
Benny Halevy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan. 03, 2008, 14:30 +0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > Agreed, CodingStyle is not about mindless consistency such as "for
> > (" is the right thing, so "list_for_each (" is consistent with it,
> > it is about
This patch to printk.c fixes a few errors reported by checkpatch.pl
Before:
total: 18 errors, 17 warnings, 1306 lines checked
After:
total: 1 errors, 17 warnings, 1305 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Adrian, I'm sending this patch to you because according
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 18:11 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:20:09 -0500
> David Dillow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> > b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> > index 950228f..6e7e3c8 100644
> > ---
On 04/01/2008, Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before:
> total: 25 errors, 13 warnings, 602 lines checked
>
> After:
> total: 3 errors, 13 warnings, 602 lines checked
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks sane to me.
Reviewed-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 16:00 -0700, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:46 -0700, NeilBrown wrote:
> > This patch fixes a fairly serious bug in md/raid5 in 2.6.23 and
> 24-rc.
> > It would be great if it cold get into 23.13 and 24.final.
> > Thanks.
> > NeilBrown
> >
> > ### Comments
On 04/01/2008, Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch to printk.c fixes a few errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>
[...]
> - for (a=console_drivers->next, b=console_drivers ;
> -a; b=a, a=b->next) {
> + for (a = console_drivers->next,
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:14:46 +0100 Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> This patch to printk.c fixes a few errors reported by checkpatch.pl
>
> Before:
> total: 18 errors, 17 warnings, 1306 lines checked
>
> After:
> total: 1 errors, 17 warnings, 1305 lines checked
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:51:50AM +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote:
> Now that strangers are kept out of /proc//maps, let's welcome them
> with -EPERM instead of a blank file.
NAK
The whole point is that we have to reject it at read() time, not open()
time. Checks in open() are
a)
Now that strangers are kept out of /proc//maps, let's welcome them
with -EPERM instead of a blank file.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/proc/base.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
Before:
total: 25 errors, 13 warnings, 602 lines checked
After:
total: 3 errors, 13 warnings, 602 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Ingo, I'm sending this patch to you since according to git shortlog -e
you are the most active modifier of this file
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 14:15 -0700, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > > I tried with clean 2.6.24-rc3 and get the same bad behavior. This is on
> > > an ia64 box, so maybe that is an issue. I can try on an x86 box as well.
Looking at pit_read() in arch/x86/kernel/i8253.c, it seems that the PIT
clocksource code assumes that the PIT CH0 is in periodic mode. With
clockevents, this assumption is no longer valid. There are at least two
places that make this assumption:
1) The calculation at the end of pit_read()
601 - 700 of 787 matches
Mail list logo
