On Sat, May 03 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> First, are there people out there who do not use a collection of maildir
> directories, with all mail in cur and new?
o/ I completely abandoned the usage of separate mail "folders" since I
started using notmuch. All my mail now
On Sat, May 03 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> First, are there people out there who do not use a collection of maildir
> directories, with all mail in cur and new?
o/ I completely abandoned the usage of separate mail "folders" since I
started using notmuch. All my mail n
> The trick here is that it's easy to miss people who are happy with
> current functionality. Adding functionality to address newly-identified
> use cases makes a lot of sense. But removing functionality runs the risk
> of only discovering that people were relying on it after the fact,
> (Which se
> The trick here is that it's easy to miss people who are happy with
> current functionality. Adding functionality to address newly-identified
> use cases makes a lot of sense. But removing functionality runs the risk
> of only discovering that people were relying on it after the fact,
> (Which se
Mark Walters writes:
> I would just like to second what Jani said. There was a lot of
> discussion
I do appreciate that.
> and, at the time, the outcome covered all use cases that
> anyone showed any sign of wanting.
The trick here is that it's easy to miss people who are happy with
current fun
On Mon, 05 May 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi Carl -
>
> On Tue, 06 May 2014, Carl Worth wrote:
>> dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu writes:
>>> However, currently it seems strange that there are *two* different
>>> search terms (folder and path), and that neither one lets you search for
Hi Carl -
On Tue, 06 May 2014, Carl Worth wrote:
> dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu writes:
>> However, currently it seems strange that there are *two* different
>> search terms (folder and path), and that neither one lets you search for
>> a portion of your folder name.
>
> For what it
On Mon, 05 May 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi Carl -
>
> On Tue, 06 May 2014, Carl Worth wrote:
>> dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes:
>>> However, currently it seems strange that there are *two* different
>>> search terms (folder and path), and that neither one lets you search for
>>>
Jani Nikula writes:
> The discussions about this were lengthy and tedious, and I was glad we
> eventually reached some consensus about what we wanted.
This much I do understand. And I apologize if I seem to be raising anew
issues that should finally be behind us.
>> Meanwhile, the new "folder:"
Hi Carl -
On Tue, 06 May 2014, Carl Worth wrote:
> dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes:
>> However, currently it seems strange that there are *two* different
>> search terms (folder and path), and that neither one lets you search for
>> a portion of your folder name.
>
> For what it's
dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes:
> First, thanks for the response. The responsiveness and friendliness of
> the notmuch mailing list goes a long way towards compensating for any
> missing features / customizability one might want.
I'm delighted to hear that the notmuch community mai
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>>> distressing. Ugh.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am not quite sure wha
Hi
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>>> distressing. Ugh.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am not quite sur
Jani Nikula writes:
> It's not going to help you, but I'll mention a few of the issues the old
> folder: search had, which we also had complaints about, and which would
> have been quite hard to fix while preserving the behaviour you want. In
> short, we considered the old folder: search broken.
Jani Nikula writes:
> It's not going to help you, but I'll mention a few of the issues the old
> folder: search had, which we also had complaints about, and which would
> have been quite hard to fix while preserving the behaviour you want. In
> short, we considered the old folder: search broken.
Hi
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>>> distressing. Ugh.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am not quite sure w
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>>> distressing. Ugh.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am not quite sure what y
On Sat, May 03 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
>> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in dire
Mark Walters writes:
>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>> distressing. Ugh.
>
> Hi
>
> I am not quite sure what you are meaning by hierarchically group
> messages. Searching for path:dir/foo
Mark Walters writes:
>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>> distressing. Ugh.
>
> Hi
>
> I am not quite sure what you are meaning by hierarchically group
> messages. Searching for path:dir/foo
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
>> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in dire
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:57:49PM -0700, dm-list-email-notmuch at
scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>
> Worse, because of my poor performance, I was hoping to segregate
> messages by year. So it would be:
>
> 2013/.mail.class
> 2013/.mail.voicemail
> 2014/.mail.class
> 2014/.mail.voicemail
>
>
Hello David,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:16:07PM -0700, David Mazieres expires 2014-07-31 PDT
wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
> >
> > Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
> > update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
> > not work with
On Sat, May 03 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
>> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in directorie
On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
> (bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
> new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
> organize my mail. (Si
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
>> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in directorie
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:57:49PM -0700,
dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>
> Worse, because of my poor performance, I was hoping to segregate
> messages by year. So it would be:
>
> 2013/.mail.class
> 2013/.mail.voicemail
> 2014/.mail.class
> 2014/.mail.voicemail
>
> All
Hello David,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:16:07PM -0700, David Mazieres expires 2014-07-31 PDT
wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
> >
> > Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
> > update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
> > not work with
Jani Nikula writes:
> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>
>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in directories such as:
>>
>> .INBOX.Main/{new,cur}
>> .mail.class/{new,cur}
>>
Jani Nikula writes:
> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>
>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in directories such as:
>>
>> .INBOX.Main/{new,cur}
>> .mail.class/{new,cur}
Mark Walters writes:
> Hi
>
> Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
> update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
> not work with the updated database.
No, I haven't. Okay, so that must be it. Sorry for bothering people.
The discuss
Hi
Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
not work with the updated database.
The update should save a dump of the tags before updating but you might
want to do that manually too (and maybe e
On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
> (bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
> new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
> organize my mail. (Since
Mark Walters writes:
> Hi
>
> Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
> update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
> not work with the updated database.
No, I haven't. Okay, so that must be it. Sorry for bothering people.
The discuss
Hi
Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
not work with the updated database.
The update should save a dump of the tags before updating but you might
want to do that manually too (and maybe e
Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
(bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
organize my mail. (Since tags are not hierarchical, folders are the
best way for me to group mail t
Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
(bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
organize my mail. (Since tags are not hierarchical, folders are the
best way for me to group mail t
37 matches
Mail list logo
