Re: BBEdit 7.0 - Not Impressed

2002-11-14 Thread Chris Nandor
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kee Hinckley) wrote: > At 11:29 PM -0500 11/13/02, Chris Nandor wrote: > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_brian_d_foy) wrote: > > > >> i'll have to see about this CVS tool thing. i'm dubious. > > > >It really rocks. It's fairly simple, b

Re: BBEdit 7.0 - Not Impressed

2002-11-14 Thread Kee Hinckley
At 11:29 PM -0500 11/13/02, Chris Nandor wrote: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_brian_d_foy) wrote: i'll have to see about this CVS tool thing. i'm dubious. It really rocks. It's fairly simple, but it works great. I really only want to do a few things with CVS in my te

Re: BBEdit 7.0 - Not Impressed

2002-11-14 Thread Mike Schienle
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:09:43 -0600 Pete Prodoehl wrote: > > jEdit anyone? http://jedit.org/ > > Open-source, customizable, hackable, extendable, good community, > responsive developers, lots of plugins, multi-platform, etc... > > True, it's slower than BBEdit (since it's written in Java) but i

Re: BBEdit 7.0 - Not Impressed

2002-11-14 Thread Pete Prodoehl
jEdit anyone? http://jedit.org/ Open-source, customizable, hackable, extendable, good community, responsive developers, lots of plugins, multi-platform, etc... True, it's slower than BBEdit (since it's written in Java) but it's also more open, if that's important to you. Pete _brian_d_foy w

Re: BBEdit 7.0 - Not Impressed

2002-11-13 Thread Chris Nandor
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_brian_d_foy) wrote: > i'll have to see about this CVS tool thing. i'm dubious. It really rocks. It's fairly simple, but it works great. I really only want to do a few things with CVS in my text editor: commit and diff. And both are now a

Re: BBEdit 7.0 - Not Impressed

2002-11-13 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark S Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is BARELY an update. BBEdit is going the way of Interarchy.=20 > They've run out of features, or in most causes reached a point where=20 > they refuse to program anything difficult, so we're left with features=20= they

Re: BBEdit 7.0 - Not Impressed

2002-11-13 Thread Mark S Lowe
This is BARELY an update. BBEdit is going the way of Interarchy. They've run out of features, or in most causes reached a point where they refuse to program anything difficult, so we're left with features that barely effect the major user base. BBEdit needs: • A MUCH stronger Find and Replace