Roel> The graphs you provided show a lower noise, this because --nspsytune
Roel> probably. It simply sounds poor, really poor. It sounds nothing like
Roel> the original on my headphones.
Roel>
Roel> I use the one with the "RH extensions" from Dmitry. (thanks for all
Roel> the compiles and har
Robert Hegemann schrieb:
> Mark Powell schrieb am Mon, 02 Okt 2000:
> > On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote:
> >
> > > does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1
> > > gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ?
> >
> > >From your recent posting
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote:
> > >From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely
> > give a sonic improvement. In fact it is more likely to degrade the sound
> > over -q2? If so, the Roel recommendation of -q1, seems a little dangerous?
> > You think the
Mark Powell schrieb am Mon, 02 Okt 2000:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote:
>
> > does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1
> > gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ?
>
> >From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote:
> does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1
> gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ?
>From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely
give a sonic improvement. In fact it is m
