On 4/3/11 4:30 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
> As it was suggested earlier, it should be easy to track down all the
> modifications that the editor performed: use a graphical interface to
> dfif (such as Meld [1]) to compare the tex file that you sent
> (original) with the tex that you received (
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestions! I'll have to ponder. What I'd really like is
> to go "old school": Have them mark up the pdf with a pen, send it to me, I
> make the revisions in the lyx file, export tex, send the tex file and a pdf
> to them
are
trying to force me to conduct the editing process in an unfamiliar
file format, namely tex.
However, I suppose they clearly stated that they accept either LaTeX
or Word *before* you submitted your manuscript.
In both cases, the submission-format is used for the revision process.
I don't t
On 2011-04-02, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> Let me add this: The editors don't expect the author of a Word
> submission to conduct the revision process in an unfamiliar file
> format. I'm sure they go back and forth with Word files. But they are
> trying to force me
On Apr 2, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Saturday 02 April 2011 11:03:00 Julien Rioux wrote:
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their
editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want
On Saturday 02 April 2011 11:03:00 Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> > A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
> > process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
> > want revisions, attach
:
> A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
> process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
> want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in
> that marked up tex file and send it back to them.
[...]
>
>
> Save yourself from the tex -> lyx -> tex cycle, as it is known to be
> incomplete. So I see two ways forward (not counting the Word alternative)
>
> 1) Use your original LyX file. Always only modify the original LyX file,
> and use .tex at the last stage (export). For this method, you will fi
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in
that marked up tex file and send it back to
On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their
editing process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file
where they want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the
revisions in that marked up tex file and
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
> A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
> process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they want
> revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in that marked
> up
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in
that marked up tex file and send it back to them.
Now I'm comfortable working
12 matches
Mail list logo