Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> * Philip Newton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Leon Brocard wrote:
> > > On Thursday, a London.pm Heretic Meeting happened in a lovely
> > > pub with a nice warm fire by the Thames. For the uninitiated,
> > > a Heretic Meeting happens when the first thursday of the month
At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:00:21 +, Steve Purkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg McCarroll wrote:
[ The same old tired nonsense about london.pm meeting dates ]
>
> Absolutely! I mean, does anyone actually *believe* that life is as
> simple as "The first Wednesday of every month" ?!? C'mon -
Hi everyone,
I hope you'll all be coming down to see the AxKit talk a week on Thursday,
anyway what I want to do is get some sort of idea of the kind of thing
you'd be interested in me focusing on for the talk. There's lots I can
talk about, so maybe you'd like to pick bits from this list:
Overv
Matt,
My preferences marked below.
I think I'm going to take up Torrington's kind offer to host this event
(as they offered first :) so hopefully I'll have fully details in the
next couple of days.
Cheers,
Dave...
At Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:40:52 + (GMT), Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
I'm assuming that Matt won't want to talk for the _whole_ evening :)
So anyone got a short talk they want to give as a support act?
Cheers,
Dave...
>I'm assuming that Matt won't want to talk for the _whole_ evening :)
>So anyone got a short talk they want to give as a support act?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Dave...
Related question:
What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.).
Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (project
I'm going along to take a look at Conway Hall tomorrow lunchtime. If it
looks ok[1] I'll book it and pay for it on the spot.
If anyone wants to come along with me, then feel free.
Dave...
[1] And I hope it does - as I don't really have a plan B :)
At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:59:55 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm assuming that Matt won't want to talk for the _whole_ evening :)
> >So anyone got a short talk they want to give as a support act?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Dave...
>
> Related question:
>
> What kit are we going to need
>At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:59:55 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >I'm assuming that Matt won't want to talk for the _whole_ evening :)
>> >So anyone got a short talk they want to give as a support act?
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >
>> >Dave...
>>
>> Related question:
>>
>> What kit are
At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:17:14 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[kit for Damian's talk]
> >I'll be able to answer that better after I've visited tomorrow. I
> >strongly suspect that we'll be asking to borrow you prjector again
> >tho' Neil.
>
> Shall I come along tomorrow?
If you have
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 04:51:49PM +, Mark Fowler wrote:
> Question 1.
>
> Can I make a second X server into a second monitor (well, in my case a
> third one) I doubt it, so here's question two
>
> Question 2.
>
> If I can't, is there any easy way to control client placement/move stuff
> This tool is great fun in a computer room full of unsheathed X
> terminals. :-)
What a wonderfull turn of phrase ;)
>>
>> What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.).
>
>I assume we'll need the usual. Projecter, Screen (or white wall!),
>net connectivity. Can someone at Torrington please confirm which of
>that list they can supply. Thanks.
Sorry, been busy all morning. We can supply either a sc
At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:25:34 +, Matthew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >>
> >> What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.).
> >
> >I assume we'll need the usual. Projecter, Screen (or white wall!),
> >net connectivity. Can someone at Torrington please confirm which of
>
>At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:17:14 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>[kit for Damian's talk]
>
>> >I'll be able to answer that better after I've visited tomorrow. I
>> >strongly suspect that we'll be asking to borrow you prjector again
>> >tho' Neil.
>>
>> Shall I come along tomorrow?
>At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:25:34 +, Matthew Robinson
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.).
>> >
>> >I assume we'll need the usual. Projecter, Screen (or white wall!),
>> >net connectivity. Can someone at Torrington please confirm
At 10:31 12/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:25:34 +, Matthew Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What kit are we going to need for this? (projector, etc.).
>> >
>> >I assume we'll need the usual. Projecter, Screen (or white wall!),
>> >net connectivity. Can someone
At Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:49:04 +, Matthew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >How many people can we get in the room at Torrington? I guess we'll
> >be expecting ~30. Maybe a bit more.
>
> 30 people should be no problem, over 40 and it will probably start
> getting a little personal.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 06:08:15AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
> I'm going along to take a look at Conway Hall tomorrow lunchtime. If it
> looks ok[1] I'll book it and pay for it on the spot.
> [1] And I hope it does - as I don't really have a plan B :)
Hey, if *I* can find him a room, so can you..
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hey, if *I* can find him a room, so can you... :-)
>
talking of organisational skills, dave (ad) how would you fancy
being a london.pm organiser for the london.pm trip to ny.pm?
we seem to have problems getting anyone to take this to
completion
Greg McCarroll sent the following bits through the ether:
> we seem to have problems getting anyone to take this to
> completion
Might this have anything to do with the fact that you, sir, are
currently in charge[1] of it? Passing the buck, are you sir? Pistols
at dawn etc. etc.
Leon, vaguely r
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:44:04PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>
> talking of organisational skills, dave (ad) how would you fancy
> being a london.pm organiser for the london.pm trip to ny.pm?
>
> we seem to have problems getting anyone to take this to
> completion
Well, what dates do you wa
* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > we seem to have problems getting anyone to take this to
> > completion
>
> Might this have anything to do with the fact that you, sir, are
> currently in charge[1] of it? Passing the buck,
Leon Brocard wrote:
> Might this have anything to do with the fact that you, sir, are
> currently in charge[1] of it? Passing the buck, are you sir? Pistols
> at dawn etc. etc.
>
> Leon, vaguely remembering blech volunteering for this...
If not I'll have a crack at doing it. Or doing it jointl
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:44:04PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >
> > talking of organisational skills, dave (ad) how would you fancy
> > being a london.pm organiser for the london.pm trip to ny.pm?
> >
> > we seem to have problems getting anyone
On 12/02/2001 at 18:55 +, David H. Adler wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:44:04PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>>
>> talking of organisational skills, dave (ad) how would you fancy
>> being a london.pm organiser for the london.pm trip to ny.pm?
>>
>> we seem to have problems getting anyone t
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:13:42PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Well, what dates do you want to look at? That's probably the best
> > starting point. After that, we can start talking about options.
>
> Well several of you signed up for this
> Greg, if you send me the list of names and addresses I'd be chuffed.
> (Anyone who didn't email Greg, let me know).
>
done in a few seconds
> Given that sort of info, how much is this likely to cost? Dave? Dave?
> Dave? Bueller?
>
there is not enough of `Bueller'-ing on this list
> [0] Whe
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:15:59PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
>
> We could go for Wed 28 March to Mon 2 April instead; comments?
>
> Greg, if you send me the list of names and addresses I'd be chuffed.
> (Anyone who didn't email Greg, let me know).
>
> Given that sort of info, how much is this li
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:15:59PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> >
> > We could go for Wed 28 March to Mon 2 April instead; comments?
> >
> > Greg, if you send me the list of names and addresses I'd be chuffed.
> > (Anyone who didn't email Greg, let me
Paul Mison wrote:
> I'll welcome the help.
Consider this me co-volunteering then.
> We could go for Wed 28 March to Mon 2 April instead; comments?
London.pm does April Fools' in NY. Hmm. Distinct possibilities. Means I
skip the flight home to go see my Dad on his birthday (also April 1 -
ex
On 12/02/2001 at 19:36 +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> Well, now that you have something to work with, I can get the querying
>> in motion...
>>
>> About how many people are we talking about? Any idea?
>
>i just sent a list of about 8~10 people ( i th
* Paul Mison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Yeah, 10 +- usual errors (people who didn't know and have changed their
> minds, people running out of cash, etc, etc).
>
there is even someone saying that they are hoping to get Oven to send
them to NY at some stage ;-)
Greg
(remember Ron and I may
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:50:32PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> there is even someone saying that they are hoping to get Oven to send
> them to NY at some stage ;-)
I think you're confusing us with the armed posse going over the Oven NY to
demand their money. Oh, hang on, some of us *are* tha
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:59:55AM +, Neil Ford wrote:
>
> Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (projector, PA,
> wireless microphones?)
FWIW, damian has (IIRC) requested a vga connection for ny.
(will try to remember to confirm this at some point...)
Your best bet is to
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:37:14PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> On 12/02/2001 at 19:36 +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >> Well, now that you have something to work with, I can get the querying
> >> in motion...
> >>
> >> About how many people are we t
On 12/02/2001 at 19:59 +, David H. Adler wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:37:14PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
>> On 12/02/2001 at 19:36 +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
>> > David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> >
>> >> Well, now that you have something to work with, I can get the
>>querying
Paul Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/02/2001 at 19:59 +, David H. Adler wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:37:14PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> >> On 12/02/2001 at 19:36 +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >> > David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Well, now that you h
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:18:26PM +, Paul Mison wrote:
> On 12/02/2001 at 19:59 +, David H. Adler wrote:
> >FWIW, 10 is commonly the minimum for a "group". A group rate isn't the
> >only way to go, but it's one option...
>
> Hmm. I assume group is cheaper, though.
You'd be surprised..
>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:59:55AM +, Neil Ford wrote:
>>
>> Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (projector, PA,
>> wireless microphones?)
>
>FWIW, damian has (IIRC) requested a vga connection for ny.
>
>(will try to remember to confirm this at some point...)
>
>Your best
At 21:04 12/02/2001, Neil Ford wrote:
>>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:59:55AM +, Neil Ford wrote:
>>>
>>> Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (projector, PA,
>>> wireless microphones?)
>>
>>FWIW, damian has (IIRC) requested a vga connection for ny.
>>
>>(will try to remember t
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +, Dave Cross wrote:
> And isn't the VGA connection a requirement for the projector? Or the
> laptop? Or something other than the room itself?
My assumption is that that describes what is needed to connect the
projector and laptop.
I just had him talk to t
Piers Cawley wrote:
> > Hmm. I assume group is cheaper, though. Well, of the list, I'd be
> > surprised if that many dropped out, and I had stupidly forgotten Grep's
> > interest, so that takes us up to 12. Which may be enough to guarantee a
> > group. Aah, tricksy.
>
> Am I down as interested? I
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
>
> When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like (almost as
> bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room that you would
> swear is in a crack house.
But the crack is *great*!
:-)
--
David H. Adler
>At 21:04 12/02/2001, Neil Ford wrote:
>>>On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 10:59:55AM +, Neil Ford wrote:
Also what kit are we going to need for Damian's talk? (projector, PA,
wireless microphones?)
>>>
>>>FWIW, damian has (IIRC) requested a vga connection for ny.
>>>
>>>(will try to
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:36:56PM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> >
> > When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like (almost as
> > bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room that you would
> > swea
David H. Adler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> >
> > When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like
> (almost as
> > bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room
> that you would
> > swear is in a crack house.
>
> But the
"Mike Jarvis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David H. Adler wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:32:08PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> > >
> > > When looking at cost, remember what hotel rates in NYC are like
> > (almost as
> > > bad as London). You can easily pay US$250/night for a room
> > th
48 matches
Mail list logo
