RE: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP

2005-03-05 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Robert Blayzor > Sent: March 4, 2005 9:02 PM > To: Bill Nash > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP > > > > Bill Nash wrote: > > At the root of it, it's delibe

RE: Email Complexes

2004-09-14 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: September 14, 2004 5:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Email Complexes > > > > Fantastic. Call the providers, purchase an account and le

RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)

2004-04-19 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Schwartz > Sent: April 19, 2004 12:57 PM > To: 'Dr. Jeffrey Race' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) > > > > Firstly, who enforces it

RE: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT)

2004-04-19 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dr. Jeffrey Race > Sent: April 19, 2004 9:11 AM > To: Jeffrey Race > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Microsoft XP SP2 (was Re: Lazy network operators - NOT) > > > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 06:12:16

RE: Lazy network operators

2004-04-14 Thread Vivien M.
is to buy IP connectivity from the big ISP, avoid using any of their other services (yes, I have fetchmail download mail from my POP3 at my ISP, but do I _use_ that account for anything? Obviously not), and do your own thing. If you advocate restricting this IP connectivity further, then you're

RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo?

2004-03-15 Thread Vivien M.
e web logins. You must be talking about a different Netreg system that the one everyone else has used. The one we're talking about involves you logging in when you connect with an unknown MAC - once you've used the system to match your MAC to your student number/login/etc, then the DH

RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo?

2004-03-14 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: March 14, 2004 10:16 PM > To: Andrew Dorsett > Cc: Vivien M.; 'North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes' > Subject: Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? > > And w

RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo?

2004-03-14 Thread Vivien M.
iscussion, cost much less than the 1U colo alternative. We do it, and I know at least one or two others in our industry do... Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo?

2004-03-14 Thread Vivien M.
most college students are too busy getting drunk or saturating networks with P2P software to figure this out] Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Possibly yet another MS mail worm

2004-03-01 Thread Vivien M.
n against this type of attack. And if you think that step 3 or 5 provided any protection against a determined user, you're wrong. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays

2004-02-06 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: February 7, 2004 1:10 AM > To: Vivien M > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays > > > > I have no objection to the electric chair for scri

RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays

2004-02-06 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: Adi Linden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: February 7, 2004 12:54 AM > To: Vivien M. > Cc: 'Michel Py'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays > > > > If stricter laws on comp

RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays

2004-02-06 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: Michel Py [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: February 7, 2004 12:43 AM > To: Vivien M.; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays > > > > Vivien M. wrote: > > Now, if hooking up an un

RE: Stopping open proxies and open relays

2004-02-06 Thread Vivien M.
a network was punishable by a $1000 fine, and law enforcement somehow had the staff to prosecute all offenders (or a representative sample), I'm sure everybody would agree that suddenly they'd be able to afford antiviruses. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: MS is vulnerable

2004-01-29 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. > Sent: January 29, 2004 1:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MS is vulnerable > > > > "Vivien M." wrote: > > &g

RE: MS is vulnerable

2004-01-29 Thread Vivien M.
s in the background smirking while he watches the TV news. Isn't B more fun for a virus author (and network operators' cardiologists)? Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: [Nanog] RE: MS is vulnerable

2004-01-29 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: Remko Lodder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: January 29, 2004 12:43 PM > To: Vivien M.; 'Jason Lixfeld' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Nanog] RE: MS is vulnerable > > > It's better

RE: MS is vulnerable

2004-01-29 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld > Sent: January 29, 2004 11:55 AM > To: Vivien M. > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MS is vulnerable > > Agreed. That's where

RE: MS is vulnerable

2004-01-29 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld > Sent: January 29, 2004 10:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Vivien M.; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MS is vulnerable > > > This is because your mo

RE: in case nobody else noticed it, there was a mail worm released today

2004-01-28 Thread Vivien M.
. but for as long as the person behind the keyboard wants to run the attachment, a way will be found (and ISTR one patch for Outlook 2000 that blocked your ability to save executables was released), and whoever tries to stop them will be seen as the mean party here. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: in case nobody else noticed it, there was a mail worm released today

2004-01-28 Thread Vivien M.
in the vault, and another has 5000 dollars, wouldn't you expect most of the bank robbers to focus on robbing the first bank, irrelevant of whether the first bank's fault is better protected than the second's? Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic Network Services, Inc. http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Anit-Virus help for all of us??????

2003-11-25 Thread Vivien M.
olitical and social (and economic, to a lesser extent) problem, not a technological one. When technology has the potential to cause harm, it (except for computer technology) is regulated to limit the amount of harm that is done. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Anit-Virus help for all of us??????

2003-11-25 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Brian Bruns > Sent: November 25, 2003 10:21 AM > To: Vivien M.; 'Daniel Karrenberg' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Anit-Virus help for all of us?? > >

RE: Anit-Virus help for all of us??????

2003-11-25 Thread Vivien M.
se their computers as game-only machines (or who dual boot a real OS for non-game purposes) 2) Advertising for $OTHER_OS, where $OTHER_OS can be Win2K, XP, or your favourite Linux distro with KDE, GNOME, etc. Anything that actually WORKS reliably. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: [Fwd: [IP] VeriSign to revive redirect service]

2003-10-16 Thread Vivien M.
for the wildcard record and the thing it points to. With that definition, the ISC patch does break SiteFinder... Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Extreme BlackDiamond

2003-10-13 Thread Vivien M.
say it (and I'll probably regret getting into this discussion), it does look like Randy hit the bounce option in pine or whatever and sent Shazad's private reply straight to NANOG. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: More news coverage

2003-10-08 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: Paul G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: October 8, 2003 8:38 PM > To: Vivien M.; 'ken emery'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: More news coverage > > > - Original Message - > From: "Vivien M."

RE: More news coverage

2003-10-08 Thread Vivien M.
h appears to be down) without the wildcard A record directing stuff to it? Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please contact me ...)

2003-09-28 Thread Vivien M.
domain, so that's actually why the updates went your way, not because you were their primary/secondary DNS in their DNS config. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: If Verisign *really* wants to help ...

2003-09-20 Thread Vivien M.
er. Just out of curiosity, why did they discontinue it? Here in Bell Canada land, this type of thing has been around for hm... 8 years or so? There was a big outcry the first week or so from dialup users (at the time, busy signals were more common than now), then eventually they all did the *XX code

RE: Fun new policy at AOL

2003-08-29 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: Matthew Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: August 29, 2003 4:16 PM > To: Vivien M. > Cc: 'Mikael Abrahamsson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Fun new policy at AOL > > Port forward 127.0.0.1:25 through to someplac

RE: Fun new policy at AOL

2003-08-29 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of JC Dill > Sent: August 29, 2003 3:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Fun new policy at AOL > > > > At 12:32 PM 8/29/2003, Vivien M. wrote: > > > &g

RE: Fun new policy at AOL

2003-08-29 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Matthew Crocker > Sent: August 29, 2003 3:58 PM > To: Vivien M. > Cc: 'Mikael Abrahamsson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Fun new policy at AOL > > >

RE: Fun new policy at AOL

2003-08-29 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: August 29, 2003 3:44 PM > To: Vivien M. > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Fun new policy at AOL > > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Vivien M. wrote: > > > And what do yo

RE: Fun new policy at AOL

2003-08-29 Thread Vivien M.
t; email? > > Time to switch to SMTP AUTH and use the same relay always. And what do you do if you're not the admin for the relay? And what about if the admin tells you "This is why we installed some webmail package. Use that instead."? Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks)

2003-03-12 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jack Bates > Sent: March 12, 2003 9:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks) > > > > From: "Vivi

RE: Put part of Google on 69/8 (was Re: 69/8...this sucks)

2003-03-12 Thread Vivien M.
a solution would be doing something I saw a gentleman from China, IIRC, do on this list quite a while ago. He had added (Mr.) to his .sig to make it easy for people to figure out his gender. Perhaps this would be an easyish way to somewhat-subtly warn people of the correct gender? Vivien -- (Mr.)

RE: Move all 9-1-1 to 8-5-5

2003-03-10 Thread Vivien M.
that IP space. Fortunately for us, though, most problems seemed to be people who wanted to reach us not being able to, and not us not being able to reach sites we wanted to talk to. Still, I suspect the Linux Firewall HOWTO was in large part responsible for the problems we had... Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Root server error

2003-02-27 Thread Vivien M.
an NSLOOKUP for www.stemtostern.com and stemtostern.com > against the i.gtld-servers.net > > why would the www one resolve? You have www.stemtostern.com registered as a name server, so there's a glue record for it in the GTLD servers. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant S

RE: How to secure the Internet in three easy steps

2002-10-27 Thread Vivien M.
we have some other AT&T BI users in different locations (but I think both were formerly-@Home AT&T BI areas) who don't have any ports blocked. Bizarre, I have to say. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org)

2002-08-26 Thread Vivien M.
stick a port number in an MX record. :) Where they got this idea is beyond me (unfortunately), but it's quite a common question... Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

2002-08-21 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Robert Blayzor > Sent: August 21, 2002 10:53 PM > To: 'Vivien M.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org > > > Ru

RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

2002-08-21 Thread Vivien M.
e, I wouldn't run Hotmail/AOL/EarthLink/etc's MXes off dynamic IPs, but for a home/small biz mail server... Oh, and one last thing, when you specify an MX (statically, as you say), you don't put in the IP but rather a name created with A record, so what prevents that A record

RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

2002-08-21 Thread Vivien M.
Is a "real mail server" a closed relay (if so, someone on this list may feel insulted that his deliberately open relay isn't "real" by your standards)? Is your "real mail server" something operated by an organization with more than 200 accounts (in which ca

RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

2002-08-21 Thread Vivien M.
27;re back at square one with all their email gone. A lot of people seem to think that dynamic DNS services are a way to cover up abuse (eg: spam, warez, etc); they're not, as a decent amount of spammers have found out the hard way. Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant Syst

RE: [OT] Re: Readiness for IPV6

2002-07-09 Thread Vivien M.
gt;command Microsoft(R) Windows DOS (C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-2001. C:\DOCUME~1\VIVIEN> C:\DOCUME~1\VIVIEN> It looks to me like you have cmd.exe, which is a 32-bit Windoze-native etc shell, and then you have command.com which is used to run legacy DOS stuff. Command.com feels a _lot

RE: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?

2002-05-03 Thread Vivien M.
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Michael H. Warfield > Sent: May 3, 2002 10:22 PM > To: Vivien M. > Cc: 'Paul Vixie'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com"

RE: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?

2002-05-03 Thread Vivien M.
t they don't have the "if you don't reply in 48 hours, we'll forget you ever existed"? Is that the part you find to be missing in no-ip's modus operandi? FYI, our new approach is that you fill out choice of username, choice of password, and email address. We send a th

RE: RoadRunner abuse?

2002-05-03 Thread Vivien M.
ng have been discussed at length before, believe me. Take a look at the archives around http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2001-05/threads.html#01127 Vivien -- Vivien M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Assistant System Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/

RE: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?

2002-05-03 Thread Vivien M.
who thought you wanted a no-ip.com account, and no-ip.com emailed you to confirm that you do want the account. Vivien Random disclaimer: Yes, we're a competitor of no-ip.com's... And yes, we used to send similar emails to people signing up for an account, although nowadays instead of

RE: is your host or dhcp server sending dns dynamic updatesfor rfc1918?

2002-04-19 Thread Vivien M.
2000 on steroids) have been known in the past to send us those silly updates... And then, there's the problem of people whose mail servers think their domain is dyndns.org and their *NIX cron sends mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of root on their machine, but that's an entirely different i

RE: 216.119.248.0/21

2002-03-06 Thread Vivien M.
or > is AS16994 playing silly buggers here? ARIN's been assigning from 216 for something like two years now, I think... We got some 216.* IPs from one of our upstreams like a year and a bit ago, and I recall having seen them around for quite some time before then. Vivien --