Using a large mallet, Mikko H?nninen whacked out:
> I remember hearing about "spam.pl", a script to which you can pipe an
> email and it will automatically file a report based on that email. I
http://www.abuse.net has a list of such ... my personal favorite is Catherine
Hampton's spambouncer (a
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 11:52:42PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> I remember hearing about "spam.pl", a script to which you can pipe an
> email and it will automatically file a report based on that email. I
> have no idea what it did, or whether I'm actually imagining this or
> it's real, but tha
Hi !
I just bounced you an email with subject: IRCD hosting ...
This is very important. Because i got this mail and as i tried to
forward it to another person, my mutt segfaulting with core dump.
My current version is 1.2i on solaris 7
If you want, i can send you the complete core file.
--
Na?
** VISA/MasterCard Accepted **
IRC/IRCD/Conference Room - Server hosting Services
*
* Virtual IRCD Server hosting *
*
We offer two types of virtual IRCD server accounts. The standard account
allows
On 17-Aug-2000, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> I remember hearing about "spam.pl", a script to which you can pipe an
> email and it will automatically file a report based on that email.
You are likely thinking of "adcomplain" which can be found at
http://www.rdrop.com/users/billmc/ (or in /usr/ports/ma
* Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000817 23:04]:
> I remember hearing about "spam.pl", a script to which you can pipe an
> email and it will automatically file a report based on that email. I
> have no idea what it did, or whether I'm actually imagining this or
> it's real, but that certainl
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 17 Aug 2000:
> If you're not yet familiar with spamcop, surf on over to www.spamcop.net
> and check 'em out.
I remember hearing about "spam.pl", a script to which you can pipe an
email and it will automatically file a report based on that email. I
have
Charles, et al --
This is coming dangerously close to OT :-)
...and then Charles Curley said...
% On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:40:46AM -0400, David T-G muttered:
% > ...and then Charles Curley said...
% > % On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 08:15:19AM -0400, David T-G muttered:
% > ...
% > % > and etcetc.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:40:46AM -0400, David T-G muttered:
> Charles, et al --
>
> ...and then Charles Curley said...
> % On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 08:15:19AM -0400, David T-G muttered:
> % > ...and then Anthony Green said...
> % > %
> % > % This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail an
It seems, that pgpring does not work correctly.
If I start pgpring in an xterm, I get: "fopen: No such file or directory".
What's this error message? Problems during compilation?
--
===
Daniel Kollar FUJITSU MICROEL
Hi there,
I've got problems with the pgp encryption.
I'm using pgp2 and did everything described in the PGP-Notes.
PGP decoding works slow, but great.
When replying to a pgp encoded mail I get asked for a keyID.
What do I need to enter there? Regardless of what I've tried, I get the keyID query
On 2000.08.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jason Helfman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> no not while vi is open...I mean I am in mutt. I run a macro, asks me
> some questions, and passes it right to vi
Is this for new mail? You can write a macro that sets $editor to a
script which run
A couple of procmail rules and enabling rbl in sendmail or patching
qmail is enough for me. I get maybe 1 peice of spam a month.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 07:40:09PM +1000, Anthony Green muttered:
| Hi,
|
| This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
| it could be done
no not while vi is open...I mean I am in mutt. I run a macro, asks me
some questions, and passes it right to vi
well i guess even further is, what are ppl doing when they say they have
soemthing that is being passed through a scriptcould it be the other
way, the script asking them
e
Charles, et al --
...and then Charles Curley said...
% On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 08:15:19AM -0400, David T-G muttered:
% > ...and then Anthony Green said...
% > %
% > % This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
...
% >
% > much to automate my spam submissions to spam
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 08:15:19AM -0400, David T-G muttered:
> Anthony --
>
> ...and then Anthony Green said...
> %
> % This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
> % it could be done via a Mutt macro or otherwise. Couldnt really see anything
> % on mutt.org for dea
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 10:49:31PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> If i were to make a perl script to ask me some questions, and store the
> information.. Would I be able to pass this to vi and send from mutt?
If you mean while Vi is open, yes.
:r!
will read in the output from .
:2,10!
On 2000.08.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Martin [Keso] Keseg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
> > release 6.1.
>
> no, it;s not a problem about development computers, that's a problem of solaris.
> I was talking abo
Anthony --
...and then Anthony Green said...
%
% This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
% it could be done via a Mutt macro or otherwise. Couldnt really see anything
% on mutt.org for dealing with spam.
As Lars said, that's because it really isn't a mutt issue (
Anthony Green writes:
> Hi,
>
> This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
> it could be done via a Mutt macro or otherwise. Couldnt really see anything
> on mutt.org for dealing with spam.
>
> Ok .. so rather than just deleting a spam mail, I was thinking to generat
Hi,
This was a thought I had while deleteing spam mail and was wondering if
it could be done via a Mutt macro or otherwise. Couldnt really see anything
on mutt.org for dealing with spam.
Ok .. so rather than just deleting a spam mail, I was thinking to generate
a authentic mailer daemon failure
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:19:02PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> my xterm works fine...here is my .Xdefaults file
the .Xdefaults won't affect the resize-behavior.
I've seen reported that some subprocesses don't propagate SIGWINCH up
to the controlling terminal; that's a possibility here.
> On M
Mikko Hänninen writes:
> Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 17 Aug 2000:
> > So I get a ton of similar-style file names. In my case, they're backups
> > produced by my editor. One for each message I wrote. Most of them are
> > not empty, but are just copies of the emails I was reply
According to section 6.3.27 of the mutt manual (I'm running 1.2.5i here) the
variable `date_format' "controls the format of the date printed by the
``%d'' sequence in ``index_format''".
Further, section 6.3.73 says that the %d and %D sequences display the date
and time of a message "in the format
Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 17 Aug 2000:
> So I get a ton of similar-style file names. In my case, they're backups
> produced by my editor. One for each message I wrote. Most of them are
> not empty, but are just copies of the emails I was replying to.
Well, if the editor m
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 10:13:37AM +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> > I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four
> > required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough.
> >
> > The two places that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I have now built mutt 1.3.7 in four different places, two of the four
> required that I get libiconv as the existing iconv wasn't good enough.
>
> The two places that needed libiconv were Solaris 2.6 and Red Hat Linux
> release 6.1.
>
> I think th
my xterm works fine...here is my .Xdefaults file
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:48:08AM +0200, Bjoern Jacke muttered:
| Hi,
|
| if I run mutt in an xterm or anything like that and resize the window
| mutt also resized to perfectly fit to the new size. If I then write a
| mail and vi was run mutt `fo
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:49:11PM -0700 or thereabouts, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I don't understand this but I have a flood of "empty file"s in /tmp
> produced by mutt, what is this about? I know usually there are a few,
> but not this manyexcuse the ls
>
> mutt-dsl-64-34-6-73-16908-22
> mutt-
29 matches
Mail list logo
