Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Gary McGuy has parents Ebeneezer McGuy and Anonymous Female #38475
> Andy McGuy has parents Ebeneezer McGuy and Anonymous Female #837212
> Therefore they are step-brothers.
Half, not step.
> This would potentially triple the number of persons in the database.
As your o
Am 2015-02-10 um 22:42 schrieb Robert Bihlmeyer:
> Of course, some intelligence in software would be needed to show the
> transitive relationships. But that would be nice, anyway, so that "don't
> make relationship clusters" makes sense.
>
Regarding grandparent relationships, we have a fair number
Am 2015-02-10 um 23:37 schrieb Tom Crocker:
> On 10 Feb 2015 21:42, "Robert Bihlmeyer" wrote:
>
>> This would also make half-brother relationships superflous: you could
>> just link both brothers to their shared parent. [...]
> Not just half brother, all sibling relationships, assuming you have en
Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> a question I had on my mind for some time, that could have some impact
> on this: what is the policy on adding people that have no reasonable
> place in our database (i.e. never performed in any role related to
> music), but are useful as "relationship proxies"?
I don't
On 10 Feb 2015 21:42, "Robert Bihlmeyer" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 2015-02-02 um 13:50 schrieb Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren:
> > Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement "step" and
> > "half" attributes for the sibling relationship, and "step" for the
> > parent/child one.
> a question
Hi,
Am 2015-02-02 um 13:50 schrieb Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren:
> Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement "step" and
> "half" attributes for the sibling relationship, and "step" for the
> parent/child one.
a question I had on my mind for some time, that could have some impact
on
I think with Nicolás that this is overkill. I vividly remember the editor
who tried to add relationships for even the remotest theoretically
imaginable stuff – not only for family relationships, but for the vocal
tree (http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Advanced_Vocal_Tree) and the
like. IMO all
Although I've not come across a need for it while editing, as a
step-brother with step-parents they're (obviously) a different kind of
relationship but an important one. So I wouldn't use brother to mean
step-brother but think we should be able to represent it. I think it would
be odd to limit the
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Rachel Dwight
wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <
> reosare...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement "step" and
> "half" attributes for the sibling relationship, and "step" for the
>
> On Feb 2, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement "step" and "half"
> attributes for the sibling relationship, and "step" for the parent/child one.
> This was never implemented, and there's a ticket for it
Hi!
Ages ago (before my style time) an RFC passed to implement "step" and
"half" attributes for the sibling relationship, and "step" for the
parent/child one. This was never implemented, and there's a ticket for it
still (well, 5...) at http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-9
I personally f
11 matches
Mail list logo
