windows and apache/mod_perl?

2002-12-16 Thread Paul Simon
Is it worth installing apache 1.x and mod_perl 1.x on windows if apache2/mod_perl2/perl5.8 run on windows? Thanks

Re: windows and apache/mod_perl?

2002-12-16 Thread Paul Simon
large part of what a web server (and mod_perl) is supposed to do? Thanks for the feedback. --- Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Paul Simon wrote: > > > Is it worth installing apache 1.x and mod_perl 1.x > on > > windows if apache2/mod_perl2/pe

Apache::DBI

2003-01-02 Thread Paul Simon
Hi all I have a feeling this may be [OT], "take it to the DBI list..." But I'm hoping to eliminate as much as possible any suspicion that Apache::DBI/mod_perl is causing my headache. I'm trying to push this platform at work ;) If anyone can shed some light on this then I'd be very appreciative, of

Re: Apache::DBI

2003-01-06 Thread Paul Simon
--- Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Paul Simon wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > I have a feeling this may be [OT], "take it to the > DBI > > list..." But I'm hoping to eliminate as much as > > possible any susp

Re: Re-installing 1.99_08 binary or 1.99_05 RPM in Red Hat 8 [mp2]

2003-01-15 Thread Paul Simon
--- Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This RPM was working before, so all my messing > around has broken something > I can't find. If the recommendation is to ditch the > RPM and proceed with > the new binary then that's fine. > > thanks again, jon > Red Hat's RPM seems very friendly at first

[mp2] make test errors

2003-04-03 Thread Paul Simon
Is this something to be worried about? Or can I continue with make install? Please help. System: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE Server version: Apache/2.0.45 I received the following summary from make test: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed

[mp2] win2000 + Apache::DBI + Oracle

2003-06-09 Thread Paul Simon
So, according to the docs, http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/performance/mpm.html#Work_with_DataBases_under_Threaded_MPM, using Apache::DBI doesn't do anything under mp2+windows2000 ... What is the status of DBI::Pool? These modules deal mainly with persistent database connections. Is that corre

Re: [mp2] win2000 + Apache::DBI + Oracle

2003-06-10 Thread Paul Simon
--- Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perrin Harkins wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 01:45, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >>mp2+winFU => winnt MPM => no forking, only threads > => Apache::DBI is useless > >>there. not only useless, but also wasteful, since > it's going to do work that > >>ha

Re: variables not changing with modperl??

2002-08-13 Thread Paul Simon
Hi darren Did you try starting apache with "httpd -X".  It spawns only one process and that helps keep things in order, as far as variable values.  You can try trouble shooting with that.  darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: * Michael Drons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[2002-08-13 01:55]:> Thanks fo

PerlResponseHandler ?

2002-08-15 Thread Paul Simon
Hi All Can somebody answer this for me?  Here are two directives for separate directories(1 and 2) to run under ModPerl::Registry (ModPerl::Registry is being called in via a perl startup.pl):     SetHandler perl-script    PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::Registry    PerlOptions +ParseHeaders    Options

win32 apache2.0.40 mod_perl-2

2002-08-16 Thread Paul Simon
Hi all I upgraded from apache2.0.39 to 40 and removed, installed mod_perl-2 via ppm.  Now my Apache::Registry directory is not responding.  The browser just hangs.  Any tips on how I can troubleshoot this? Everything is set up the way I had it working for 2.0.39 and mod_perl-2  Thanks,paulDo You Y

Re: win32 apache2.0.40 mod_perl-2

2002-08-16 Thread Paul Simon
a simple hello world handler, skipping ModPerl::Registry, and see if that works...  Thanks  Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Paul Simon wrote:> > Hi all> > I upgraded from apache2.0.39 to 40 and removed, installed> mod_perl-2 via ppm.> > Now my Ap

install/config mod_perl-2(1.99_08)

2002-10-03 Thread Paul Simon
Is there something in the configuration not jiving? Windows 2000, Apache 2.0.42, mod_perl-2(1.99_08-dev via ppm) In http.conf I have:Include conf/test.confAddHandler cgi-script .cgiIn test.conf I have:PerlRequire "C:/Apache2/conf/startup.pl" Options +ExecCGI SetHandler perl-script PerlR

Re: install/config mod_perl-2(1.99_08)

2002-10-03 Thread Paul Simon
Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Paul Simon wrote:> > Is there something in the configuration not jiving?> > Windows 2000, Apache 2.0.42, mod_perl-2(1.99_08-dev via ppm)> > In http.conf I have:> Include conf/test.conf> AddHandler cgi-scri

Response Headers

2002-10-03 Thread Paul Simon
How do HTTP headers work under Registery::ModPerl?set up: windows2000 apache2.0.42 mod_perl/1.99_08-dev Perl/v5.8.0 I had to comment out the following in the CGI script: #print "Expires: " . time2str( time() + 432000 ) . "\n";#print "Content-type: text/html\n\n"; because it would print out as conte

Re: Response Headers

2002-10-04 Thread Paul Simon
   Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Paul Simon wrote:> > How do HTTP headers work under Registery::ModPerl?> set up: windows2000 apache2.0.42 mod_perl/1.99_08-dev Perl/v5.8.0> > I had to comment out the following in the CGI script:> > #print &

Re: Response Headers

2002-10-04 Thread Paul Simon
Ok. I answered my own question, using mod_expires.  A little off OT...  Paul Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:  Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Paul Simon wrote:> > How do HTTP headers work under Registery::ModPerl?> set up: windows2000 apache2.

Another header question

2002-10-04 Thread Paul Simon
Is it possible for me to create a Content-Length header for a CGI script via ModPerl::Registry or Apache? PaulDo you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!

current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Paul Simon
Hi all I'm asking for some insight, guidance, comments from the list.  I'm currently running a pilot app under win2000 + apache 2.0.42 + perl5.8 + mod_perl. Mostly, it's running great, much faster than the vanilla CGI version. I think the database connection is slowing it down though...  I current

Re: Apache::DBI for persistent connections

2002-10-15 Thread Paul Simon
I was under the impression that Apache::DBI isn't compatible for this set up: win2000 + apache2.0.42 + perl5.8 + mod_perl1.99 For a multi threaded environment, isn't Apache::DBIPool necessary?  I'd rather use Apache::DBI.   Rafiq Ismail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 15

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Paul Simon
people who have been cultivating and supporting it. I wrecked that bike on my home from the university some years ago... It was my first and last motorcycle. Thanks for the feedback,Paul  Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there,On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Paul Simon wrote:> I'm currently

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-15 Thread Paul Simon
t's further down the road for me... In the meantime, I'm going to try the CGI::Cache. Got some work to do :) Thanks for the tips and explanations,Paul  Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Simon wrote:> I currently have CGI pages caching on the client side, which &

Re: current state of conf/code, feedback?

2002-10-16 Thread Paul Simon
dded) at C:/Perl/site/lib/Apache/DBI.pm line 64. What's going on?  Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Simon wrote:> I currently have CGI pages caching on the client side, which > is helping some, but I'm also going to experiment with CGI::Cache. There are some mod_p