At 09:32 AM 12/15/00 -0300, you wrote:
>Jeremy Howard wrote:
>> IMHO, the best open source WebMail servers are PHP based
>
> I have this dangling idea of building a TWIG lookalike (in Perl), with
>a 'plug-in'/'module' structure, so I may write the email client, and
>others fill with their de
> On Fri Dec 15 11:28:03 2000 -0800 brian moseley wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
> > > It's a pretty powerful system and it was designed for
> > > mod_perl. Look it up on CPAN.
> >
> > it's an option, b
Leon Brocard wrote:
>
> Jeremy Howard sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > IMHO, the best open source WebMail servers are PHP based:
>
> In Perl, there's also WING: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mbeattie/wing/ and
> my oh-my-god-it's-still-in-development-and-I'm-still-breaking-
> the-CVS-v
Hi
- Original Message -
From: "George Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 22:47
Subject: RFC: Email (mod_perl) Apache module?
> The module would allow the users to read and send email.
> Now that would be advocacy;-)
No, that would be spam.
--
\js
At 12:23 15/12/2000 -0800, brian moseley wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Robin Berjon wrote:
>
>> Wing has been widely tested in the field iirc, it's
>> probably a good idea to base anything in that domain on
>> it.
>
>possibly. groupware applications aren't that complex really,
>tho (except for cale
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
> Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
>
> I've seen TWIG and its *very* clever, if ugly. It'll let you
> authenticate against a lot of things. Use IMAP or POP. Use News. Use
> mysql, Postgres, MySQL, or n
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Robin Berjon wrote:
> Wing has been widely tested in the field iirc, it's
> probably a good idea to base anything in that domain on
> it.
possibly. groupware applications aren't that complex really,
tho (except for calendaring and scheduling); the main
problem is that they'r
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
I've seen TWIG and its *very* clever, if ugly. It'll let you
authenticate against a lot of things. Use IMAP or POP. Use News. Use
mysql, Postgres, MySQL, or none. Use cookies or encoded links for state.
It's *very* fl
At 11:28 15/12/2000 -0800, brian moseley wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
>> It's a pretty powerful system and it was designed for
>> mod_perl. Look it up on CPAN.
>
>it's an option, but it's got a large amount of depen
On Fri Dec 15 11:28:03 2000 -0800 brian moseley wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
> > It's a pretty powerful system and it was designed for
> > mod_perl. Look it up on CPAN.
>
> it's an option, but it's got a larg
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING?
> It's a pretty powerful system and it was designed for
> mod_perl. Look it up on CPAN.
it's an option, but it's got a large amount of dependencies,
which makes it a tremendous effort for me to
martin langhoff wrote:
>
> brian moseley wrote:
>
> > (speaking as the author of a proprietary mod_perl
> > webmail...)
> >
> > DO IT!!
>
> my fear is that writing it as a mod_perl app, it'd be terribly niche,
> and we wouldn't get it rolling. I'd rather write a bunch of modules,
> that
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
> I have this dangling idea of building a TWIG lookalike (in Perl), with
> a 'plug-in'/'module' structure, so I may write the email client, and
> others fill with their desired modules.
Is there a reason you don't want to just hack on WING? It's
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
> brian moseley wrote:
>
> > (speaking as the author of a proprietary mod_perl
> > webmail...)
> >
> > DO IT!!
>
> my fear is that writing it as a mod_perl app, it'd be terribly niche,
> and we wouldn't get it rolling. I'd rather write a bunch
brian moseley wrote:
> (speaking as the author of a proprietary mod_perl
> webmail...)
>
> DO IT!!
my fear is that writing it as a mod_perl app, it'd be terribly niche,
and we wouldn't get it rolling. I'd rather write a bunch of modules,
that can be called from a CGI or a templating sys
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
> I have this dangling idea of building a TWIG
> lookalike (in Perl), with a 'plug-in'/'module'
> structure, so I may write the email client, and others
> fill with their desired modules. Anyway, it's a seriuos
> undertaking, but it's in my plans
Jeremy Howard wrote:
> IMHO, the best open source WebMail servers are PHP based
true, I am using and patching TWIG quite a lot, and that made me see how
messy PHP gets when dealing with libraries and things. It's not nice to
see a large app written in PHP... at least not this one.
I have
Jeremy Howard sent the following bits through the ether:
> IMHO, the best open source WebMail servers are PHP based:
In Perl, there's also WING: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mbeattie/wing/ and
my oh-my-god-it's-still-in-development-and-I'm-still-breaking-
the-CVS-version-and-it-still-doesn't-have-the-
George Sanderson wrote:
> I think it would be cool to have an email Apache module. I was thinking
> that if the URL was something like:
>
>
> http://www.site.com/user/mail
>
> it would activate the module.
>
> The module would allow the users to read and send email. Kind of like how
> I did Apac
I think it would be cool to have an email Apache module. I was thinking
that if the URL was something like:
http://www.site.com/user/mail
it would activate the module.
The module would allow the users to read and send email. Kind of like how
I did Apache::FileMan (an Apache web site file man
20 matches
Mail list logo
